Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NRCC Memo Email: "Hackett Ran as a Republican" Uh, yeah.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:06 PM
Original message
NRCC Memo Email: "Hackett Ran as a Republican" Uh, yeah.
MEMO
To: GOP Friends
From: Carl Forti, Communications Director
Ed Patru, Deputy Communications Director
Re: OH-02 Special Election

Date: August ,2005
National Republicans last night retained the OH-02 Congressional seat vacated by Ambassador Rob Portman. Republican Jean Schmidt defeated Democrat Paul Hackett. The following post-election analysis may be helpful to you as you discuss the race and its implications.



Republicans Won; Democrats Lost – Republican Jean Schmidt defeated Democrat Paul Hackett by a comfortable margin, 52%-48%. Turnout in last night’s special election was 29%.



Hackett Ran as a Republican – Despite Hackett’s best efforts to nationalize the OH-02 special election, and the national media’s extraordinary interest in the race, the election was a local race and Hackett ran as a Republican. Two of his TV ads – including his closing ad – bore images of the President.



Democrats Failed to Create Wind on Ethics – Despite Democrat attempts to link Schmidt to the cloud of controversy in Columbus, Hackett still failed to win. What happened in Ohio was a microcosm of the strategy Democrats are aiming to employ nationally, namely, they are attempting to defeat Republicans by creating an anti-Republican wind.



Democrats Failed in OH-02 Despite Enormous Help – Even with an extraordinary amount of national media attention showered on Hackett, a huge last-minute influx of money from Democrat-affiliated special interests and other liberal online groups, and aggressive help from online bloggers, Democrats failed in OH-02. Despite all the national attention and online support, national Democrats failed to support Hackett. Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi did not donate to the Hackett campaign. DCCC Chair Rahm Emanuel also failed to lend his personal financial support to Hackett.



The President Remains Popular Among Republicans – The OH-02 special demonstrated that the President remains immensely popular among Republican base voters, and that Democrat attempts to make congressional elections a referendum on the President’s policies in districts where Republicans outnumber Democrats will not work.



National Democrats Are Extremely Vulnerable on the Issue of Taxes – Democrat Paul Hackett was defeated largely as a result of his positions on taxes. OH-02 demonstrated emphatically that national Democrats do not have credibility on the tax message and they continue to be extremely vulnerable on the issue.



National Democrats Wasted Money They Don’t Have on OH-02 – National Democrats spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on the special at a time when they have less than a third of the COH net resources available to them than the national Republicans have.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Calling Bush a "chicken hawk" was sure complementary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hackett ran as a wha...?
duhhhh, am I missing something? I thought he was clearly a democrat and nothing but.
:shrug:

Actually, they might point out in a round about wishy washy fashion that they have an inkling of an idea of what dems are doing, but clearly their own superiority issues are clouding their judgement. I say, "Keep it up, jerkoff!"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marbuc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I've heard he supports gun rights
Edited on Wed Aug-03-05 04:29 PM by marbuc
but I think the similarity ends there. Calling Bush an SOB is clearly NOT Republican like. Will they have us forget the freakish devotion Repubs show towards our version of the Dear Leader?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trish1168 Donating Member (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. anti-republican wind?
from this:
Democrats Failed to Create Wind on Ethics – Despite Democrat attempts to link Schmidt to the cloud of controversy in Columbus, Hackett still failed to win. What happened in Ohio was a microcosm of the strategy Democrats are aiming to employ nationally, namely, they are attempting to defeat Republicans by creating an anti-Republican wind.

It seems to me the republicans passed wind a while ago, and it stinks. Democrats are simply trying to clear the air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. So, the GOP is for Universal Healthcare? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. These are mere talking points
They send them out to operatives and pretend they speak the truth. They know they are lies and so do most people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, that's why the Republican Party dropped $500K worth of ads
into the race to "bury" Hackett.

Republican, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. "ran as a Republican" vs "defeated as a result of his positions on taxes"
can't have it both ways
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Only 29%???
Only 29% turnout? I am so saddened by this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. I got your 'anti-Republican wind' coming out my ass.
Edited on Wed Aug-03-05 04:47 PM by Richardo
What a stupid phrase.

What happened in Ohio was a microcosm of the strategy Democrats are aiming to employ nationally, namely, they are attempting to defeat Republicans by creating an anti-Republican wind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Ran two pictures of Bush, calling him every name in the book, and they take that as a COMPLIMENT?

Delusional, dishonest, and sleazy. That's our GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. They are just covering their asses to explain the fact
that they *lost* beaucoup points.

I would feel sorry for them feeling like they have to frame Hackett in this manner in order to have an excuse for the miserable failure they have in the White House, and his failed policies.

Smucks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carnie_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. And we see
the RW spin machine at its sleazy best. Trying to paint Hackett as a Repuke would be laughable if I didn't think the majority of the Faux/CNN viewers out there would believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raiden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. How dumb do they think we are!?
They put a "D" right next to his name on the ballot; unless they do things differently in Ohio, which is possible, but doubtful.

He almost won because he ran a better campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. 52-48 was a "comfortable" margin?
Gee, considering that district hasn't gone Republican less than 60% in the last 20 years, I'd say that 52-48 was razor-thin. Especially with a 29% turnout. Which means that Schmidt can credibly lay claim to the hearts and minds of 15% of all the voters in her district.

But keep whistling, RNCC. The graveyard awaits. And if you clowns have to spend half a million dollars on every ultrasafe seat in the country, you're gonna have damn little left for anything else.

Hee, hee, hee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. just barely enough to dodge a recount
We'll probably see more fur fly in the next few days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC