Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Diebold's Election Division Jolted by Reliability and Security Concerns

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
feelthebreeze Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:12 AM
Original message
Diebold's Election Division Jolted by Reliability and Security Concerns

Voting Unit Proves Drag on Earnings and Corporate Image
Washington, DC - Diebold's Elections Division is in serious trouble. In this week's delayed second quarter earnings report Diebold admits that negative
perceptions of Diebold's AccuVote TS and TSx voting systems have produced 'lower revenue' and lower 'margin and earnings per share'. In its second quarter earnings report, Diebold had high hopes its Elections Division would prop up earnings in its troubled ATM division by 5% to 37%. These problems are likely to escalate as problems in the largest voting market in the United States, California, may cause Diebold to be excluded from that
market.
After a dramatic 20% failure rate in a recent Alameda County demonstration, over 18,000 TSX voting machines sit idle in warehouses all over the California. Some governments have refused to pay for the units until the problems are fixed. Election officials in Alameda County are considering another supplier altogether. Diebold's election problems come at a time when Diebold's core business is suffering from price pressure and the overall down trend in ATM deliveries.
Elaine Ginnold, Alameda County's acting registrar of voters, said problems reported in the recent tests have her seriously thinking about a switch of strategy in which the county would emphasize paper ballots using optical scanners rather than touch-screen devices.
Diebold provides election systems statewide in Georgia, and most of
Maryland. These states use an older version of the AccuVote(R) touch screen the TS6, but critics say even those machines are flawed and prone to screen freezes and other Election Day problems. Law suits alleging security and accuracy defects are pending in Maryland, and in Georgia Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney recently revealed an internal memo from Georgia Sectary of State Cathy Cox. Attached was a list of thirty problems with Diebold machines including lack of certification. Oddly Diebold is slated to deploy the troublesome and out of production TS6 in Baltimore City Maryland next
month.
"The problems seen in California are consistent with problems with the
Diebold election machines in other parts of the county. In Montgomery
County, MD the IT report on Election Day 2004 found that up to 12 percent of machines failed totally or partially on Election Day. The same types of problems seen in the California tests -- screen freezes, machine crashes, and error reports -- occurred in Maryland on Election Day," said Linda Scahde of TrueVoteD.org. Internally Diebold's problems in California may trigger another management
shake-up in the election division. Insiders say the recent departure of Gregory T. Geswein, senior vice president and chief financial officer was directly related to Diebold's California problems. Second-quarter net income was $33.3 million, or 47 cents a share, down 24% from $43.6 million, or 60 cents a share in the year-ago period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. HA-HA!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Is there a link? Where is this from?
I'm hoping it's from the Wall Street Journal... well, I can dream, can't I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. they should certainly pass ownership to a trusted public institution
private, profit-oriented companies should NOT be involved in our voting process.

I hope they use this as an excuse to get out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sepia_steel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. Where is this article from? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC