Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Debunking the WaPo: Blanco Requested Fed Aid on 8/28!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 01:00 AM
Original message
Debunking the WaPo: Blanco Requested Fed Aid on 8/28!
Debunking the WaPo: Gov. Blanco Requested Federal Aid from Bush on Sunday, August 28th - 2 Days Before Katrina Struck

In a well detailed letter to President Bush, Governor Kathleen Blanco requested that Bush declare an “expedited state of disaster for the State of Louisiana… beginning on August 28, 2005 and continuing.”

It appears there is some confusion over at the White House about when Governor Blanco requested aid and for that matter when she declared a State of Emergency for the State of Louisiana.

According to the WaPo, “As of Saturday, Blanco still had not declared a state of emergency, the senior Bush official said.” That’s rather curious because the letter from Governor Blanco to President Bush clearly states that she declared a State of Emergency on August 26, 2005.

Perhaps the two journalists for the WaPo don’t frequent DU, but they should, if they did they might have seen the link to the letter. And a quick visit to Gov.Louisiana.gov would have turned up the link to this: STATE OF EMERGENCY - HURRICANE KATRINA - August 26, 2005. The State of Emergeny Order clearly states that “The state of emergency extends from Friday, August 26, 2005, through Sunday, September 25, 2005, unless terminated sooner.”

It seems that these two documents do create a bit of sticky situation for the lies of the Bush administration, perpetuated by the WaPo in this story — Many Evacuated, but Thousands Still Waiting, White House Shifts Blame to State and Local Officials.

Behind the scenes, a power struggle emerged, as federal officials tried to wrest authority from Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco (D). Shortly before midnight Friday, the Bush administration sent her a proposed legal memorandum asking her to request a federal takeover of the evacuation of New Orleans, a source within the state’s emergency operations center said Saturday.

The administration sought unified control over all local police and state National Guard units reporting to the governor. Louisiana officials rejected the request after talks throughout the night, concerned that such a move would be comparable to a federal declaration of martial law. Some officials in the state suspected a political motive behind the request. “Quite frankly, if they’d been able to pull off taking it away from the locals, they then could have blamed everything on the locals,” said the source, who does not have the authority to speak publicly.

A senior administration official said that Bush has clear legal authority to federalize National Guard units to quell civil disturbances under the Insurrection Act and will continue to try to unify the chains of command that are split among the president, the Louisiana governor and the New Orleans mayor.

Louisiana did not reach out to a multi-state mutual aid compact for assistance until Wednesday, three state and federal officials said. As of Saturday, Blanco still had not declared a state of emergency, the senior Bush official said.

“The federal government stands ready to work with state and local officials to secure New Orleans and the state of Louisiana,” White House spokesman Dan Bartlett said. “The president will not let any form of bureaucracy get in the way of protecting the citizens of Louisiana.”

Blanco made two moves Saturday that protected her independence from the federal government: She created a philanthropic fund for the state’s victims and hired James Lee Witt, Federal Emergency Management Agency director in the Clinton administration, to advise her on the relief effort.

Clearly the WaPo could have done a better job with a bit of investigative journalism. They chose the easy way out and let the claims of the Bush administration stand as a statement of their headline, rather than refute the Bush administration’s claims, as I have above.

MORE & LINKS - http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=431
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Email this to the reporters on the WaPo story. Suggest a follow-up story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Sent to both reporters and WaPo editor.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Saw your letter!
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. The letter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's linked in the post on my blog
See the blog post for the links to that and her official State of Emergency Order. http://blog.thedemocraticdaily.com/?p=431
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lavenderdiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kick!
:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. Emails addresses for WaPo reporters - Let them know we know the truth!
hsus@washpost.com - Spencer Hsu
roigfranzia@washpost.com - Manuel Roig-Franzia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. Does anyone really think this is just sloppy journalism?
It's part of a coordinated whitewash to protect Bush's ass, if you ask me.

Reporters, whose full-time job it is to stay on top of news as it develops, to be privy to the "inside scoop" on the news behind the news, were unaware that the governor of the state publicly issued a state of emergency requesting specific aid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Whitewashing/sloppy journalism...
Failure to their job. All the same thing at this point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. Quick question.
Should be simple.

What did she request in the letter that she didn't get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerrygoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Read the letter. N/T
You decide... it's evident
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. IMO She shouldn't have had to ASK at all...
Bush should have had the BRAIN to actually figure out that help would be and/or was desparately needed and done the right thing immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC