Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The plot against Wilson" (Judge in Plame case.)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
skip fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 02:02 PM
Original message
"The plot against Wilson" (Judge in Plame case.)
Edited on Wed Aug-03-05 02:03 PM by skip fox
One of the judges who Fitzgerald convinced (with evidence we have not yet seen) while up-holding his order that reporters must testify claimed the case indicated that there was an administrative "plot against Wilson."


If the evidence that the judge has seen proves substantial, it will reinforce the thinking that maintains there may will be multiple indictments for "high administration officials" in Fitzgerald's final analysis including at least 2 for Rove. (If not indictments, we'll have notifications of non-indictable wrongful activities--or some such--in the prosecutor's final report).

I say this because in learning about multiple leakers for the 6 reported contacts (John Dean says 6, we know of three: Rove, Libby, and Miller's source who will not specifically release her from her confidentiality agreement) and multiple (3-4) confirming sources, it becomes apparent what occurred. One administrative official discovered the Plame-Wilson-Niger relationship, took it to the White House Iraq Group, turned it over to Rove, who on the spot assigned tasks to different primary leakers/sources assuring no source called another source's contact (so as not to appear too eager), that no source's "pitch" was exactly the same but that their information was all given in an "off hand" manner (e.g., "Don't go too far out on this Wilson thing, I don't want you burnt").

To have 6 calls from 3 leakers is an indication of a coordinated endeavor. If there were the 6 leakers as Dean claims would make the case even more damning. But also consider the planning necessary to have enough confirming sources. Unsure of who the reporters may call to confirm, someone would have to make sure at least 2 other officials were ready and willing to confirm if called.

Therefore a master-mind would have been necessary to coordinate all these calls and confirmations (as many as 11 as was storied last week).

They would have gone to Rove immediately and he, probably in an emergency of the White House Iraq Group, assigned the roles, the stories and the stances, etc.

So he not only leaked by was the mastermind of a conspiracy to leak.

We can only hope he lead a cover-up and committed perjury as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great assessment, skip.....
recOmmended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
back2basics909 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yup...
This seems like the strongest theory IMHO.

But will 3 or 6 leakers be enough to prove a conspiracy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Heh?
"But will 3 or 6 leakers be enough to prove a conspiracy?"

All you need is more than one for a conspiracy...3 or more is MORE than enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. " an indication of a coordinated endeavor"
Can we say "conspiracy"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Once again: Fitzgerald should announce indictments with no forewarning
His staff shouldn't even know about it. He shouldn't even call a press conference.

He should walk into a friendly newsroom and have an ENG crew start rolling and announce them then and there. These people are caught, and they know it. Their only hope is that they can fire him before he has a chance to announce.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. They got their war on, divided the electorate, and won the Senate in '02
That sounds like Rove-work. Continuing from there, they took the presidency in '04 and get to pick two Supreme Court justices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. At least three motives:
1.) Get Wilson

2.) Warn potential "Wilson's" off

and

3.) Stop Plame's investigations of Aramco
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/7/3/16838/88864


Any more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Journalist who knew of the Bush Jr. Administration tactics
who kept their mouths shut during the 2004 elections. If it comes out that air-wave media was complicit in these matters, there needs to be a all out effort to reject their FCC License at time of renewal. Problem, misleading the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Fabulous idea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Exactly how I feel - Media, especially the DC media insiders all KNEW
the truth but let Rove and the WH spin it otherwise DURING AN ELECTION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. We also must push to discover who forged the Niger documents and
how the fact that they were BLATANT FORGERIES was suppressed by the Bush Administration:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1939214#1964309
Thread title: Yglesias: WHO FORGED THE NIGER DOCUMENTS? At the heart of the WMD lies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skip fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Absolute! I don't mean to get so involved with the trees that we forget
the forest. The real story concerns the lies which brought us to invade. (I'm just focused on this. At least for the time.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. It's all part of the same story, the same people are involved, and that is
why the Administration is pulling out all the stops in its attempts to block and now to destroy the Fitzgerald investigation. The whole house of cards is at risk. See, that's the problem with too many lies - after a while, even a little truth is dangerous to the liars.

And I certainly didn't intend any criticism of the focus of this thread! Every bit of this is important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skip fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Didn't take it as criticism. Just explaining that I know.
It's a damned boatload of lies that might sink under enough weight (of our exposure).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC