Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry says he alone hasn't 'played games' on abortion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodbarnett Donating Member (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 02:39 PM
Original message
Kerry says he alone hasn't 'played games' on abortion
Presidential hopeful John Kerry on Monday called himself the only Democrat in the race who hasn't "played games" on the abortion issue.

Kerry, campaigning for votes in New Hampshire's leadoff primary Tuesday, repeated his pledge to appoint to the Supreme Court only those who would support abortion rights.

Each of the seven major candidates for the Democratic nomination supports the right to abortion. President Bush, however, supports abortion only in cases of rape or incest or when a woman's life is endangered.

<snip>

"I'm the only candidate running for president who hasn't played games, fudged around," said Kerry, a Massachusetts senator. "If you believe that choice is a constitutional right, and I do, and if you believe that Roe v. Wade is the embodiment of that right ... I will not appoint a justice to the Supreme Court of the United States who will undo that right."

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/01/26/politics1351EST0647.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jack_Dawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kerry or Ambien?
Your choice. Is Ambien habit-forming?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Roe Donating Member (567 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is Roe v Wade the embodiment of that right?
Edited on Mon Jan-26-04 02:59 PM by Jane Roe
Quote from Roe v Wade:

"On the basis of elements such as these, (some people) argue that the woman's right is absolute and that she is entitled to terminate her pregnancy at whatever time, in whatever way, and for whatever reason she alone chooses. With this we do not agree. (A)rguments that (a state) either has no valid interest at all in regulating the abortion decision, or no interest strong enough to support any limitation upon the woman's sole determination, are unpersuasive."

Does this really reflect Candidate Kerry's position?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poseidon Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yes, Jane Roe.
Are you the real Jane Roe who has also played games on the abortion issue? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Roe Donating Member (567 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Jane Roe is a pseudonym -- everybody knows that.
To answer more directly: no I am not the woman who had a change of mind about pregnancy termination law.

However, I will say that I don't think that sincerely changing one's mind about a difficult issue should generally be regarded as a mark of shame -- not even when it happens to a politician.

Furthermore, I think that when Candidate Kerry reads the portion of Roe v Wade that I quoted above and realizes how antichoice it is, then he himself will come to second guess the unqualified support he now expresses for Roe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poseidon Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. How is that section anti-choice?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Roe Donating Member (567 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Antichoice in two ways:
Edited on Mon Jan-26-04 04:16 PM by Jane Roe
1. It says that a woman's right to terminate pregnancies is not absolute.

2. It says that state law can be written to restrict women's access to abortion in some circumstances.

This is the part of the Roe majority opinion that I wonder whether Candidate Kerry agrees with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poseidon Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Makes sense to me
Roe follows along the path of viability. Fetuses are certainly viable in the 7th month of pregnancy and after, so Roe gives states the power to block abortions in this period, except to save the mother's life. Why would anyone have a problem with this? Planned Parenthood and NARAL don't. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Roe Donating Member (567 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I think some DUers do have problems with this.
Edited on Mon Jan-26-04 04:46 PM by Jane Roe
I certainly get my fair share of flack when I argue for fetal rights for viable fetuses here on DU.

If you have the search function (and are interested in such trivia) you will easily be able to find many examples of this.

Anyway I am happy that me and Roe and you and NARAL and PP all stand together on this. I think the democratic Party would do well to play up our unity on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poseidon Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. No
hardly any DUers have problems with this. DUers have problems with the partial birth abortion ban act because it includes no health exception. If the PBA ban had a health exception, I imagine that 75% of DUers would support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Roe Donating Member (567 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. LOL
(By the way, I strongly agree that this unconstitutional law should have included an exception exactly as you suggest.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poseidon Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. What's so funny?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Roe Donating Member (567 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. The comic-ly large discrepancy between . . .
what you think DUers think and what I think DUers think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. He made no bones about it months ago.
Edited on Mon Jan-26-04 02:46 PM by blm
He said there WOULD be a litmus for judges. They have to support full reproductive rights as SETTLED law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Welp, he lied...
Or maybe it was a slip of the tongue...

or a subtle nuance I can't understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. WOW. That's a strong statement
I'm not sure how it stacks up but he seems pretty damned sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Career ratings
Since he's been in the Senate, Kerry has a 95% rating from NARAL, including 100% since 1995 and a 100% rating from Planned Parenthood in the 107th Congress.

