Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What do Wes Clark and Ralph Nader have in common?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:09 PM
Original message
What do Wes Clark and Ralph Nader have in common?
Just trying to peek into Michael Moore's head. I voted for Nader (calm down, in Ohio), and I don't really see too many similarities between the two.

Is it their "outsider" status? Is he mistrustful (and rightfully so) of so-called career politicians?

I (of all people) would appreciate serious answers on this one -- please don't go all Eminem/ad hominem on me on why I like Dean. I do like Michael Moore very much (paid to hear him speak at Xavier University, was in Michigan when Roger & Me broke and have seen everything he's done since) and would appreciate some insight into his endorsement. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SeveneightyWhoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not much in common.
Moore simply matured. He went from an idealist, voting his conscience, to doing what is most important right now: getting Bush out. He feels Clark is the one to do that. That's all there is to it, there's nothing else to analyze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. neither have held public office
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes
pretty much part of it. And fervently against bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
R3dD0g Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. You paid to see Michael Moore?
Why would you do such a thing?

And why would Moore allow such a thing to happen?

I can see where a person would pay to see Welch ex of GE or Trump. But, Michael Moore? That's like ... I can't think of any analogy.

I'm dumbfounded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It was free to XU students
If you wanted to see his speech at the Cintas center, you paid a nominal $5 or $10 bucks.

My sister works for the University, so technically, I didn't pay to go. We both needed tickets, however, for admission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. I'd rather see Moore than Trump or Welch
Why the hell would I want to see rich welfare queens talk about their egos anyway? At least Moore in funny.

Of course, Republicans would love to see Trump or Welch. So his divorce was pretty ugly huh? :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CivilRightsNow Donating Member (646 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nothing.
Moore has just been sucked in.

It's the NRA/ Middle american... flynt, michigan roots.

I woulda expected more from him.. but he's no Jim Hightower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Go here:
This is a link to the Michael Moore interview with Amy Goodman @ Democracy Now where he gives a lengthy explanation of why he's supporting Clark:

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/23/1622230
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Thanks
I caught part of that on TV -- one of the local cable access channels plays & replays Democracy Now each day -- but now I can see the whole thing.

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. No problem...Good Luck in NH
Go Dean Team!

Go Clark!

the others can kiss my ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funky_bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ideologically
probably very little. I can say a big difference is that Wes didn't throw a temper tantrum and start his own party, thereby handing the office to Bush the Lesser.

I believe Clark's appeal to Moore was stated in his letters, but to sum it up, Moore believes the Nader thing was a fiasco, but he also doesn't have a lot of faith in the standard career politician. With Clark, we get a refreshing break from you usual politico, and yet a man with intellegence and passion for democratic ideals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Moore was in awe of Clark after a CNN reporter interviewed him then
turned to Clark to make fun of Moore. Clark immediately spoke up for Moore's right to say what ever he felt. I sincerely believe Mr. Moore started looking seriously at Gen. Clark at that time and liked what he saw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. Clark really got Moore's attention when he defended Moore on the air.
They didn't know each other, Clark was doing his CNN military analyst gig and the war had started, and Moore had recently gotten booed at the Academy Awards ceremony for his Anti War speech. Aaran Brown finished an interview with Moore, then asked Clark what he thought about him and his statements, and Clark said he had no problem with it. It was important for Americans to actively debate issues as important as this, (or something close to that).

Moore was impressed that Clark, a General, had that immediate reaction, and he decided to look into him. Moore spent a lot of time doing just that, they met more than once to talk I gather. The rest is history, and Moore told you why he's backing Clark in his letter. I think he means it. Once you suspend cynical disbelief, Clark really is a remarkable person. He says what he believes. I suspect Moore likes that about Clark also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I missed that, that's interesting
If I were more of a cynic, that would sound a bit like a quid pro quo.

I don't believe that -- but to the uninitiated (say, Peter Jennings), that might be a point of attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. He met Clark in person and discussed issues, & assessed electability.
It's as simple as that. You'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Victor Wong Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. Both are better candidates than Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Thanks.
Try reading the first post on a thread before posting to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. I dont have a clue
Moore's endorsement of Clark is problematic at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
19. I think they are a lot alike.
They both have a core sense of decency and care very deeply about doing the right thing and helping others.

I've been an ardent Nader supporter and love Wes Clark. General Clark is the real deal. It saddens me deeply that the Repubs have tried to smear such a good man and many of the Democrats have jumped on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC