Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If US attacks Iran, where do US ground troops come from? Draft?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rrrevolution Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:46 PM
Original message
If US attacks Iran, where do US ground troops come from? Draft?
Does anyone see a pattern of official statements and news releases regarding Iran similar to those that occurred before we attacked Iraq?

Is there any doubt where ground troops would be drawn for this next neo-con agenda item.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GalleryGod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Halliburton?
:shrug: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bribri16 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. The Young Republicans. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Iraq the plan is to have up to ten divisions of Iraqui troops
that is the plan,

Personally I smell a draft, sooner rather than later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Iraq - right after we declare victory
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. THAT is the scary part.
Rummy and the NeoCons have been lobbying for the use of their Cute Nukes. A phony crisis combined with the excuse that we don't have the ground troops would give them the opportunity to let this evil genii out of the bottle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Mexico, south america?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrrevolution Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Interesting thought, we have large military base in Paraguay
I understand that mercenaries are cheap and common in South America. Remember Iran/Contra?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
27. I think so too. I can see the US having companies of
Spanish-speaking soldiers, from Mexico and the rest of Latin America.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kahleefornia Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Don't need troops
to drop a nuke. He'll just push the shiny red button.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
32. We know the idiot can't wait to drop the "Big One." Jesus made me do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. It would certainly give him his place in history.
To be honest, I dunno for sure whether Bush would drop a nuke. I fear that he might, just because he can.

But I'd bet Rumsfeld plan is all air power. Shock & Awe and all that nonsense. He really thought that would be all he needed in Iraq, remember? These morons never learn, because they base all their decisions on ideology (and wishful thinking), not reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. I expect a prision amnesty for service program first.
Then, let's not forget the 'citzenship for service' ploy.

What really worries me is a MIHOP triggering martial law and calls for war on Iran ... hello America, you are all in the Army now. Anybody who disagrees with the junta gets nabbed by the use of the Patriot Act. Then they do with you as they please... hello America, you are all in the Army now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrrevolution Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Did You Notice that SSS Draft Registr Now Asks M/F?
Picked Up Selective Service System Official Registration Form at Post Office and noticed that it asks for a Gender M/F on the form.

Now why would they ask if they were not intending to draft females the next time around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yeah, I think they'd definitely need a draft...
Yet another reason we won't be invading Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Agree Razor
We may bomb but no massive ground invasion of Iran is possible.

Just ain't gonna happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gokar Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Exactly, massive bombing, shock and awe, no ground grunts.
Edited on Wed Aug-17-05 07:33 PM by gokar
They will bomb every known nuclear facility, every known military
installation and airfields. Thats it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I think more likely is
that Israel does the bombing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gokar Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Ya think? Is it cuz of what Israel did to Iraq's nuclear reactor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. magic pixie dust
maybe he will make an army from ants like Achillies did in the Iliad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. Our High and Middle schools.
We've been in Iraq since 2003. Doubtless will be there at least a year more, and that's with major political pressure to pull out quick. So, if we go into Iran, it's a good bet we'll be there at least 3 years.

Also, if we attack, it probably wont be for a year.

So, that means there's a good chance the soldiers dieing in Iran 4 years from now are down the street in YOUR Middle High school, right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrrevolution Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I Agree Except Believe attack on Iran in less than 6 mos
If attack on Iran is going to happen, it will not go through the pretense that it did with the UN and Iraq. It will be announced that it is underway and that will be that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. Attacking Iran is impossible for the US
Iran has (I believe) an army 500,000 strong with 750,000 in reserves. With that kind of troop power we would be forced to draft between 1.5 to 2 Million people (kids) in just one year alone.
If we go the Nuclear option (the real one not this crap in Congress) it will be the end of the world as China will most likely counter-strike.
I really hope someone slaps the shit out of shrub and tells him to shut the fuck up and stop making empty threats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gokar Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Whatcha mean is NO GROUND invasion possible...but that won't stop
the neocons from bombing through air. Don't believe Iran's air force
can stop the US air force for very long. US military is now perfecting
pilotless remote controlled drone aircraft, so not even the pilots
will be at risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. To begin bombing Iran without
a follow up ground force invasion would be absolutely pointless. That is a shrub admin policy though, doing things that are pointless and getting people killed in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gokar Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. Shrub does many dumb things, however both Iraq bombings
were followed by ground invasion. I hope he is not totally
stupid and send ground forces into Iran. That will result in
10 to 20 times as many casualties as Iraq invasion #2. You will
be looking at 18,000 to 20,000 dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrrevolution Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. Are Natl Guard and Reserves ready for a 3rd tour of duty in Oct?
Most National Guard and Reserves are due to come home in October having completed their maximum deployment requirements. So the only way to keep 138,000 troops in Iraq is to extend deployment for a 3rd tour for many of these troops.

That is why McCaffery said in another month "the wheels are coming off this thing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
38. another tour...but maybe not in Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. From "freedom trees" silly...
the chimp has been clearing brush, to make way for the planting. You certainly did not think that any * supporters would enlist, did you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. They'll come from Iraq
Remember how a few days ago Gen. Casey (commander of US forces in Iraq) said the numbers of troops in Iraq will be reduced this spring, and how Bush "rebuked him in private" the very next day? Those troops won't be needed in Iraq, but they won't be coming home, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. Voluntary Armed Forces are still viable!
Edited on Wed Aug-17-05 05:05 PM by jokerman93
Who will volunteer?

No problem!

Witness: a neatly engineered growing underclass of the American unemployed who desperately need a paycheck to feed their families, and the waves (legal and illegal) of poor brown people crossing into America who are willing to do the work real American's (stockholders) aren't willing to do.

Plan: Promise the unemployed an enlistment bonus to get them clear of all their credit card debt, then each year of their enlistment, send them back for repeated tours of combat duty until they are either broken or dead. Got to get our money's worth out of 'em after all...

And as for those poor brown people -- just promise them U.S. citizenship if they'll agree to go kill other poor brown people in Amerika's BushWars.

Big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. that is so cruel
but has more truth to it than I am comfortable with :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. I should have put the sarcasm sign on there. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. We do not need ground troops to complete the mission.
Destroying the nuclear facilities is all Im worried about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
29. Air strikes. Hey we got us a pilot in the Blight House remember?
I'm sure he has a custom made video game to simulate the experience.

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
30. Outsourced
The army will recruit in central and south america. It will be fought with mercenaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
31. The ground troops will be coming from Iran, moving West ... nt
Edited on Thu Aug-18-05 11:16 AM by bemildred
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
33. Israel
Edited on Thu Aug-18-05 12:35 PM by DoYouEverWonder
They are already in the region and they are well equiped and trained.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
36. I don't think we are going to invade Iran
We may bomb the ever-living shit out of Iran. But I don't think we are going to invade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
37. There's no ground invasion--you wouldn't send troops to radioactive areas!
Sending "our boys" into a region with nuclear fall-out fresh on the ground is too much PR liability, even for the uncaring Bushco fascists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateBlue Donating Member (470 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
40. Nuclear missile silos n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
41. and the answer is ...
America's poorer neighborhoods ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC