Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems waste time in New Hampshire while Bush campaigns in Ohio

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:01 AM
Original message
Dems waste time in New Hampshire while Bush campaigns in Ohio
Bush is smart enough to be able to count electoral votes. Does NH ever vote Dem anyway? Aren't they proud of being the 5th column of the Northeast? Don't they allow Republicans to vote in our primary? :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. NH was closer than Ohio in 2000!
Al Gore got Nadered in New Hampshire in 2000. He lost it 48%-47%, while he lost Ohio 50%-46%. Writing off New Hampshire to Bush would be a grave mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trag Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not getting it this time..
No Ohio for Bush this time. Mark my word! My fellow Ohio citizens will not vote Bush this time. *crossing fingers*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. New Hampshire is a swing state...
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 12:08 AM by Davis_X_Machina
...and carrying it -- Gore missed by ~5,000 votes -- would have made Florida irrelevant, IIRC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think you're mistaken.
Or I am.

By my math, 2000 was 260 Gore versus 278 Bush.

NH has 4, so that would have been 264 Gore versus 274 Bush.

Correct me if my info is bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SadEagle Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. No, 271-267
Actually, 266 in the final count due to 1 DC protest abstaintion.
NH4 would have make it 271 Gore, 267 Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. 'Waste time'?
Um...it's a primary. They have to be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. we spend more resources there than it's worth
I guess this is a generic Iowa/NH bash, but our primary calendar sucks. I like Perot's suggestion - two days of voting, so people who work for a living have a decent chance to get to the polls, and we should have it all at the same time.

Iowa and NH give the corporate media more time to spin early wins and losses from small, unrepresentatives states. That hurts us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
returnable Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I agree
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 04:25 PM by returnable
The primary schedule is a joke. Two rural, northern, predominantly white states dictate who gets the Big Mo.

I've yet to hear a compelling reason to maintain this tradition. The only argument I hear is "Well, that's the way it's always been."

Bah. No time like the present to make a change :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathleen04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. There'll be time for OH
Our Dems will be there soon to campaign for March's Super Tuesday. Then our nominee will probably spend a good chunk of time there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. but the media will have already declared a winner
and will be giving that candidate kid gloves treatment, while they call everyone else a long shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC