Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Coleen Rowley's Editorial on the Occupation.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 11:56 AM
Original message
Coleen Rowley's Editorial on the Occupation.
Published August 10, 2005
Minneapolis/St. Paul Star Tribune

snip

Sadly, if the analogy to Vietnam holds true, as it has so far, it will be several more years (as many as 12, in Rumsfeld's most recent guess), until the Iraq war dead multiply to fill another Vietnam-like Wall. Actually, getting out of Iraq, no matter how it is marketed, could ironically mark the first real, not just rhetorical, change that must be made in the global struggle against violent extremism.

From the firsthand perspective of Minneapolis resident Sami Rasouli, director of the Muslim Peacemakers Team (who spent the last several months in his native country of Iraq and is now on his way back to help Christian and Muslim groups with peacemaking and rebuilding efforts), ending the American occupation is the only hope of quelling the ever-worsening factional infighting and insurgency. His opinion is seconded to a large extent by British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who observed Aug. 2 that the presence of U.S. and British troops in Iraq is fueling the insurgency.

Ending American/British occupation of Iraq will also remove at least some ideological fuel of the violent extremism that has caused terrorist attacks elsewhere in the world. State Department figures have apparently shown the number of terrorist incidents soaring: from 2003's 20-year record of 175 incidents that killed 625 people -- to 651 such attacks that killed 1,907 in 2004.

Although a change in counting methodology may have accounted for some of the increase, it's impossible to now argue that we are winning the "war" on terrorism. Despite the reluctance of the British and American governments to accept the obvious, their own intelligence services attribute the growing violence to reaction to US/UK actions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

more@link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great post. Rowley will be a force in US politics.
And she makes an excellent point. Sometimes you have to just 'fold 'em' and walk away. This is one of those times. If we just looked at the present situation and forgot how it started, who started it (*) and so forth, today's logic would say, leave. It's time. Do it in an orderly way and be gone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC