Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

how convenient: roberts file missing after being reviewed by White House

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:32 AM
Original message
how convenient: roberts file missing after being reviewed by White House
A file folder containing papers from Supreme Court nominee John G. Roberts Jr.'s work on affirmative action more than 20 years ago disappeared from the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library after its review by two lawyers from the White House and the Justice Department in July, according to officials at the library and the National Archives and Records Administration.

Archivists said the lawyers returned the file but it now cannot be located. No duplicates of the folder's contents were made before the lawyers' review. Although one of the lawyers has assisted in the Archives' attempt to reconstruct its contents from other files, officials have no way of independently verifying their effort was successful.


It is rare for the Archives to lose documents in its care and the agency has requested an investigation by its inspector general, said Sharon Fawcett, the assistant archivist for presidential libraries.

The lost file has also aroused some concern on Capitol Hill. Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (Vt.), the senior Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, wrote yesterday to R. Duke Blackwood, executive director of the Reagan Library, asking that he "continue to investigate thoroughly" the missing affirmative action file and "clarify the basis upon which you believe you have reconstructed that file." And Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) requested a Justice Department investigation because one of the agency's lawyers had seen the documents involved:wtf: WP 8/17/05http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/16/AR2005081601457.html?referrer=email
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. par for the course, lying, cheating, stealing.
the republicans never ever let us down now that our expectations of them are low enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. "Lying, cheating, stealing"
The repukes' definition of "honor and integrity"

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. sad, but true n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Filegate - didn't these assholes harass Hillary and her staff
about files that were in their possession? Travelgate and fingerprints and lies and innuendos and ....

Have I mentioned how much I hate these bastards! :argh:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. can you remember how much$...
they spent investigating the clintons? i can't that's why im asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I don't know exactly how much, but you can bet it was in the millions.
The hypocrites. :argh:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. i was thinking billions...
i might be wrong, but starr had a bottomless pit to work with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I wouldn't doubt it was billions.
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. they investigated...
the clintons throughout his entire two terms and the only thing they could come up with was "is". alot of money for that, huh?:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. too much money
:argh: And the lies of this admin keep on rolling off their tongues and no one cares! :mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. that's how reptiles hunt...
with their tongues. at least we care!!:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abbeyco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Was Sandy Berger there?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. What do you mean by that statement?
Are you slamming Berger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. look again
it was sarcasm:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Berger pled guilty to misdemeanor
Not a slam as much as a sarcastic joke, note the sarcasm icon even!

His sentencing is in September. he plead guilty to a misdemeanor. He's looking at a $10,000-$100,000 fine, and up to a year in jail, though from reading over reports of the trial, it seems more likely he'll get the lower end of the sentencing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abbeyco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. Thank you for clarifying
It was a sarcastic remark.

I'm not gonna get in a pissing war with anyone about being able to make a wise-ass joke every so often.

I'll just lurk like I used to and quit participating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. keep the sarcasm flowing :)
Hey as a fellow one time lurker, turned unabashed post-whore :) I hear ya. We all must not be so thin skinned and we have to be able to laugh at ourselves. (democrats) If not we're just humorless prigs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. don't quit posting...
i got the sarcasm immediately check my "look again" post where i pointed it out. you even used :sarcasm: in your post. every opinion is important.:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. nominated
Should be something that will point out how corrupt this WH is. This is the kind of thing the Rethugs tied Clinton in knots about for years and that gave Starr free reign to play with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
14.  - sigh - I should be used to this brazen BS by now, but I'm not.
Always a new low from the * admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. they never cease to amaze...
with how low they can go. the way i look at it is what's next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrioticLeftie Donating Member (909 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. The Bush Administration keeping information from us and lying about it?
I NEVER would have guessed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtbymark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. Can I spell Filibuster
hmmm only with spell check - how pathetic lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. filibuster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. Check Sandy Berger's socks!
Or, that's what the Repukes would say . . .

:eyes:

Don't forget the old standby of the Repukes - impeach Bill & Hillary because they didn't know their tax returns were in a box in storage . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. check the bulge in shrub's suit jacket...
they might be there.LOL:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Chris Matthews would volunteer to check the Shrub's bulge
Edited on Wed Aug-17-05 12:53 PM by Julius Civitatus
Remember he lusted over Bush's package during the flysuit "Mission Accomplished" photo op? What an embarrassment Tweety is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. LOL
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. Next they'll claim that Barney ate it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Rabble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
21. **&$&@* F**K!
Where does it stop?

When is it enough?

How far can it go?

Fuck you Bush, you fascist scum!

Fuck you.

Fuck you.

Fuck you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. and one more for good measure...
FUCK YOU * !! and go fall of your bike.:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
32. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC