Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's Toughest Critic On Iraqi Reconstruction? It's Not a Democrat ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:20 AM
Original message
Bush's Toughest Critic On Iraqi Reconstruction? It's Not a Democrat ...
You probably don't know Stuart Bowen's name, but you have to be impressed with his dedication to the Iraqi reconstruction effort.

Bowen, the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction, may be the Bush Administration's toughest critic there.

Bowen, according to a story in the July 26 edition of the Wall Street Journal, "has become one of the most prominent and credible critics of how the administration has handled the occupation of Iraq. In a series of blistering public reports, he has detailed systemic management failings, lax or nonexistent oversight, and apparent fraud and embezzlement on the part of the U.S. officials charged with administering the rebuilding efforts."

As you might expect, Bowen has been harshly criticized by various parts of the Bush Administration. The State Department and the Defense Department have tried to curb the independence of his office, the Journal reports.

For critics of the administration -- who charge that it failed to properly plan for the reconstruction, including the inaccurate prediction that oil revenues would contribute significantly to reconstruction costs -- Bowen's independence is a breath of fresh air.

The irony, though, is that when his position was first created, Democrats assumed that Bowen would provide sunny, spin-driven reviews of the reconstruction effort. For example, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) last year, in a report on "The Politicization of Inspectors General," suggested that auditors such as Bowen wouldn't be "independent and objective."

He has proven them wrong.

***

A report released July 31 by Bowen said the U.S. risks having "little to show for billions" of dollars spent on Iraqi reconstruction, in large part because of mismanagement.

U.S. agencies must determine whether they have enough money to finish the projects and whether the Iraqis have "the tools and knowledge necessary" to keep the projects working after the Americans leave, Bowen wrote. "A failure on either of these points risks leaving little to show for billions in U.S. infrastructure investment," he said, according to an Aug. 1 story in USA Today.

Since arriving in Iraq in February of last year, Bowen has reported:

-- In a January report, Bowen concluded that the American occupation authority failed to keep track of nearly $9 billion that it transferred to Iraqi government ministries, which lacked financial controls and internal safeguards to prevent abuse. One Iraqi ministry cited in the audit inflated its payroll to receive extra funds, claiming to employ 8,206 guards when it actually employed barely 600.

-- A contractor charged the U.S. $3.3 million for phantom employees assigned to an oil-pipeline repair contract.

-- Bowen recently gave the Justice Department information on possibly criminal behavior on the part of U.S. contracting officers in Hillah, the first time government officials have been implicated in potential fraud in Iraq. The officers left the country with no record of how they had spent nearly $1.5 million that couldn't be found by investigators.

-- Regarding reconstruction in Hillah, the U.S. government paid a contractor twice of the same work. Of the $119.9 million allocated for regional projects, $89.4 million was disbursed without contracts or other documentation. An additional $7.2 million couldn't be found at all. A U.S. official was allowed to handle millions of dollars in cash weeks after he was fired for incompetence.

-- An Army soldier serving as the assistant to an American boxing coach admitted to gambling away half the $40,000 he was given to cover the expenses of an Iraqi athletic team during a trip to the Philippines; his case was referred to the military's justice system for a court-martial.

-- An employee of the Coalition Provisional Authority comptroller in Baghdad kept the key to a safe containing more than $140,000 in cash in an unattended backpack.

***

Bowen is a Texas lawyer and longtime Bush associate. In 1994, he was a senior member of Bush's first run for governor. He then served as assistant general counsel in the governor's office, and then deputy general counsel under current U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

When Bush first ran for president, Bowen spent 35 days in Florida during the recount, and then as deputy counsel to the Bush transition team.

He left the administration in 2003 to join Washington law firm Patton Boggs, and soon began lobbying on behalf of URS Group, a San Francisco company specializing in international construction planning and management. URS ultimately won contracts from the provisional authority for $30 million, to oversee reconstruction projects.

Later that year, Congress created a CPA inspector general to "oversee how the money was spent -- a post that eventually morphed into the job of inspector general for all Iraq reconstruction," the Journal wrote. "In January 2004, the White House tapped Mr. Bowen, perceived as a loyal Bush ally, to fill that position."

The office, with a $75 million budget, was to present quarterly reports to Congress.

"At the request of the Bush administration, the job was created with many strings attached. Unlike other federal inspectors general, the new official was to be appointed by the secretary of defense, not the president, and wouldn't be subject to Senate confirmation. The White House also won the right to block the inspector general from releasing a report on national-security grounds -- though none have been blocked so far," the Journal wrote.

***

This article first appeared in Journalists Against Bush's B.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Speaking of Iraqi oil revenues,
The administration was wrong "that oil revenues would contribute significantly to reconstruction costs". Hundreds of millions of dollars worth of oil has been pumped and piped out of Iraq in the past two years - where has that money gone? Does anyone know? Is there an official claim as to where that money has gone? I haven't seen one (and I have tried to fine one). Can anyone enlighten me as to where, in fact, the billions of $$$ worth of oil has gone? Thanks in advance...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think the link I have explains some of that.
I think the problem is the revenues are being used for basic services, rather than addressing the reconstruction costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What basic services? The electricity is still unavailable to most
Iraqis; running water is extremely limited; sewage is in the streets; people cannot go out at night for fear of robbery or death; most schools at still unopened or unattended. I am not attacking you, I just don't think that you can use the phrase "basic services" without saying what it is that you think those are, because I haven't read of anything approaching what someone would call basic services being available in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JABBS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. from the CS Monitor
"Dealing with Iraq's insurgency is a chief reason for the gap between oil revenues and improving living conditions. But another reason for the lag is a growing problem of income loss from smuggling and outright theft of the revenues."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think there's a contradiction between "spin-driven reviews"
... and harsh reports criticizing the reconstruction management. I can easily believe the ramapant waste, fraud, and abuse are an order of magnitude greater than Bowen describes -- corruption that staggers the imagination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeanQuinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Quite interesting, nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC