Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Flash! Cuckoo Bananas Disapproval > Approval in 19 Red States !!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:31 AM
Original message
Flash! Cuckoo Bananas Disapproval > Approval in 19 Red States !!!!!
Edited on Wed Aug-24-05 10:35 AM by Laura PackYourBags
Hip Hip Hooray !!!!

Congratulations to the intelligent people in the following RED States (Classified as RED on phony election result paper, that is)

CATEGORY A: WHERE THERE IS TRUE HOPE FOR US !!!
Indiana
Alaska
Georgia
Kansas
Missouri
Arkansas
South Carolina
West Virginia
Arizona
South Dakota
Tennessee
Virginia
Kentucky

CATEGORY B: IMO, PROBABLY BLUE TO BEGIN WITH, PRIOR TO BFEE FRAUD
Iowa
Ohio
New Mexico
Nevada
Colorado
Florida

http://surveyusa.com/50StatePOTUS0805.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. and two more states are dead even ...
exactly half of those polled in North Carolina and Louisiana disapprove of bush ... soon, your 19 states of the 31 will be up to 21 !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. You're right. Just fixed my subject line which mentioned 50%
instead of disapproval greater than approval. Now, for 2006, we've got to transfer that feeling of disapproval to congressmen who support the idiot.

It would be good to know precisely why people don't like him anymore and connect it to those running. We will probably start seeing repugs distance themselves from B** which will be very humorous if anything else.

But, what it all goes back to is if people are moving away from him because of the war, all the repugs have to say is my most hated line, "Well, Hillary and Biden and Kerry voted for the war too."

That is why, for 08, IMHO, I think we need a true anti-war candidate or it will all be neutralized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. They're probably moving away from him also because
of gas prices.

Bush once said he could talk OPEC into cheaper prices. Some folks are also confused as to why prices are so high when Iraq has so much oil (I kid you not).

Don't discount the fact that when one actually pays close attention to the Bush administration, one cannot help but notice the amount of lying that goes on.

Oh, and the more you observe George, the more it becomes clear that "the boy just ain't right."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I was just noticing on his monkey show about Iraq -- he was doing
some MAJOR co-oping. Iraq = Terror = I will not stop until we defeat terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. And again with the "9/11" this, and the "9/11" that.
I know that they're trying to counter the movement started by Cindy Sheehan, but what they're actually doing is whittling down their last remaining supporters by repeating the same lies that they got us into Iraq with in the first place.

There will be no fully sane folks left to support Bush's war by summer's end if he keeps up with the same tired speeches based on lies.

And rejoice, because they will keep it up, and every day, if possible because lying is the only thing left to them.

What's funny is how George seems to think leaning into the podium and becoming more insistent will somehow convince us that his same old lies are the truth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. You are so right ! Carry on, Little Boots !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rniel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Guac-a-Moron rides again
We're gonna smoke em out'

Stay the course

blah blah blah

your done!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Sorry not enough coffee today. "Guac-a-Moron" ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rniel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Bush is Guac-a-moron!!
Edited on Wed Aug-24-05 11:48 AM by rniel
as in Guacamole. El Presidente Busto! Jorge, that means George he he
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. And, yet...if we had an election today, I bet he'd "miraculously" get
re-elected. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. By 51 %
A true mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. No, not 51%. That is too close for a fraud operation. Remember
they pad enough in so they can say --- we won by millions we don't need no stinkin recount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. Surprises
Indiana and Kansas are a surprise. Both states are quite conservative,

When I was a KS Dem activist in the 80's and 90's there was a good base of Democrats in several areas of the state. At one time Dems had both a majority in the KS legislature and the governor. KS still has a Dem governor, former Insurance Commissioner Kathleen Sibelius.

The Repugs in KS have been taken over by unashamed theocrats. When I left KS in the mid-90's the whole Repug party was like a Sunday prayer meeting. They openly discussed theocracy and the rapture. They were truly kooky. The Sedgwick County Repug party ran a dial-up message line called the "Godarchy Line" right out of their headquarters. A daily message would tell people how government needed to be established in a godly way with the decalogue as the center. I imagine that the Repugs are still total lunatics today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well we are now down to the real stalwart states even worse than
Kansas, I guess.

These states still support the idiot..In order of who likes him the most


Idaho
Wyoming
Utah
Nebraska
Tex
Alabama
North Dakota
Montana
Oklahoma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Give them the George Carlin Treatment
Fence them off so the infection can't spread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Can't believe that Mississippi is not one of the deepest red ass states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Hmmm, looks like George did it again
He said he had "earned" political capital by getting re-elected in 2004, and that he was going to spend it in his second term. When this assclown says he's going to spend something, it usually means overspending. He's never met a budget in his miserable life, and the concept that there may be a bottom to his wallet has never entered his little peanut brain.

I hope that Democratic strategists are working on ways to tie this millstone of a man securely around the necks of every Republican candidate next year, because Bush will surely sink anyone who is too closely identified with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. "Democratic Strategists" Unfortunately an oxymoron IMHO
I wish the democratic party would contract with DU to create the strategy !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hmmm... how come Kerry didn't really campaign
in MOST of those red states?

I know he only visted my state once and that wasn't even for an open rally. It was to speak before a veteran's group and was a closed speech.

That really ticked me off about the Kerry campaign, specifically, and the Dem Party, in general.

How does one expect to flip red states if one rarely or never visits?

But, I digress. Yes, this is good news. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. You just made me think of something - a strategy. Know, for a
fact, that the repugs will rig the big swing states like Ohio and Florida. Develop a group of other red states that will make up the difference. Then, work like crazy to get paper trail there. These 19 would be wonderful places to start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Of those 19, there are three or four I think we could swing
with the right candidate (as in, NOT HILLARY).

A DUer from my state, Tennessee, is challenging our calls for electronic voting machines by filing a complaint that having non-paper back-ups in balloting is against our Constitution (and probably is). So, that's at least one state in which we can produce a paper trail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. that's great. I agree, not "Hellary" . I lived in the south. She is a
charactacture that they all hate. Her nomination would embolden them. Hmmmm, how about a nice southern gentlemen who southerners could love ??? President Wesley Clark !!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Well, I'd like to see a President Wesley Clark
but, ahem, I'm prejudiced. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'm in a Blue State!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-24-05 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Doesn't it feel wonderful !!! I live for when Texas tips !!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC