Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama on Bolton recess appointment: "It's the wrong thing to do"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:14 AM
Original message
Barack Obama on Bolton recess appointment: "It's the wrong thing to do"
"It's the wrong thing to do. John Bolton is the wrong person for the job," said Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., a member of Foreign Relations Committee. "The president is entitled to take that action, but I don't think it will serve American foreign policy well."

Jim Manley, a spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said a recess appointment of this "badly flawed, ill-suited candidate" would be an abuse of power.

Bush counselor Dan Bartlett said the president had not made a final decision on whether to make a recess appointment. "He retains that right to do, but he will continue to work with the Senate as long as he can," Bartlett said. "But he has not made a decision."

Earlier Friday, though, White House press secretary Scott McClellan gave the strongest indication yet that Bush planned to make a recess appointment of Bolton, saying the vacancy needs to be filled before the U.N. General Assembly's annual meeting in mid-September. Former Sen. John Danforth left the post in January. "It's important that we get our permanent representative in place," McClellan said. "This is a critical time and it's important to continue moving forward on comprehensive reform."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050730/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/un_ambassador

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bolton will not move forward on "comprehensive reform." He
Edited on Sat Jul-30-05 08:17 AM by tsuki
will be the spoil baby, back-stabbing icon of privilege that will finish setting the world against us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Even Trent Lott said it was the wrong thing to do on TV last night
This Administration though refuses to ever back down or admit they have made a poor decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:25 AM
Original message
The first Bush-Kerry debate, 2004:
BUSH: My opponent just said something amazing. He said Osama bin Laden uses the invasion of Iraq as an excuse to spread hatred for America. Osama bin Laden isn't going to determine how we defend ourselves.

Osama bin Laden doesn't get to decide. The American people decide.

I decided the right action was in Iraq. My opponent calls it a mistake. It wasn't a mistake.

He said I misled on Iraq. I don't think he was misleading when he called Iraq a grave threat in the fall of 2002.

I don't think he was misleading when he said that it was right to disarm Iraq in the spring of 2003.

I don't think he misled you when he said that, you know, anyone who doubted whether the world was better off without Saddam Hussein in power didn't have the judgment to be president. I don't think he was misleading.

I think what is misleading is to say you can lead and succeed in Iraq if you keep changing your positions on this war. And he has. As the politics change, his positions change. And that's not how a commander in chief acts.

Let me finish.

The intelligence I looked at was the same intelligence my opponent looked at, the very same intelligence. And when I stood up there and spoke to the Congress, I was speaking off the same intelligence he looked at to make his decisions to support the authorization of force.

LEHRER: Thirty seconds. We'll do a 30 second here.

KERRY: I wasn't misleading when I said he was a threat. Nor was I misleading on the day that the president decided to go to war when I said that he had made a mistake in not building strong alliances and that I would have preferred that he did more diplomacy.

I've had one position, one consistent position, that Saddam Hussein was a threat. There was a right way to disarm him and a wrong way. And the president chose the wrong way.

LEHRER: Thirty seconds, Mr. President.

BUSH: The only consistent about my opponent's position is that he's been inconsistent. He changes positions. And you cannot change positions in this war on terror if you expect to win.

And I expect to win. It's necessary we win.

We're being challenged like never before. And we have a duty to our country and to future generations of America to achieve a free Iraq, a free Afghanistan, and to rid the world of weapons of mass destruction.

LEHRER: New question, Mr. President. Two minutes.

Has the war in Iraq been worth the cost of American lives, 1,052 as of today?

BUSH: You know, every life is precious. Every life matters. You know, my hardest -- the hardest part of the job is to know that I committed the troops in harm's way and then do the best I can to provide comfort for the loved ones who lost a son or a daughter or a husband or wife.

You know, I think about Missy Johnson. She's a fantastic lady I met in Charlotte, North Carolina. She and her son Bryan, they came to see me. Her husband PJ got killed. He'd been in Afghanistan, went to Iraq.

You know, it's hard work to try to love her as best as I can, knowing full well that the decision I made caused her loved one to be in harm's way.

I told her after we prayed and teared up and laughed some that I thought her husband's sacrifice was noble and worthy. Because I understand the stakes of this war on terror. I understand that we must find Al Qaida wherever they hide.

We must deal with threats before they fully materialize. And Saddam Hussein was a threat, and that we must spread liberty because in the long run, the way to defeat hatred and tyranny and oppression is to spread freedom.

Missy understood that. That's what she told me her husband understood. So you say, "Was it worth it?" Every life is precious. That's what distinguishes us from the enemy. Everybody matters. But I think it's worth it, Jim.

I think it's worth it, because I think -- I know in the long term a free Iraq, a free Afghanistan, will set such a powerful in a part of the world that's desperate for freedom. It will help change the world; that we can look back and say we did our duty.

LEHRER: Senator, 90 seconds.

KERRY: I understand what the president is talking about, because I know what it means to lose people in combat. And the question, is it worth the cost, reminds me of my own thinking when I came back from fighting in that war.

And it reminds me that it is vital for us not to confuse the war, ever, with the warriors. That happened before.

And that's one of the reasons why I believe I can get this job done, because I am determined for those soldiers and for those families, for those kids who put their lives on the line.

