Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was Bill Clinton right in giving Bush a pass on Iraq?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:03 AM
Original message
Poll question: Was Bill Clinton right in giving Bush a pass on Iraq?
In an article posted by bemildred in this forum, President Clinton is quoted as saying:

“Whether it’s a mistake or not, we ought to try to make this strategy succeed and support that strategy. It’s the only option having to make the sacrifices mean something,” the ex-president told CNN television. “We did what we did, we are where we are,” Clinton said.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2005759



My own reaction to Clinton's words is that Clinton sounded very much like one of the good Germans of 1939.

Bush's invasion of Iraq is on the same moral plane as Saddam's invasion of Kuwait, Imperial Japan's invasion of Manchuria, Nazi Germany's invasion of Poland, and Fascist Italy's invasion of Ethiopia.

A moral man or woman would make "this strategy" fail and would oppose "that strategy," to use Clinton's words. Anything less than that would be tantamount to collaboration in the crimes of the Bush regime.

What do you think of what President Clinton said? Was Clinton right in giving Bush a pass on Iraq, or should we dismiss Clinton's words and redouble our efforts to bring this criminal war to an end?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
newscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bill gave a political answer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree. and he has Hil to think about as he talks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
24. He should worry more about the country than about
Hillary's political career. Hillary will make her own bed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealist Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Hillary ultra conservative
Hillary is a right wing Democrat. I hope she does not run for president. Bill Maher was right on Larry King the other night. He said Hillary would continue to tack right and nobody would be happy with her. We need politicians who think like we do. People who will stand up for what's right, not try to appease the neocons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
41. Rodeo, you nailed it - Bill's sucking up so Hillary can be installed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Clinton admitted to doing Monica "because he could" so he wasn't too
bright the day he admitted that. The best days of Clinton are behind him I used to love the dude, but now you can easily see thru the... "words"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hate to say this but . . .
Bill Clinton is to his wife, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton as Laura Bush is to "that guy".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poppyseedman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. A moral man.........
That's the problem, Clinton and the phrase "moral man" in the same sentence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton was wrong...
We must support the Cindy Sheehans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. No matter what is done about Iraq, Bush** will not get a pass
He'll be held accountable for lying us into his illegal war, someday. There's no statute of limitations on war crimes.

As for Clinton, he's utterly lost the respect I once had for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. My disdain for all things clinton grows every day.
thanks for nothing Clinton's. I thought you were on my side, time has shown me otherwise.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. No, he is dead wrong and has been throughout this war!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howmad1 Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
35. Hey, he was dead wrong for a blow job.
Just imagine how things would have been if he kept his * in his pants. Bush would truly be an asterisk in history and the dems would have done wonders for this country. I can never forgive him for literally ruining his country and the democratic party. As for Hillary, a total disaster if she decides to run on 08'. We will be under bush rule till maybe 2016.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. We always blame the media for scewing polls
& look we have one here. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. "Little Eichmanns" I think the phrase is.
We have a 15 year long strategy here, first to destroy Iraq's offensive capability, then to degrade it's ability resist invasion, and then to invade and convert the place into an economic colony (See "Baghdad Year Zero" by Naomi Klein). That strategy was desperate stupidity in the first place, and it has now failed in the most obvious way, at an expense yet to be counted in full. It's time to cut our losses, fire these fools, and see what can be done to stanch the haemorrhage in our economic and political capital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ballaratocker Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. However....
This question is pretty loaded considering the demographic it is aimed at. No one in their right mind would vote for the first option. It implies that we should never criticize Shhrub on any aspect of the war. I think a better question would be 'We should criticize the circumstances leading to/handling of the war but accept we are there.'
However, I vote for option 2 regardless of the wording.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Welcome to DU ballaratocker!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. I am old enough to remember Vice President Humphrey referring...
to the Vietnam War as this country's greatest adventure. It pains me to hear the same lies and rationalizations used during the Vietnam War being used now to justify keeping the troops in Iraq. Perhaps a better poll question would have been how many panels should the Iraq War Memorial have? I think 1,800 names is 1,800 names too many, so I want to end the war now, not wait for some elusive victory that we all know will never come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. Just because Ma Bush says she looks upon you as one
of her boys doesn't mean you don't have to prove yourself to the Bush Crime Family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
14. Clinton is giving Bush more than a 'pass' on Iraq...
...he's also giving him political cover and a Get Out of Jail Free Card from the Democratic party and their DLC Leadership.

