Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Come ON...you KNEW Malkin was gonna blame the Clenis for Katrina, right?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 10:36 PM
Original message
Come ON...you KNEW Malkin was gonna blame the Clenis for Katrina, right?
THE BLAME GAME
By Michelle Malkin
September 02, 2005 08:00 AM

Naturally, Bush's critics want to make this into a major issue in the run-up to the 2006 mid-term elections next fall. But the reality is more complex than the Bush Blamers will admit. They want you to believe that inadequate flood-control protections became a problem only after Bush took office. However, the New Orleans Times-Picayune has written numerous articles over the years describing the threat posed by inadequate funding for flood-control measures. Many of these articles, such as the one authored by Pam Louwagie on June 1, 1999 (see extended entry), appeared well before President Bush took office.

The Times-Picayune's articles make clear that throughout much of the 1990s, officials in Louisiana couldn't come up with state money needed to match federal funds. The resignation of Rep. Bob Livingston in December 1998 didn't help. (Livingston was chairman of the House Appropriations Committee; federal funding for flood control projects was one of his pet projects.) Nor did environmental laws, such as the Migratory Bird Act of 1918. (Construction on a hurricane protection levee in St. Charles Parish was halted for months because a great egret nesting area sat in the levee's path.)

One of Bush's critics cited a February 16, 2004, New Orleans CityBusiness article. That critic, however, chose not to excerpt these two sentences: "The Corps' New Orleans district in 2003 spent about $409 million on construction contracts, dredging and maintenance for the state's waterways, real estate purchases, private sector design contracts and in-house expenditures, according to the Corps. That more than doubles the $200 million the district spent in 1991."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wellstone_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. she looks like that creature in one of the Alien movies
moving in for the kill. She is fucking nuts isn't she?

Christ on a crutch, look at that face! Nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrioticLeftie Donating Member (909 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. What the hell is she doing?
Is a second mouth going to appear from the first one? If so, it'd have plenty of room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. YOU ARE RIGHT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I admit the movie was on when I saw this
it was on in the background. Why this woman is always so damn angry is a mystery to me. Her nonsensical rantings are always half-fiction and half crazy twists on facts. She's got a good income and whatever time she desires on tv for her rants. You think she would not be so insanely angry all the time


Good scree capture and photshop though!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oxbow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Christ! Don't do that!
That was f-ing hilarious though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. She's an ugly half-human Republican
besides missing the empathy gene -- she is ugly from the inside out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihelpu2see Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. I just saw the shameless hag on the O'Riely non"Factor"
following the repuglicant talking points to a T.... I truly do not understand how people like her get a job anywhere or get through college for that matter???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fencesitter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Howler Monkey!
n/p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. These are the same points
Edited on Wed Sep-07-05 10:49 PM by Zodiak Ironfist
That some "researcher" produced on the Luara Ingram show today. This is round two of smear, smear, smear amidst the complicity of the MSM and the silence of the opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Where are the comments about the article? All I see is
comments about her looks. Juvenile IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oxbow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-08-05 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. there's blame to go around
Edited on Thu Sep-08-05 01:33 AM by oxbow
I don't see why it's Clinton's fault that LA couldn't come up with its share of funds for the levees tho. The environmental laws holding up building the levees is a ridiculous argument too. No one could have envisioned that as a side effect. However, when Bush gutted the Army CoE and FEMA AND the national guard, any idiot could have told you the results that would have on disaster preparedness. He was the one who sat on his hands when all hell finally broke loose as well. Theres no excuse for the amount of glibness and self-congratulations that came out of the white house that first week. none at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KLF44 Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. So much for not the time to place blame.
What a skank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC