aspberger
(230 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 10:01 AM
Original message |
Message, Messenger, and Tie Breakers(vote fraud specialists) |
|
Edited on Mon Aug-01-05 10:03 AM by aspberger
We need a message and a messenger that are so palpable and persuasive that either a Democratic landslide occurs or that vote fraud perpetrators change votes to the Democrats in a close election.
Like the Electoral College, local level vote fraud is a build-in failsafe for close elections or when the stakes are extraordinarily high. This may seem shocking but this is the way it is.
|
ret5hd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 10:03 AM
Response to Original message |
1. so we need to get the fraudsters on OUR side, huh? |
aspberger
(230 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
ret5hd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. why did you edit your OP? |
|
did the comment about jurors strike even you as over the top?
|
aspberger
(230 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. the idea was consistent but |
|
it didn't fit with the sentence as written.
|
ret5hd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. your willingness to accept vote fraud when it favors your side... |
aspberger
(230 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. it just happens anyway |
|
those who do it are miscreants. My point is if we have a strong candidate and message elections will be out of the hands of these miscreants, one way or the other.
|
rman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 10:28 AM
Response to Original message |
|
it's E-L-E-C-T-I-O-N fraud.
there's no indication that fraud was committed by the people who have voted.
|
aspberger
(230 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
do you speak English only?
|
kestrel91316
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 10:38 AM
Response to Original message |
8. It's not "vote" fraud, it's "election" or "vote-counting" fraud .......... |
|
When you call it "vote" fraud it makes the VOTERS look like the guilty ones.
|
rman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. that's what i was trying to say |
wli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 01:24 PM
Response to Original message |
11. election fraud, not "vote fraud" |
|
The entire "voter fraud" fiasco has been used to install Federalist Society lawyers as a DOJ-internal counterpart to the Republican neo-Jim-Crow "challengers" instead of shutting down Diebold, ES&S, and Sequoia and arresting every last employee of those criminal organizations.
|
aspberger
(230 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-01-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. if we didn't pick lukewarm candidates |
|
the national election wouldn't be close enough for such right-wing miscreants to have any material consequence over elections.
|
AuntPatsy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-02-05 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Your sure taking a beating today. Hang in there. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:11 PM
Response to Original message |