The New Democrats/DLC has now officially taken over the Democratic party and presume to speak for all Democrats on this and other issues. This is also an attempt by the unofficial leader of the DLC to defuse and neutralize anti-Iraq-war Democrats.

The Democratic rank and file are simply expected to go along for the ride and ignore the FACT that the invasion and occupation of Iraq is not only illegal and immoral...but is an ongoing war crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
44. Much more than "giving a pass"!
Edited on Sat Aug-13-05 08:41 PM by bvar22
Bill Clinton is actively campaigning for a continuation of the Bush* War wothout ANY significant change in strategy. It is insane to say that it is a mistake, but lets keep doing it!

Fire the Designers of the Iraq War.
They ARE incompetent. Their DESIGN is a FAILURE!
NONE, absolutely NONE of their predictions were even close to the mark!
Time for a NEW PLAN, and a NEW TEAM to implement the PLAN!!

Sorry Bill. I don't support continued INCOMPETENCE!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
16. fuck bill&hil! DLC= corporate republican. He gave us "welfare reform"
but no corporate reform. He gave us NAFTA too.

I prefer my representatives to actually represent my views not republican corporate views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hollowdweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
17. As I recall similar stuff was said about Vietnam. That was OK 1 year into
it, but I think we are very close to coming up on a time now when we should cut our losses and get the hell out. On one hand I think we almost owe it to the Iraqi's to stay in because we messed it up so bad. On the other hand at this point it is getting worse and I'm not sure it might not be better for them if we pulled out.

Sadly I'm not sure what the sacrifice of our troops will mean in the long run. While Saddam would throw you in jail if he though you were a threat, I believe that Iraq will end up with some kind of Islamic law that will take the country back into the stone age whether the current gov't succeeds or whether the insurgents rule. I think as far as a western society Saddam was about the closest you can get as far as rights of women and cultural stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. The US invasion of Iraq was a setback to Iraqi women's rights
and our invasion of Afghanistan has failed to free women there from religious oppression, which is still ongoing under the US-backed Karzai regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
19. A 'pass'? That was not what he said.
This doesn't even make sense as a predicate for your little push-poll, IG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Well, let's look at what the story actually says Clinton said
‘Mistake or not’, time to move forward on Iraq: Clinton

WASHINGTON: Former US president Bill Clinton on Thursday said Americans should move past lingering divisions over the invasion of Iraq and that it was time to focus instead on establishing a successful democracy there. “Whether it’s a mistake or not, we ought to try to make this strategy succeed and support that strategy. It’s the only option having to make the sacrifices mean something,” the ex-president told CNN television. “We did what we did, we are where we are,” Clinton said. “Eighteen-hunDred Americans have given their lives, thousands of Iraqis have died trying to give their country a future. “So where we are now, it’s important to try to continue this effort to train the security forces and the military forces, which the administration and our military have undertaken. We have to try to make this work,” Clinton said.

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_13-8-2005_pg4_12



Who wrote Clinton's script, Karl Rove? A more charitable person might suggest that Clinton has been spending far too much time with the Bushes and not enough time back in his office in Harlem.

Let's try Clinton's words on another time, another place. What if that had been Josef Goebbels's own words in trying to justify Hitler's policies to anti-nazi Germans? Same message, and same war crimes, and the words are intended to excuse the inexcusable.

Clinton has turned into another apologist for this war!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Turned into?
He's been an apologist since Day One. He is more articulate than W, but he got sucked into the Democratic Swamp of Acquiescence all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
21. Clinton wants this war as do most of the DLC types. They know we're
running out of oil and our economy will soon collapse completely. Stealing it is probably the only answer (a wrong one, of course)because we have so damaged all relations with oil producing nations by our beligerence over the decades.

We are going down and this is why they don't fight Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
22. No,No,No,No,No,No,No....
....etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
26. Clinton was trying to piss off Wolf Blitzer
Which he definitely succeeded in doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
27. I miss the old Clinton. I want the OLD Clinton back.
Edited on Sat Aug-13-05 12:38 PM by TankLV
He started to lose my support the minute he praised and coddled up to those repuke war criminals.