That is noble. That's the most noble thing that anybody can do. And I want to make sure the outcome honors that nobility.

Now, we have a choice here. I've laid out a plan by which I think we can be successful in Iraq: with a summit, by doing better training, faster, by cutting -- by doing what we need to do with respect to the U.N. and the elections.

There's only 25 percent of the people in there. They can't have an election right now.

The president's not getting the job done.

So the choice for America is, you can have a plan that I've laid out in four points, each of which I can tell you more about or you can go to johnkerry.com and see more of it; or you have the president's plan, which is four words: more of the same.

I think my plan is better.

And my plan has a better chance of standing up and fighting for those troops.

I will never let those troops down, and will hunt and kill the terrorists wherever they are.

http://www.debates.org/pages/trans2004a.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gademocrat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. Can this lying bully be brought down?
Along with the other liars who outed a CIA operative and compromised national security. Can the United Nations shun him? Everyday we continue to learn of more corruption from this president. When will justice be served?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Another dead freeper P.O.S.
I love it. I frigging LOVE it. Goodbye, bee-yatch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well, I see only one course of action.....
Don't act on any more Bush policies...

As a party, our leadership has to stand up and say this is not in the interests of the people of the US> Bush has put his pride over what is best for the country.

WE Will Not Stand For This...

Don't act on any of his appointments....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. IF...and this is a "big if"...
...the Democrats...specificially, Democrats like the 15 who eagerly lined up to give a "yes" vote for CAFTA...continue to cave whenever Bush pounds his mighty frat boy chest and DEMANDS compliance, I feel that we should use that as a measure of our chances for success in 2008.

If we think for a minute that the 2008 elections will come WITHOUT another full-frontal Karl Rove dirty tricks attack, we're kidding ourselves.

At the end of September, Bush's "Tax Advisory Panel" will be submitting their "recommendations." There is talk of:

1). A National Sales Tax to replace the existing Income Tax

2). ADDING a National Sales Tax to the existing Income Tax

3). Creating a "Flat Tax."

Bruce Bartlett published an excellent paper on the subject on National Review Online:

August 09, 2004, 8:47 a.m.
A National Sales Tax No Vote
The rates would be vastly higher than what you might suspect.

http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_bartlett/bartlett200408090847.asp

THIS will be the test. If we stand still while Bush throws what's left of the working class into full-blown wage slavery, why even BOTHER coming up with a candidate in 2008?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Not one of those is good for working people.....
All it will do is increase the burden on people who work for a living instead of investing for a living...

I am an accountant and have watched my weathiest clients pay less and less in taxes while those of us who have to earn money the old fashioned way, through work, see less money staying in our pockets...

When are the people of this country going to wake up?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. If Bush gets his way on a "fair and simpler tax code"...
...the answer to your question is "never."

Bush "doesn't believe in litmus tests?"

If he gets the support of Democrats to monkey with the tax code and shift the burden from his "base" and onto the backs of the working men and women in this country, the answer to your question is "The people of this country are NEVER going to wake up."



"What a great lookin' group of people...the "haves" and the "have mores." Some call you the "elite"...I call you my "base"..."

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Anyone who votes for any of these has nothing to do with the Dems
and should be excluded.

All these measures are an increase of taxes on lower and middle class people to the benefit of the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Whatever they come up with is sure to be quite regressive
Any changes to the tax structure are certain to be borne on the backs of the working class, a part of society which * and his ilk have shown nothing but contempt for.

* has done an outstanding job of nailing the lid shut on the middle class, which will be nonexistent in another decade. I wish we could have a moratorium on any more "improvements" by this cabal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. ADDING a National Sales Tax to the existing Income Tax
Oh, great. Add a regressive tax to overinflated taxes that are supposed to be progressive but get more and more unfair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. Caption:
"...And then you hold their head firmly in your hands, then give it a quick twist. After a few times they'll either start agreeing with you or else you won't have to worry about them anymore."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. So much for checks and balances.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foursquare Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. they should stop filibustering his appointment, and actually vote
That would show everyone how bad Bolton really is, when no one would vote for him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. But he still would win a majority of votes.
The Repugs are sheep and they follow their leader. Bush says: vote for Bolton. They will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
James T. Kirk Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. I agree! There should be a vote!
I don't really like recess appointments. The Senate has a constitutional duty to consent or not and they should have a vote. This cloture thing is an extraconstitutional rule that weakens the Senate's accountability and responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Recess appointments are extraconstitutional as well
The Democrats should shut down the Senate if Bush appoints the unqualified and incompetent traitor John Bolton to be the ambassador to the UN. He is clearly not the best choice, he will have no credibility at the UN, and U.S. dignity and prestige will suffer yet another body blow from this corrupt administration's misguided actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbartz Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Demand a Recess appointment for Roberts
If Bolton get a recess appointment, I think that the democrats
should ask Bush to do the same for Roberts. He will not do it
since it is only good for about 18 months, but they should
demand it..If it's all right for Bolton, than do the same
for Roberts.... Just my 2 cents...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. That is exactly why it didn't come to a vote....
they didn't have the votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-05 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. We don't want to do anything but discredit the UN lately but
it's a critical time for our rep to be there? Something wicked this way comes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC