Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"For days, Bush's top advisers argued over legal niceties..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:04 PM
Original message
"For days, Bush's top advisers argued over legal niceties..."
"...about who was in charge, according to three White House officials who declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the negotiations...."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9179587/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nagin was saying this on..
.. Sixty Minutes a little while ago..

.. that there was a problem deciding on which authority was to do what.

He said it was a bureaucratic nightmare.. and that they should have just thrown bureaucracy out the window and got people and aid in there immediately.

Sue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. This piece from GovExec. com shows what is supposed to
Edited on Sun Sep-04-05 07:10 PM by Gloria
be the hierarchy....with regard to Northern Command. It talks about "dual roles" and other potential sources of confusion....notes the National Response Plan

htt://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0905/090205nj1.htm


snip

As Hurricane Katrina and the catastrophic flooding of New Orleans illustrate, however, some natural disasters can wreak havoc on a scale that quickly overwhelms local and state authorities. In such civil emergencies, the U.S. military has traditionally been asked to contribute its unique capabilities in terms of command-and-control, communications, air- and sealift, search-and-rescue, emergency medical response, and sheer manpower. Since the establishment of Northern Command, however, the Pentagon no longer offers such assistance ad hoc, or as an afterthought to the military's primary mission of fighting wars. As one of the Pentagon's joint, unified commands headed by a four-star flag officer, Northern Command has meticulously planned for homeland-defense and disaster-relief missions and held exercises. In July 2004, for instance, the command participated in a training exercise that simulated how to respond to a Category 3 hurricane striking New Orleans and producing a storm surge that crested the city's protective levees and killed thousands.

During a crisis, often the first question asked of NorthCom, a relatively new command, is the most fundamental and difficult of them all. "The first question we have to ask and answer, along with all the agencies we work with, is, Who is in charge?" said Navy Capt. Brad Johanson, chief of NorthCom's Joint Operations Center. If it's a natural disaster like Hurricane Katrina, FEMA is the lead agency, with Northern Command in support. In a wildfire, the Agriculture Department will typically take the lead, through its National Interagency Fire Center. In the case of a terrorist infiltration where military assets are helping to monitor the situation, the FBI will usually be in charge.

"On the other hand," Johanson said, "a homeland-defense event such as a catastrophic attack using weapons of mass destruction would likely be NorthCom's primary responsibility, because we have a lot of unique capabilities in that regard. We know where that equipment and capability is, we know where it would need to go, and we have the means to get it there fast. And until you practice these scenarios, and see how a situation can escalate and evolve, with the lead-agency role shifting over time, it's hard to know who does what to whom, and when."

To sort out the complex and shifting command arrangements, and to smooth over the various seams between agencies tasked with responding to disasters, the Homeland Security Department created the exhaustive National Response Plan, which runs to hundreds of pages. In the event of a terrorist attack involving nuclear weapons or a radiological "dirty bomb," for instance, the plan envisions DHS providing overall federal guidance and designating the Defense and Energy departments, among others, as likely "coordinating" bodies to manage the federal response.

more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. The whole government is comprised
of people working under the Peter Principle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Should be renamed the George Principle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Hear, Hear!
The George Principle--who ever is least qualified will be appointed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Suggestion: "The W Principle" sounds better... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msgadget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Clinton fixed FEMA
to be a lean, mean, action machine. This administration's 'streamlining' has only created a geater bureaucracy just as we said when he was forcing it through post 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montana500 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. this post should be stickied
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. What does "stickied" mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:28 PM
Original message
as soon as the response was declared a disater they decided real quick-
it wasn't them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. A good son of the South predicted it all...
..."If the Confederacy falls, there should be written on its tombstone: DIED OF A THEORY." Jeff Davis, January 1865.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hidden Stillness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Disgusting--the People Who Knew Had to Turn to the Assholes for Help
This is one of the aspects of the thing that keeps sticking in my mind, making me disgusted all over again. Contrast the intelligence and competence of, for example, state and local Louisiana officials--who did not have authority to get things organized and solved, as emergencies of this type are Federal concerns--with Bush's refusal to even notice the disaster.

A couple of points on this: the first thing I heard about the Louisiana response to the hurricane was that the Governor, Blanco, had instructed her Attorney General to prosecute anyone price-gouging victims on any necessities; on the ball immediately. Second, after Bush destroyed FEMA by killing it as a Cabinet-level Department, adding it to that incoherent mishmash "Homeland Security" (I wonder which color this Alert is; assholes) and appointing a totally unqualified "friend" to "run" it, Gov. Blanco brought in, on her own, the former (and real) head of FEMA, James Lee Witt, to conduct a real investigation of the disaster, and how to solve it. She also started a foundation to raise money and distribute needed supplies to the victims. The National Guard was called in as soon as they themselves did not have to be evacuated for their own safety--by Louisiana request, that is.

State and local officials in all affected states were begging for help days ago, and Bush's FEMA director "just found out about it" a couple of days ago, that there were victims. When I think about how different the whole situation might have been, and the contrast between the competence of, for example, the Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco, and the neverending stupidity of the cocaine-addled asshole Bush and the "take over the world" neo-con space cadets--and that the good people had to turn to the assholes for help; and wait--it is horrible and painful, but it makes an enduring moral lesson for us. We are the leaders, and when they lead--disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakemewhenitsover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Will James Lee Witt be able to conduct a truly independent investigation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
11. some of this is hard to believe
if you need help from the Coast Guard,
and you call Fema on the phone, two possiblities,

one person answering the phone will tell you the
phone number of the CG,

someone else might try to pretend he is in command,
thus wasting the time till you figure out you can
call the CG yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
14. This is butt covering, a less damaging cover story.
Edited on Mon Sep-05-05 10:35 AM by bemildred
They did exactly what they were ordered to do,
in Bushworld obedience is expected at all times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC