yy4me
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-11-05 02:13 PM
Original message |
When a reporter asked a multiple part question |
|
at his press conference, did you notice that our smirker-in-chief almost plotzed! Multiple parts are just too much! He got thru one and admitted that he forgot the other parts. Seem to me that part of the job requirements for "chief honcho" would be the ability to remember more that one thing at a time. Good grief, what have the American people brought upon themselves?
|
shoelace414
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-11-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Whenever they ask a multi part or long question |
|
he takes the words.. answers something different, and calls on the next reporter.
|
NewJeffCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-11-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message |
|
A reporter will ask a foreign dignitary a question in, gasp, their language!
|
Divernan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-11-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message |
3. What's the opposite of multi-tasking? |
PunkPop
(847 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-11-05 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-11-05 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. He can't uni-task either |
|
The opposite is more like zero-task or braindead. Both of which describe * perfectly.
|
PunkPop
(847 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-11-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
fob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-11-05 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. bushi-tasking* aka bushit-asking* |
BlueEyedSon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-11-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
Nite Owl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-11-05 02:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Sure makes you long for President Clinton.
|
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-11-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Clinton could rmember every question |
|
Edited on Thu Aug-11-05 02:17 PM by Canuckistanian
And probably give a multi-part aswer to every point. AND it would be obvious that he knew his subject well.
* shows no knowledge of any subject in depth and just tries to inject as many "happy-words" into his answers that he can, while evading the main point of the question.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:17 AM
Response to Original message |