I trust him with making the right decisions when my reproductive rights are being questioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. So who is this supposed to be a dig at? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Definitely your man for one.
I'm not sure about Howard though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yep I knew Kucinich was one
:)

But I was wondering, since the Kooch is no threat, who he's really going after with this.

Anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Kerry is "playing games" with other candidates records...
Dean is solid on his pro-choice position, and was a chairman (or something like that) at planned parenthood.
http://www.issues2000.org/2004/Howard_Dean_Abortion.htm

Edwards is solid
http://www.issues2000.org/2004/John_Edwards_Abortion.htm

Lieberman... not so much
http://www.issues2000.org/2004/Joseph_Lieberman_Abortion.htm

Clark is solid
http://www.issues2000.org/2004/Wesley_Clark_Abortion.htm

I guess Kerry is attacking Lieberman...

Or he's talking out of his behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Who are you kidding? Lieberman votes w/NARAL 95% of the time
See my other post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. A certain physician who interned at Planned Parenthood, perhaps?
Just a guess. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. Actually I don't like it when
any candidate starts making broad brush statements like "I am the only..."

I bet most voters don't like it either. I cringe whether its Wesley Clark, Howard Dean, John Kerry, etc.

If there is a difference that has to be pointed out then be specific. Otherwise it just smacks of dishonesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Yes but if you point out specific differences
then you're 'attacking'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Agree...I'm the only does sound uncool, but I think it meant about judges.
Noone else said they'd only appoint judges who are prochoice.

Although, I seem to recall Dennis switched to that position about the judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yes. How to consider judicial candidates
that's what he's talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
20. Joe Lieberman has voted with NARAL 95% of the time
Edited on Mon Jan-26-04 04:27 PM by dolstein
<<Lieberman Supports A Woman’s Right To Choose. Joe Lieberman received a 100% rating for protecting a woman’s right to choose from NARAL in 2002; throughout his career in the United States Senate he voted in agreement with NARAL views 95% of the time.>>

http://www.politicsus.com/presidential%20press%20releases/Lieberman/102603g.htm

Isn't this the same as Kerry's lifetime score? Seems to me that the only one playing games around here is Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSdemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. Dean was ON THE BOARD of Planned Parenthood in Vermont.
I'd like to see the other candidates beat that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
25. What the hell does that mean?
I'm sorry, that shit is going to backfire on Kerry. Does he have ANY idea how many NH voters have been to see ALL of the candidates and if they heard the other candidates say thay are pro-choice...how does that make Kerry look? NOT GOOD! Stupid statement! :grr:

Go Wes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
30. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lobo_13 Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
31. Then one has to wonder
why he decided to sit out the vote on partial birth abortions.

If he's as strong on it as he says he is, then maybe he should have shown up for that one.

Oh well, what's one more sacrificed principal when you are obsessed with being President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loren645 Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
32. Let 'em grow up then send 'em to war!
Breeding a new generation of soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
33. THat's why I won't work for Kerry
WTF is that? "well, they did it too!" Either defend your record or don't, but don't say it's right because other people did it.

Man, that is Bush-league, big time. THis kind of shit makes Rove feel warm inside.

It troubles me that the two candidates who have slung other Dems through the mud - Kerry and Dean - are gaining, while the two who have stayed positive - Edwards and Clark - are falling behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
askew Donating Member (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
34. This is an absurd attack.
The only one of our candidates who hasn't been 100% pro-choice is DK and he has publicly changed his position in the past year. Is DK a huge threat to Kerry in NH?

Seriously, when you look at our some of our candidates:

Clark - has been issuing strongly pro-choice statements and positions, since he got in the race.

Dean - served on the Planned Parenthood board, has come out and strongly stated that government has no place in making medical decisions, has clearly stated that there is no such thing a partial-birth abortion it is a term made up by the right wing, and he will eliminate the global and domestic gag rule.

For Pete's Sake, even Lieberman is strongly pro-choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC