funflower
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-26-05 04:58 PM
Original message |
EVERY poll out there says people want dems to win in 2006. |
BlueJac
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-26-05 05:00 PM
Response to Original message |
|
and work very hard to getit done!!! :kick:
|
funflower
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-26-05 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. We have to tie every single, local republican trying to come across as |
|
moderate to the neocon junta and the rightwing fundies who support them. When you get to DC, there's no such thing as a "moderate republican."
|
LaurenG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-26-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I still think they wanted dems to win in |
|
2000 and 2004 too. :shrug:
|
pauldp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-26-05 05:03 PM
Response to Original message |
3. But who do the voting machines want to win? n/t |
kansasblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-26-05 05:09 PM
Response to Original message |
5. same majority that wanted Dems to win in 2004. |
funflower
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-26-05 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Here in Oregon, we WANT dems to win, but we keep sending a RW |
|
Senator back to DC because he his so good at passing himself off as a centrist while voting like Jessie Helms.
|
ThumperDumper
(368 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-26-05 05:12 PM
Response to Original message |
|
they kick the "election officials" kick everyone out of the voting area and "repair" the machines.
.
|
welshTerrier2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-26-05 05:24 PM
Response to Original message |
8. be cautious about reading too much into these numbers |
|
two points:
first, the "not sure" vote is far more than the difference between Dems and republicans ... i think most of those are likely to "lean" republican ... that's because Democrats are far more likely to oppose bush and are less likely to be "not sure" ... i think that many republicans are not sure what to do right now ... they know bush has screwed up everything but it's not easy to just switch parties ... so the poll does not seem to me to be all that clear ...
second, most national polls show bush's poll numbers plummeting ... but the Congress, Dems and republicans included, does even worse ... bad news for the republicans has NOT translated into good news for Democrats ...
the bottom line is that Democrats don't have their act together for the midterms and it's going to kill us if that remains the case ... the Party seems rudderless, leaderless and timid right now ... and on top of that, we seem unable to find any unity ... we've got big problems folks ... i'd be very cautious about reading too much good news into these polls ...
|
funflower
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-26-05 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. You are correct. If we had our act together, * would be spending a LOT |
|
more time clearin' brush in Crawford right now.
|
npincus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-26-05 05:26 PM
Response to Original message |
9. hopeful, but let's widen those margins |
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-26-05 05:29 PM
Response to Original message |
10. In 1992 the nation wanted a national health care plan. |
|
Didn't Spector win his Pug Senate primary campaigning for a national plan? (Don't remember exactly, but there was some kinda surprise like that that fueled the Clinton attempt in '93.)
|
shraby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-26-05 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
12. You just watch Bush's numbers go up |
|
before the mid-terms. They'll go up just like magic and so will the rest of the pugs.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:59 PM
Response to Original message |