Must be that "Helsinki" syndrom - the one where the prisoner eventually supports their tormentors - like Patty Hearst and POWs.

Clinton has lost almost all respect I once had for him. My disdain and dislike of him grows with each stupid thing that comes out of his mouth.

I really don't understand what he is doing.

Maybe it's as others have said - it's all about "me" for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
28. If Clinton were pro-war
he would have started war with Iraq when he was president. Afterall, he was urged to, but he refused to do it.

In this interview, Clinton said it was a mistake to go into Iraq without letting the UN inspectors finish, and that the war in Iraq doesn't have anything to do with the war on terror. He then wouldn't give an answer on whether it was a mistake or not. That's not supporting the war. That's just Bill not wanting to make major criticisms because of his need to have everyone like him. As I said, if he really is pro-war, he had 8 years to do it. But he didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. He did call for giving inspectors time...
in August 2005; I just don't remember him calling for that option before the war. I do remember that right before the election, on the day the Kaye report was issued and it looked a good issue for Democrats, Clinton personally called into Larry King and excused bush by saying that he too thought that Saddam had wmd.

Well, even Scott Ritter thought that Saddam had saved back something. That's not the point. Was Iraq a threat to this country, and was that "something" worth a war. The answer is "no." But also, it was not what Clinton said to Wolfie or King.

This was a great campaign spot, and I'm sure they'll be more and more.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Clinton took the moral coward's way by refusing to reach the logical
conclusion that his analysis would have led him to. If, as Clinton himself said, the UN inspectors should have been allowed to finish their job and if Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, why then pull the troops that were in hot pursuit of Osama bin Laden out of Afghanistan and re-deploy them to Iraq on Bush's whim? That's the question that Clinton refuses to answer!

Jimmy Carter criticized our concentration camps at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, Bagram, and elsewhere. Clinton doesn't even mention them at all!

Is the Bush's Kool-Aid that good, Bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. you're right, except for one thing
Clinton did criticize Guantanamo a couple months back, calling for it either to be cleaned up or closed down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Big Dog never was real strong on morals to begin with, that I could see.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
59. Google. Clinton + berger + OSU + Albright + Iraq
and what do you get? WAR

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004-37,GGLD:en&q=Clinton+OSU+Berger+Albright+iraq

They were JEERED off the stage and protested by the same alert people who sounded the alarm about Bush. The only difference is that Clinton, for the glory of his legacy and the glory of Hillary, gave half a rat's ass what the people thought.

And even without that, what do you think crippling sanctions & bombing Iraq day in and day out for 8 years are if not WAR?

Clinton was a warmonger. It is time we get that through our heads and start changing this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #28
69. Operation Desert Fox in December 1998
Clinton launched a massive air attack on Iraq.
Clinton fired more Tomahawk missles into Iraq during desert Fox than Bush Sr. did during the entire 1991 Gulf War.

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec1998/n12181998_9812182.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
30. Clinton is one of the smartest idiots this country has ever produced
He should just keep quiet on things like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VADem11 Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
34. Clinton was wrong
Geez, I am getting really tired of the bipartisanship crap he is producing. If he doesn't care that thousands upon thousnads of people have died and Iraq is even more unstable than it was under a dictator, then screw him. Take down Bush and let's get the hell out of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tibbir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
36. I used to have some respect for Clinton as a leader
but not any more since he can't get away from this DLC bullshit. He's more worried about his wife's political future than in being a statesman. Also, he sure is getting awfully chummy with Poppy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
37. It's difficult to believe...
...that 5 people voted to give Bush a 'pass' on his role in taking this country to war on FALSE PRETENSES. Not only that...the implication is that all the war crimes committed since the invasion began are irrelevant as well.

As the opposition party...Democrats have a MORAL RESPONSIBILITY to come up with a plan for withdrawal from Iraq AND for the prosecution of war crimes.

Clinton is taking us in the wrong direction...again.

And like his DLC warmongering brethren...admitting that Bush committed crimes against the state and humanity would expose their own complicity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
38. I wondering where the 5 votes came
from to "give bush a pass on Iraq"?

