Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I fear Dean will win NH because of Bush-supporters voting for him

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DaisyUCSB Donating Member (455 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:51 PM
Original message
I fear Dean will win NH because of Bush-supporters voting for him
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 01:12 PM by DaisyUCSB
or come close. I have friends at Dartmouth who say that Dean-voting Bush supporters are filling up talk radio.

And no, that's not the only reason I have for thinking that alot of them are doing that.

And yes, most of his votes will and have come from democrats. But a few thousand will be enough to tip the scales.

I think that there are 2 huge groups of republicans who will vote today. Moderate, centrist type republicans who are voting for Lieberman because they are upset somewhat with Bush, and those who want to see Bush win who are voting for Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not systems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Right...
just like he lost Iowa because of Bush supporters.

Dean can win against Bush because he has a pulse and human emotions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaisyUCSB Donating Member (455 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. the issue isn't whether Dean can win against Bush
the issue is whether they think Dean would be easier to beat than Kerry, Edwards, and Clark, and I think that is the concensus mindset among republicans

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Links or actual proof of this...
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 01:12 PM by alg0912
...instead of conjecture? A friend of a friend isn't good enough for me...

<on edit - cricket chirps - no links or actual proof forthcoming - whatta ya know?> :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. And what will you say isf Kerry sweeps
After all, Kerry was the one who voted to support Bush more often than not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. thank you....go Dean.....screw the bashers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaisyUCSB Donating Member (455 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. that is very inacurate, Kerry has one of the highest ADA ratings in the
senate.

Dean governed as a very moderate democrat. Of course you're changing the subject
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Just like Iowa --- oops that was Kerry.....with all the new registrations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaisyUCSB Donating Member (455 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Well I don't know anybody in Iowa
but I do in New Hampshire and if someone in New England has been listening to whatever station they play some guy named Mike Barnickel on they evidently would have heard it as well.

Do you think that all of the New Hampshire republicans are too noble to cast a vote that they believe favors republicans or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think you have it backwards
Kerry is the easiest to beat in Nov and the pukes are all voting for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaisyUCSB Donating Member (455 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Has 1 prominent GOP strategist or operative indicated that?
Because ALOT of them have indicated that Dean is there preference.

Just the other day the WP had an article that said the whitehouse political team least wanted to face Edwards and Clark, followed by Kerry, and that Dean was there favorite choice to face.

You can deny that the overwhelming wish of the right-wing establishment is foolish, but it's really hard to deny WHAT the overwhelming wish of the right is. I think it's clear that it's Dean.

And no I don't think Dean would be unable to beat Bush, nor do I think they think that

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ryharrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
38. ex-freaking-actly.
They've all said that Dean would be the easiest to beat. Do you really think that republicans let their strategy be known so easily? Of course Dean wouldn't be the easiest to beat. Lieberman, Sharpton or Kucinich would be the easiest ones to beat, with Kerry a close fourth. Remember about a month ago when they said they were most scared of Gephardt? Did anyone really believe THAT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Most of the Republicans I know here in IL fear Dean and Edwards.
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 01:09 PM by Cuban_Liberal
They frankly believe that those two would be the most difficult to defeat, because both can and do appeal to Independents and liberal Republicans. I also know many Republicans who intend to vote for Gov. Dean in the primary, if he is still viable, because they support him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think you have it backwards
Kerry is the easiest to beat in Nov and the pukes are all voting for him.
BTW, now matter what happens today Dean is staying in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. Just like all those Republicans who voted for Kerry in Iowa
Glad we Dems let the Repugs decide everything for us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. NH official said that GOP had to change registration 30 days ago to vote
in the primary today, and that there was very little changing of registrations.

Independents can vote today in NH by asking for either a Democratic ballot or a Republican ballot.

