CalebHayes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 02:27 PM
Original message |
Does this Huricane set up Mary Landrieu for a run in 2008? |
|
Edited on Mon Sep-05-05 02:27 PM by CalebHayes
Rudi vs. Landrieu?
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Just because her ox got gored, doesn't excuse the rest of her votes.
Silly question, really.
|
nothingshocksmeanymore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Who knows. She may have a populist awakening |
Totally Committed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 02:30 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Sep-05-05 02:31 PM by Totally Committed
TC
|
CalebHayes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Why doesn't DU understand that southern moderates win? |
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. many of us do.. BUT... |
|
..there are better known southern moderates.
John Edwards comes to mind.
Mark Warner...
|
CalebHayes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-06-05 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
17. I could agree with that... I prefer Warner but yes I see your point. |
Nicholas D Wolfwood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
13. Because maybe we're done being slaves to the South? |
|
I think we're better off going with a Midwestern or Western moderate. Sorry.
|
CalebHayes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-06-05 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
18. Who did you have in mind... Tom Vilsack? |
|
Come on they just don't have the charisma like southern democrats do. They are a special breed. They win for a reason. But I do think you have right basic idea. I could handle a Midwestern demo.
|
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message |
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. maybe but mostly not even veep |
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
kan2005
(6 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
No way! But I can see Al Gore perhaps being in the frame where I once had written him off for good. GORE/CLARK '08
|
Nicholas D Wolfwood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I'll take Nagin first. |
Booster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Hell, no. She had the chance to bop Bush in the mouth and didn't |
|
do it. Some of these Dems really irk me cause they talk really tough behind his back, but when they're face to face they smile and say "yes, Mr. President". No, I want someone with a whole lot of guts.
|
CalebHayes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Will someone anwser my question ? |
StellaBlue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 06:32 PM
Response to Original message |
14. If she actually lands a punch on * |
|
Wipes that smirk off his monkeyface.
|
nickshepDEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message |
15. She's going to be on the shortlist of potential VP's... |
|
Ive been calling that for a couple months.
|
Mr_King
(354 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-05-05 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. That's what I think... |
|
She probably won't run for President in 2008 because of Hillary. But I wouldn't be surprised if she was choosen as the Democratic V-P canidate in 2008. I'd be glad to see her on the ticket. She could bring back some of the soccer moms in the suburbs that used to be a key part of this party.
Sorry to say but ragging liberals won't win the Presidency anytime soon.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:41 AM
Response to Original message |