Sean Reynolds
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-02-05 09:52 PM
Original message |
Clermont County went 71% to Bush in '04. |
|
58.09% to Schmidt in this election.
I'm not buying that there was fraud in this county. Clearly it's evident that the county IS a Republican dominated one.
|
usregimechange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-02-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I don't know, Hackett did much better than Kerry in the others too |
Lex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-02-05 09:54 PM
Response to Original message |
2. You are assuming the 04 Bush percentages are correct? |
Sean Reynolds
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-02-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Edited on Tue Aug-02-05 09:57 PM by Sean Reynolds
So Republicans have stolen every election here in this district for the past 30 years?
I mean, that WAS the last time a Democrat won, right?
|
RagAss
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-02-05 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
kwolf68
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-02-05 09:56 PM
Response to Original message |
|
This idea that there is fraud in every election is absurd. This county IS a Far-Right County.
Let's admit this was a loss, but we played them to the wire in their own field. Let's get on a neutral site (or our turf) and we blow them out the water.
Think of Pat Robertson getting 49.9% of the votes in San Francisco? That's basically what Hackett did tonight...he didn't win, but BOY....anyone think he could maybe go state-wide in '06 and take the Senate seat?
|
GOPNotForMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-02-05 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:00 AM
Response to Original message |