Regarding Schimpanski's comments on "Intelligent Design . . ."

[MrModerate]

As in: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/02/AR2005080201686.html

They're clear proof that:

1) While evolution (a real scientific principle) and intelligent design (a wacko faith-based factoid*) certainly shouldn't share space on any science curriculum, nevertheless;

2) Evolution is not exactly a reliable way to improve a species (e.g., George W. Bush)


* a wholly spurious "fact" invented to create or prolong public exposure or to manipulate public opinion; N. Mailer, 1973