Creepy undercover freeptards lurking in troll mode?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Mr. Bill Clinton is
the Grand Triangulator.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. We have some well known conservative Democrats in DU
that support the war all the way, and that have defended the rantings of Zell Miller (at least until the day Zell endorsed Bush).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. But, to "give bush a pass"..
is to not be able to admit you're WRONG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Conservative Democrats hate admitting to liberals they were wrong
on the war. In that respect, they are just like the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
42. Look- he's right in that
we have to make the best of the situation that we can. That is extremely important. Even if it means that a number more American soldiers have to die to create the "best case scenario" for Iraq.

There are two questions, that have to be answered IN ORDER, here:

1) WHAT is the best case scenario we can come to in Iraq, and how do we do it?

2) Is the number of American lives that it would cost in order to accomplish that scenario worth it?

The problem is that it seems to be getting to the point where our best case scenario is what we're actually dealing with right now. It's not going to get much better than the way it is. We're losing a GOAL to work toward.

Because of that, it's also starting to look as if, no matter how many of our soldiers die, it's just not worth staying there. The goal isn't worth reaching, really, at all- because there isn't one. There's just no goal, no hope for us to actually do anything useful.

So, I actually agree with Clinton- and DEAN- here. We HAVE TO MAKE THE BEST OF THE SITUATION. It just doesn't look like the best of the situation is anything worth losing more soldiers over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. Our concern should be on saving lives, American and Iraqi
not in sacrificing more lives for some fictional "best case scenario." The fact is that we lost this war, the only question is how long will it take for us to realize that and bring the troops home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. You can't just call it fictional.
We have to look to see if there is anything, realistically, that can be done, by US, to help the Iraqis.

Is there? :shrug:

We've already lost 1,850 Americans there. If the difference between them having a legitimate Constitution and not having one is an extra 50, 100, or 1,000 American lives, should we do it? Or Iraqi lives?

We have to think practically, here. What is POSSIBLE at this point, and what's it worth?

Again, I don't think much of anything better than what is going on right now is possible. And that makes me think that we need to leave.

As far as the "this strategy" point, I don't know if Clinton is saying that he agrees with what Bush is doing, or what. Personally, I sure as hell don't. Mostly, because it looks as if Bush is pretty comfortable just spouting platitudes and not actually doing anything FOR the Iraqis, or even our own troops, at the moment, to move things forward. It doesn't look as if he has any plans to leave whatsoever. That's fucked up as hell, and I do NOT support that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. We are cast in the role of Iraq after it invaded Kuwait!
The only role we can play is get the hell out, immediately and unconditionally, before our withdrawal becomes another "highway of death" as it was for the retreating Iraqi army at the end of the Gulf War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. No Constitution imposed by the US from the other end of a gun barrel
will be considered LEGITIMATE by either the Iraqis or the rest of the World!
The much showcased "elections" were BOGUS.
The Iraqis know it.
The rest of the World knows it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. Well, that's something that we have to take into account, too.
Edited on Sat Aug-13-05 09:20 PM by BullGooseLoony
Do we want to impose on their culture?

What if they don't want women to vote? What if the Constitution that they want doesn't protect minority cultures?

My girlfriend and I were just talking about this last night. She saw a report on the news talking about some of the things that the Iraqis were and weren't putting into their Constitution.

My personal view is that we can't break their culture. It's impossible, whether we even KNOW certain things to be RIGHT or not. We just can't do it. We have to leave sometime, and it's their country. The majority culture will win out, eventually, no matter what.

So, if they want some kind of fucked-up extremist country, that's what they're going to get, in time. We can't stop it- even if we wanted to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #56
64. American troops died to force Iraqi women to wear the veil
How's that for an epitaph for this fiasco brought about by Bush, the PNAC gang, Israeli hardliners, and by those that voted for the Iraq War Resolution!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #42
49. You make "some" sense.
But it IS NOT TIME to COVER the incompetents' asses who got us into the WAR.
Bill Clinton publicly ENDORSED the bush* strateegery, and advocated for its continuation.

It IS time to call the War in Iraq a DISMAL Ill Advised FAILURE, and develop an COMPLETELY NEW strategy for dealing with the situation we are now in!!!!

How many MORE Americans must die;
how many MORE Iraqis must we KILL before this FAILURE
suddenly turns into a SUCCESS???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #49
51.  What is "success," here?
What the hell are we trying to do?