Don't know if you can register at the polls today in NH, but first time voting is up at one featured precinct this AM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. Somewhere Republicans are arguing about which candidate is more electable
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 01:08 PM by JVS
and outdoing each other to post positive things about the Democrats that the others plan on backing. They would all pick Kucinich as the least electable, but they are afraid that by picking their first unelectable choice they might not keep a truly electable candidate from getting the nomination, so they have settled for supporting a less unelectable candidate. The consensus is unclear so they continue to hurl hateful positive things about the Democratic candidates at each other. Ok, enough with the Bizarro world.

If we cannot agree on who can beat Bush, what makes you think that they can?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Thank you for attempting to fit logic into this debate
Some people act like the Republicans see things with clearer eyes than we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. I shouldn't expect anything better than threads like this ... sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. ACTUAL EVIDENCE states otherwise. Allow me to explain
37% of Kerry supporters in NH are not registered Dems. I heard a NH election official state yesterday that much of KERRYS support was coming from Right wing inde's.

There was bigoted Push Polling done in Iowa on behalf of John Kerry smearing Dean.

Do YOU have any actual evidence to support YOUR claim?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. All the more reason to choose Kerry!
If the majority of Indies are casting their preference with Kerry, that must mean he's the thinking man's choice to beat Dimson this fall.

It's all about the undecideds....Democrats will hang with whoever we nominate, but who we nominate will impact on the whether the undecideds split or move to support the Democratic candidate. A big plurality of Indies voting for Kerry should tell us that he's the man to beat Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. If they weren't doing it to give Bush a wishy washy easy to beat opponent
I might agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joanski01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. I heard a caller on C-Span
this morning say exactly that, only he said he was voting in the Detroit primary. He said if Dean was still in the race, he was voting for him because bush* will beat Dean easily.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I remember the same thing being said about Jesse Jackson
So long ago. I was a Young Republican at the time and it was commonly discussed in our group that those who were old enough to vote (we had two 18-year-olds in our group) should register as Democrats to vote for Jackson in the primary. Nothing came of it.

It is talked about quite a bit, but the types of people who actually make it to the polls are the type who take it seriously. And any organized efforts are going to be pretty minor in comparison to what the actual campaigns are doing that the numbers are insignificant in choosing a winner.

But go ahead and believe this bit of election folklore. Most people believe what they want regardless of what the facts are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
21. Bush is scared of Dean and Kerry, his comments prove that
He made snarky comments about both of them - they both scare him, elsewise he would have "remained Presidential and above the Fray"

He's right to be scared -- they are gonna get him.

ABB!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. You have to hope for a ton of Democratic turnout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
25. Let's hope so. If the puglies are stupid enough to vote for him...
probably the only one who can beat the goober, more power to 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logansquare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
26. If the Republicans were pushing Dean,
we would not have seen the "scream" hundreds and hundreds of times in the last week. They may not totally control mainstream media, but damn near, and if they want Dean, they have a funny way of showing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
27. Sounds like Rove propaganda
Edited on Tue Jan-27-04 01:41 PM by Woodstock
Logic would dictate that if you had a chance of an "easy opponent" you'd wait until he got picked before slamming him - or tipping your hand about him.

They doth protest too much. And so do you. It doesn't become Democrats to repeat Rove propaganda. Why allow someone else to pull your strings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaisyUCSB Donating Member (455 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. I'm not repeating Rove propaganda, why the heck to you have to say that?
Part of the reason so many democrats are turned off by Dean is the message that he and so many supporters imply that if you support his opponents or are against him your democratic purity is suspect.

It's unfair and rude.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
28. We have nothing to fear but fear itself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tryanhas Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
29. I have been worrying about this happening for over a month
That's why NH needs to get rid of SAME DAY REGISTRATION.

Anyone with any agenda can walk in and vote.

That's why NH is notorious for throwing a monkey wrench into things! It's not because they are independent minded, HE, HE, HE (that's the media laughing about NH voters), it's because Republicans can srew up the Democratic vote, and Democrats can screw up the Republican votes, whenever it's beneficial for them to do so, mainly in years when the other party has an incumbent in office!

It's not a secret that the GOP wants to run against Dean, and no matter what a lot of his people believe, it's also not a secret that Dean would lose MOST OF THE STATES THAT GORE WON, and get the floor mopped up with him by Bush, along with losing more and more seats in the house and the senate for Democrats.

