Heeding a call from Congressional Republicans, President Bush on Thursday suspended a federal law governing workers' pay on federal contracts for the Hurricane Katrina-damanged Gulf Coast.
The official reason -- and I am not making this up -- is deficit reduction. Talk about adding insult to injury ...
Bush, parroting the language in a
letter he received earlier in the week from House Republicans, suspsended the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931. The act sets a minimum pay scale for workers on federal contracts by requiring contractors to pay the prevailing or average pay in the region.
Suspension of the act allows contractors to pay lower wages.
Now, I'm all in favor of deficit reduction. I have been flabbergasted at five years of Bush budgets, causing nearly $2 trillion of debt. I have been appalled at the bloated legislation the Republican-led Congress has approved, including the recent $286 million federal highway bill that included an estimated
$23 million of pork -- for projects like upgrades to the National Packard Museum in Ohio -- or the recently passed energy bill, criticized for being laden with
pork and corporate welfare.
Given that, in the midst of a horrific catastrophe -- for which Congress has
approved $62.3 billion in federal aid, and may need to spend double that -- is now the time to be concerned with excessive spending?
"We must ensure that a catastrophe of nature does not become a catastrophe of debt for our children and grandchildren,"
said Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN) chairman of the House Republican Study Committee.
Think about the logic, though. Instead of adding $125 billion to the federal debt, suspension of the act will, what, drop that number to $120 billion? $115 billion?
Gosh, there couldn't be any other way to counter the effects of paying people the minimum wage for federal contracts. Like, how about forgetting about Bush's proposed
$70 billion of additional tax cuts, which overwhelmingly help the wealthy? Or how about pushing for a reversal of recently approved pork, as
suggested last week by Sens. John McCain (R-AZ) and Tom Coburn (R-OK)?
"Members of Congress should, at least temporarily, deny themselves a few of the comforts of political office and refrain from directing tax dollars to special projects in their states that might help their political campaigns but not necessarily the country as a whole," the senators wrote Sept. 7. "
In the past year Congress has found a way to fund thousands of projects of questionable merit. Perhaps a few of those dollars could have been better spent on activities that might have limited the impact of this tragedy."
***
The problem, of course, is that Republicans have <long opposed Davis-Bacon, charging that it amounts to a taxpayer subsidy to unions. Why not try to suspend the act now?
Arguing an anti-union line, the letter signed by 35 House Republicans points out that "Davis-Bacon regulations effectively discriminate against contractor employment of non-union and lower-skilled workers and can even raise total construction costs by up to 38 percent."
But the prevailing wage in New Orleans is just $9/hour for construction work, according to the Department of Labor. So who is really being hurt in the end?
Rep. George Miller (D-CA), the ranking Democrat on the House Committee on Education and the Workforce,
accused Bush of "using the devastation of Hurricane Katrina to cut the wages of people desperately trying to rebuild their lives and their communities."
Miller
told CNN: "President Bush should immediately realize the colossal mistake he has made in signing this order and rescind it and ensure that America puts its people back to work in the wake of Katrina at wages that will get them and their families back on their feet."
***
This article first appeared at
Journalists Against Bush's B.S.