These are questions that really, seriously need to be answered. Bush is deliberately NOT answering them, because he doesn't give a shit! He has NO PLANS TO LEAVE. They're sitting on the oil, and they like it that way. He's just biding his time.

So, if you want to hold this asshole accountable, THAT'S what you need to be saying.

What are we trying to do, and what is the cost...to us and the Iraqis?

What's even conceivably possible? How does he "envision" (HA I had to laugh there) the end of this war and Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. LBN story: US no longer expects to see a model new democracy
The United States no longer expects to see a model new democracy, a self-supporting oil industry or a society where the majority of people are free from serious security or economic challenges, U.S. officials say.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1699844

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. Right. I have very little hope, myself.
The bottom line is that the best that we can do is....there's nothing we can do, really, that's going to make a difference.

So fuck it.

Let's get out with the remaining soldiers that we have, and the damage that we haven't already done.

But it's because there's nothing more we CAN do (let alone anything that Bush WOULD do).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spock_is_Skeptical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
50. he was wrong, wrong, wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
57. wrong. why bother making excuses or saying we should "move on"
bill should have called it like it is.

pandering pandering pandering.

the repukies know it's bullshit.

the lefties don't appreciate it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
58. I'm upset Clinton didn't speak out firmly against the war
but I still like Clinton and what he did for America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Is It Fascism Yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 03:19 AM
Response to Original message
60. Yeah sometimes Bill lets us down. Did he have anyone under his desk
when he said that? Because, you know, he gets crazy sometimes. But you have to admit life was good when Bill was prez. And the economy was good, and he had manners enough not to spit in the world's face, and not enough greed to wage wars for profit. Bill is a good man, but, yeah, sometimes he has let us down, and this is one of those times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
61. Big Dog is wrong this time ...
I'm really tired of hearing, well - we are there now so we have to make it work. Go visit Cindy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
62. That's not what he said, IG...
He isn't giving Bush a pass. He's just saying that since we went in a broke it, we need to fix it. He said, "It's the only option having to make the sacrifices mean something...We did what we did and we are where we are."

That means that we can't go back and change it now even if we tried so we have to try to help the Iraqis build up their country again to the point when we can pull out safely in order to minimize casualties.

Maybe he feels that since we've lost so many of our men and women, we can't have those losses be in vain.

If Clinton were president right now we wouldn't be in this mess and you know it. His only fault is that he tries to please everybody and he wants people to like him.

I don't agree with everything Clinton has done but he was a damned good president, HELLA better than the idiot we have now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #62
63. "We broke it, we fix it" is a LIE!
This is like the rapist that gets caught in the act and his only defense is to say that if we allow him to continue to rape, it will help his victim get over it.

The Iraqis don't want us there!

The world doesn't want us there!

Millions of Americans don't want us there!

At this critical juncture in history, when the American Republic is on the brink of demise, when we needed most to hear the voices of true patriots calling for an end to the police state and for the end to the bloodshed in Iraq, President Clinton has failed America just as surely as Marshall Petain failed France in 1940.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #63
65. President Clinton didn't invade Iraq.
Bush did.

No matter how you try to blame Clinton, it's just not so and nothing you say will make it so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #65
66. No one is saying that Clinton invaded Iraq...
...but he is someone that's in a position to influence opinion against it. All he would have to do is tell the truth.

It's unsettling to see how the Democratic leadership has changed since 2000 and 9-11. Even worse...too many rank and file Dems have allowed them to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #65
67. Clinton could have been a statesman, but chose to be our Petain
Clinton could have joined JImmy Carter in calling the war in Iraq the biggest blunder in our nation's history, but instead he chose to give Bush a pass on Iraq by failing to condemn the war and calling for the troops to come home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
68. LOL... you put the freepers in a strange position
Of having to agree and defend Clinton. I used to really like the Clintons but I'm not so sure anymore. I think Clinton has been away from the "little people" for too long. He's in a very comfortable position in life and has forgotten where he came from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
70. He is really giving President Hilliary a pass since she voted for it.
He is fundamentally motivated by Hillary's run for the WH and their lust to return to power, so most anything he says is pure BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-15-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
71. Big dog forgot where he buried his bone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC