robsul82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 01:35 PM
Original message |
Jeebus...on MSNBC, the Clark embed just called Clark "desperate." |
|
I'm waiting for the Tweety interview of the Deans, and they're killing time by talking with the Edwards and Clark embeds. The Clark lady was getting garbled, but I made out her saying, "He's running frantically, which reflects how desperate he's getting." WTF?!?
Later.
RJS
|
Jack_Dawson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-26-04 01:50 PM by Jack_Dawson
She's useless. She's never said anything positive that I can remember. Rove must've given her a huge bonus.
|
Cheswick2.0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
10. embeds are still reporters |
|
She is just doing her job. She is not supposed to be "useful", just truthful.
|
Ramsey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
I think the words "reporter" and "truthful" have become totally incompatible.
I doubt that the spin any of the embeds are spewing has much to do with what's really going on so much as what talking points they've told to mime today.
|
beawr
(358 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Where there is no news, it must be made... |
|
I refer you to "Citizen Kane" and "Network" for all too true depictions of how our modern news media came to be.
|
liberalnurse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Oh shit....thats not good. |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-26-04 01:39 PM by liberalnurse
MSNBC just is out of control. They have but on mission and goal....Keep *bush in office.
|
cthrumatrix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message |
4. these people are incredible....maybe she's working too hard ..lol |
WatchWhatISay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I don't think the embeds are chosen by the candidates |
|
I think they are chosen by the news media. Why would the Dean campaign choose Candy Crowley?
So the embeds will have no more problem criticizing or sniping a candidate than the anchors do.
|
Neecy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
<<Why would the Dean campaign choose Candy Crowley?>>
You're right, the networks assign the reporters to campaigns. This explains why CNN put Crowley on the Dean campaign when he was the clear frontrunner for the nomination, so she could sneer, grimace, snarl and ridicule instead of doing the difficult work of being a journalist.
|
Skwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
who is trying to move up in the rangs by trashing General Clark.
|
madmax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
7. What's the embeds name? |
robsul82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Melissa something? I was kinda distracted by the poofy blonde hair and huge Julia Roberts teeth.
Later.
RJS
|
Neecy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
I think it's Marissa Buchanan (no relation to Pat that I know of, but it wouldn't surprise me).
Most of the embeds (I HATE that war term) seem okay - they're fairly young and most of them aren't hateful toward the campaigns they cover. I've actually found the campaign trail reporting from MSRNC to be far more balanced than CNN so far.
|
progressivebydesign
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 01:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
What happened to non-objective journalism? I'm seeing far too many adjectives lately. I'm a Dean person.. but to call Clark desperate is way out of bounds. Is the only requirement to be a journalist now is having good hair?
|
LizW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 01:49 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Bill Schneider (is that his name?) on CNN went through all the candidates just now and Clark was the only one he said something nasty about. It was something like, "Every time he tries to make up ground, he stumbles on his own rhetoric." (Not a direct quote, but it was something like that.) :puke:
|
AP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
19. They see the blood in the water with Clark, and they don't want him to |
|
have momentum going into the south.
|
madmax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 01:50 PM
Response to Original message |
|
MSNBC's Marisa Buchanan - embedded on Clark Campaign.
|
Logansquare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
16. Time to start a BuchananWatch |
|
The "Goring" of dem candidates has got to stop.
|
madmax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
Whoever wins the nomination is going to have to respond immediately to any and all b.s. Gore didn't.
|
wryter2000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
What's wrong with these people? To quote Dick Meyer, "We can be such rats."
|
AP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message |
HootieMcBoob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 02:05 PM
Response to Original message |
20. I think she meant determined |
cthrumatrix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-26-04 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. she's afraid of a little work.... most of them sit at their desks |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:13 AM
Response to Original message |