Disagree at your own peril, but pretty much, even the Democratic party acknowledges this.

So, I have been going over this NH scenario for over a month, and I hope that it doesn't happen, but I wouldn't be surprised if it does. I want this thing to be fair, and I hope, for the love of God, that the GOP stays out of this thing and lets the voters decide, but they don't have a good track record of doing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. The same could be said of Kerry, who happens to be leading
That kind of messes up all your false logic. But I'm sure you'll think of another way to slam Democrat Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaisyUCSB Donating Member (455 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. My dad, a former DNC strategist turned advertising exec, has been saying
that for about a year. My disposition to disagree with your parents has had me giving Dean a real open mind, but the more and more I read about political science and practice in modern times, like at college and in books, leads me to believe that you are right, and that not only would he likely not be able to win red states, but that he could very easily be beaten in our crucial states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, and New Mexico.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
34. A couple of comments
1) We have heard people claim this same thing (with different democrats being the target). It would take a huge number of crossovers to make an impact on any final vote, and I don't see it happening.

2) I think that even if it is happening, the republican crossovers will lose out in the end - regardless of who they crossover to help. Final numbers showing a huge number MORE voting for democratic candidates than for bush... (esp if they were to do this in several states) will send a message to fence sitters. Several in fact. That folks are no longer afraid for "patriotic" (post 9-11) reasons to 'not support the president'. The additional media coverage to any (or all) democratic candidates if in state after state there are record (for recent years) turnout in democratic covereage would hurt bush. There are many reasons folks are increasingly on the fence about Bush. The country was already split. I think all of the candidates have an exceptionally decent shot at defeating bush.

I also think that if large enough crossover votes poured in to tip the primary results, then the negative consequences of public perception will further tip the polls away from Bush. Always a bit amusing when some republicans would be willing to cut their nose despite their face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adjoran Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
35. repubs can't vote in the Democratic Primary
only Democrats and independents. The repubs would have had to switch registration thirty days ahead. I've seen NOTHING to indicate that happened.

Is the campaign so boring we have to invent new things to worry about? Not to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaisyUCSB Donating Member (455 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. almost half of New Hampshirites are independants
40 something percent, and considering that it is a republican dominated state, that elects 2 VERY right wing republican senators. That ALOT of independants are independants in registration only. That want Bush reelected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. hardly
NH was one of the closest states last year, The Nader vote was higher than the Gore margin of loss. Many of these independents may vote Republican on the state and local level, but vote Democratic on the national level. Presidentially NH is split, and the independents are probably split as well. In fact I'd bet more independents are Democratic-leaning on the presidential level since Republicans probably have a huge registration advantage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
37. This doesn't happen in any appreciable numbers.
I have been an election official for almost 15 years, so I know a little about the system.

During the last primary, there was a concerted effort to change party affiliation and vote for McCain in the primary. You remember I am sure, people were to vote for McCain in the primary and then for Gore in the general election. It was spread in websites, like the DU and others, and by word of mouth. The end results, that I directly observed, were a few people changing their affiliation and actually doing it and even more confused voters that didn't realize they would have to be Rep for 4 years and not doing it.

As hard as it is to get people out to vote, I cannot believe that any effective voter fraud could ever be pulled off in this fashion. You have a better chance of herding cats. Generally, people are lazy and the motivated ones are too idealistic to change their party affiliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Guilty as charged. I voted for McCain in 2000
But unlike some, I didn't do it because I thought Gore would beat him easily. I did it because I knew that a Bush Jr presidency would be a complete fucking disaster, like his father's was. God, was I ever right :( But I never could have predicted the degree to which he would surpass Poppy in terms of complete shitheadedness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
39. Let the 'Pukes vote for him in every primary if they want to
And then we will have a decent nominee who will KICK BUSH'S LYING ASS!

Why does that seem to bother the DLC types so damn much? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snivi Yllom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
40. oh please
Dean was counted out, flatlined...well guess what he was never dead....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC