Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

what's the worst thing we've learned about John Roberts?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:38 AM
Original message
what's the worst thing we've learned about John Roberts?
A centrist Democrat is asking me to tell her what's bad about Roberts. She thinks he's a brilliant choice. So I thought I'd give her a list of the bad things about him. She's not impressed with the news that he lied about belonging to the Federalist Society.

Got anything? I just sent her the Civil Rights article for starters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. His haircut tells you everything you need to know.
Perfect republican-neocon-fundie clone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bush appointed him.
He could easily be the deciding vote in overturning Roe v. Wade. He could easily be the deciding vote on opposing campaign finance reform. He has expressed doubt that Federal authority extends to protecting endanged species and can easily be the deciding vote in restricting all sorts of environmental laws. Have you said your state-approved prayers today? He could decide that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why he's a brilliant choice
There is virtually nothing on record about him. Most of what we do have is similarly elusive -- legal speculations, position papers written for someone else, and academic matter.

In addition, chances are he won't be all that radical a conservative, which means that apologist historians will have an opportunity to use the Roberts appointment as "evidence" of Bush's keen political acumen.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well, ....
He has ruled in favor of corporate interests over the individual in all cases where he either argued, voted, or wrote opinions.

He has made statements that indicate that he is a strict constructionist, and would like to see anything that is not specifically stated in the Constitution overturned. That not only means Roe, but Brown v Board and who knows how many other decisions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tmooses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. His work with Reagan to redefine the limits of the 1965 Voting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. Two good links of links
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. He's a conservative, what did we expect? IMHO we shouldn't waste.........
the political capital in fighting this one. The next one is bound to be evil incarnate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rogue emissary Donating Member (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. There's a lot of stuff in his Dkospedia page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. involvement in 2000 recount - secreting Solicitor General Memos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. here
Edited on Mon Aug-01-05 12:06 PM by dajoki
read this article. he tried to reverse civil rights and title IX laws, while working for raygun.http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1667559-----WP ARTICLEhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8770914
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC