I've been in on the Dean campaign locally for 11 months. My position regarding his candidacy has remained the same:
(1) The overarching goal is to vote Bush out of the White House and take our country back, and I will support whichever Democrat gets the nomination. NOT ONE of the nine original candidates-- much less Al Gore-- would have ever committed the acts of evil that the Bushites have done to destroy our country's proud heritage of civil liberties, to destroy our country's honor in the world, to destroy our sense of community (unless "faith-based"), to destroy the public school system and Social Security, to destroy the Earth's environment.... "Dear God, please deliver us from the Bushites" is probably not the daily prayer that W and Ashcroft and the rest of the White House Bible-thumpers have in mind, but it's a heartfelt cry to the Eternal nonetheless.
(2) Dean was the first (and for a long time the only) candidate to say that he understands that people like us are furious not just with the Bush administration but with our own political party and its leadership. He got it that a lot of us feel betrayed by the Democratic party leadership for reasons too numerous to go into and already abundantly discussed at DU. Dean's stance on this issue, and our response to it, has forced the other candidates to deal with it too.
(3) He was out there against the invasion of Iraq quite early, and unlike most of the others he doesn't have to explain votes supporting the USA-PATRIOT Act and the invasion of Iraq. I've been hoping all along that various Democrats -- perhaps my own senator, for instance -- would stand up and say that they were lied to and that they are sorry for their votes now, but those acts of humility have been few and far between. Dean's stance on this issue also has influenced the other candidates to be more forcefully articulate on the subject.
(4) He is fiscally conservative and socially progressive. (The media is wrong to try to paint him as a leftist, because that is just not supported by his record or his public statements now.) When he talks about balancing the budget, he speaks from experience. When he talks about health care for all kids, he's done that too.
(5) From the very beginning I've recognized that whether or not Howard Dean gets the nomination, his presence in the campaign and the amazing phenomena of Meet-Ups and the Internet will have meant that what he stands for will influence the whole electoral process of 2004. No matter what the headlines are tomorrow, I will continue to work for him until he either pulls out or is nominated.
(6) I think Dean is tough enough to stand up to the smears and lies of the Bush machine, but he needs our help in getting the truth out to the voting public. The "out of control" caricature was a media construct from earliest days, and like a political cartoon, they've stuck with it. I tune in to CSPAN rather randomly, but I've managed to catch nearly every debate and forum, and I am here to tell you that what I see and hear verbatim is very different from what I read in the paper or see excerpted on TV newscasts the next day. (I have little respect for the broadcast media as a result: Bill Moyers and Gwen Ifill are almost the only exceptions, plus Peter Jennings on a good day.) But Howard Dean just keeps on trucking. There was nothing wrong with the "I have a scream" speech that closing the door to reporters with cameras wouldn't have remedied. But our man is taking it all with an abundant sense of humor, and if he can, we can. We just have to remember to correct the record every chance we get.
GO DEAN!
~Hekate~
The true costs of war:
http://www.veteransforpeace.org/http://www.veteransforpeace.org/Arlington_west_121003.htm