Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In your opinion, has Katrina dwarfed the 2001 terror attacks?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 07:22 PM
Original message
In your opinion, has Katrina dwarfed the 2001 terror attacks?
As a national disaster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
clark4me Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. In a word
YES!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H5N1 Donating Member (777 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Big Time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Already....
but when the whisper of the number of dead starts spreading i think its going to rock the world all over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. absolutely
but it's not he scale of the disaster or its source that are important.

To the difference from 9/11 Katrina has shown America's internal weakness in a completely different way. OBL doesn't need any WMDs to hit the US, he just have to wait to the next major hurricane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Worse than 9-11 but not as devastating as....
Edited on Sat Sep-03-05 07:27 PM by chknltl
...Bush becoming president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Agreed n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kdmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes
More people have died (most likely). It's spread out of a larger area, even though the media only focuses on one city. In addition, there was warning and our government did nothing. In fact, Bush just sat there while people drowned.

Hmmm OK, that last part isn't any different from 9/11. Bush knew then and did nothing while people burned.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Definitely yes, if only by virtue of the sheer area involved!
People outside of New York City or DC were very little affected by 9/11. I even know two residents of Manhattan who said that they didn't know anyone who was killed in the WTC.

But this disaster is having a huge immediate effect on four states and ripple effects elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. Without a doubt
this has wounded our image abroad and at home by exposing the truth. It is obvious to everyone that we are the so-called greatest only because of our weapons arsenal.

There is no pride from this and the only way to deal with it is to change. 9/11 did not ask us to think or change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's just so much worse, on every level.
though it's difficult to compare degrees of human suffering, it isn't fair to compare the damage and loss of life on 9/11 to the loss of an entire city, 90000 square miles of the south, people dying not because rescuers couldn't get to them but because the government sat around and did nothing, rapes and murders, forced to stand around for days with no water, food, supplies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes, but
it's not a contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Princess Turandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's a matter of definition of disaster...
my answer is no, because 9/11 was a man-made event and an attack by foreigners. I also live in NYC. I didn't know anyone who was killed on 9-11 but that makes little difference to me.

More people may likely die as a result of Katrina and the mismanagement of reaction to it, but it started out as a natural disaster in an area where only the timing of the disaster was in question. It certainly is one of our greatest national embarassments and tragedies.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zensea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. I was thinking yes, but I'm not so sure
I think 9/11 got deeper into the psyche of the whole country in a different way than this has. It brought a new element into American's consciousness.
I don't think natural disaster and man-made neglect goes into people quite the same way.
It's a little hard to compare though & I would understand someone who thought it was bigger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. The response to 9/11 was a source of national pride
The response to hurricane Katrina is a source of national shame.

The 9/11 attacks occurred in fully functioning cities with strong police and fire departments. Even when the towers collapsed taking large numbers of the city's emergency workers to their deaths, New York soldiered on. Except for the failure to mobilize the air force in order to shoot down the remaining hijacked planes, the federeal emergency response was immediate and powerful. Rudolph Guiliani became a hero for his coolness under fire that day but he had plenty of help.

Contrast this to the response to Hurricane Katrina where Mayor Nagin was force to face four days of rapidly rising flood waters, a crippled infrastructure and a demoralized police force and a federal response that was slow, incompetently managed and more concerned with political jockeying than saving lives.

Remember when Bush told us that "The grownups are back"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. Both are terrible, but 9/11 changed the way we live forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC