Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Had an interesting Conversation a couple of weekends ago... (Plame)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 08:32 PM
Original message
Had an interesting Conversation a couple of weekends ago... (Plame)
I've been debating whether or not to post about it, finally made up my mind.

I was at a wedding reception and met a lawyerly gentleman working in the DOJ. Polite and not freeperish really.

"Wow, what luck" thought I as I asked "So, what's the scuttlebutt on the Plame investigation?"

He immediately came back with "she was little more than a clerk in Langley."

"Aha! the party line" I thought as I said "Well then why Fitzpatrick taking so long for then? Isn't there a smoke-fire issue?"

"Well there's also that he might not have jack, after all he's investigating willful disclosure and she was a clerk." He started.

And then I said "Be that as it may, I think Fitz is investigating straight espionage. You know, like what they got the Rosen's on?"

He asked "What for?"

I said "Don't forget they uncovered Brewster Jennings too. That had to be at least code-word stove-piped."

I swear he winced ever so subtly, and asked me who Brewster Jennings is, which I explained and then he said "Well you certainly seem to be up to speed more than most people," and he politely excused himself to get a drink.

As he was walking away he turned back and said "Keep an eye on those guys."

To which I replied that if he ever needed to meet someone in a parking garage, I was his man.

-Hoot



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting
:kick:ed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DIKB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nice
Bring up the cover company being blown too, and you take all the wind out of their sails. The Repukes' talking points doesn't cover all the information, just enough to give the banshees something to screech about, nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. can you explain to me what...
the sentence "That had to be at least code-word stove-piped." means?

sorry, the phrasing of it just doesn't seem to make sense to me. i think i understand the jist of it, i was just wanting a specific meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Ok, fair enough...
Edited on Wed Aug-17-05 09:13 PM by hootinholler
Classified information has 4 basic levels of classification:
  • Confidential: Lowest classification level.

  • NOFORN: Do not disclose to foreign Nationals. Edit: This technically isn't a classification but a distribution restriction.

  • Secret

  • Top Secret


These relate to damage levels to the government would result from disclosure.

Within these levels of classification, you also have to have "need to know".

Now, stove-piping is a technique where information is developed by people who only see one part of a larger puzzle, and don't have need to know what's in other parts. To gain access to a stovepipe, you need to be briefed into it and given the name of the pipe, the code-word. You have to call them something. The more stovepipes you can see, the fuller picture of the puzzle you get.

This generally only happens at Top Secret, but isn't unheard of at Secret. That any given word like 'anchovy' is in fact a code word is classified.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suziedemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. So -- is this guy really on our side but can't speack his mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The guy is a carreer GS type...
I think he is worried about his retirement. I would have shrugged it off if he hadn't commented on his way out.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. What the wince tells me:
That the guys in the DoJ know where the whole thing *can* go, but they don't really want to see it go there and they are hoping that not too many of the members of the public get the minutiae of this and the meanings held within.

Something like what you said was something he just did not want to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well, WOW. Renews my hopes that Fitzy's got something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melissinha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-17-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Not necessarily
I hope that Fitz does has more, lets be frank we haven't heard a peep about what Novak told him.... that being said, I think that this gentleman was reacting to the fact that someone isn't just succumbing to the spin, and can see beyond the minutae of Plame's actual job and make a connection to the bigger picture which is Brewster Jennings.... I mean simply for the fact that she worked there in any capacity, her outing equals the entire organization's outing.

Its a big deal.

Thank God we have the ever so wise Air America hosts who do SUCH a good job at decoding and simpolifying matters for us. Particularly our Randi... and let me tell you.... the person that covered the whole Ohio Coingate thing before anyone gave it any credence was Sam Seder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. We haven't heard much of a peep about anything from Fitz
And that's as it should be -- Kenneth Starr, our last high-profile special prosecutor, was a sieve of politically-motivated leaks designed to bring public pressure on his investigative targets. And our slap-happy liberal media was only too happy to oblige, carrying Starr's water again and again so that it looked like he was really onto something, instead of obsessively pumping a dry well.

Fitzgerald, a real prosecuting attorney with real prosecution experience (how in the world did he get appointed?), is conducting his investigation the way it should be, without fanfare and publicity that can damage the innocent and let the guilty off the hook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
10. I wish you had said "Hey, thousands of people are well aware if that now
Edited on Thu Aug-18-05 01:10 AM by librechik
Thanks to whoever leaked to Novak." just to see his reaction

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I wish I'd had time to pickhis brain. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-18-05 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
13. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC