Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An interesting filing in Wash. Post

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 12:56 PM
Original message
An interesting filing in Wash. Post
Check out today's White House Briefing column in the Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/linkset/2005/04/11/LI2005041100879.html
Word is getting around...not just to the astute bloggers anymore...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Southpaw Bookworm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Froomkin seems to be one of the good guys
I read his online discussion every week, and he's never been shy on criticizing the WH press corps. (He's not actually in the WH; he just reports on the reporters.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Froomkin in print can be just as bad as other mediawhores, but gets more
real in his ONLINE articles. I believe WP allows online articles to speak more truth because, as long as it isn't in print, it can't hurt their precious fascist regime much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Froomkin in print can be just as bad as other mediawhores, but gets more
real in his ONLINE articles. I believe WP allows online articles to speak more truth because, as long as it isn't in print, it can't hurt their precious fascist regime much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southpaw Bookworm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. That very well could be
Since I never read this column in print, I wouldn't realize the difference.

Thanks for enlightening me!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Judging by the number of anti-bush articles, even in conservative
newspapers, the press is really tired of being shut out. Hope it keeps up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. When a Capitolhillblue reporter said as much...
many DUers questioned his motives and veracity. OK, so this was only one guy posting several articles on the same topic over the course of several monmths, but apperently his sources were right. Check these out if you haven't yet:

Capitol Hill Blue: Bush's Obscene Tirades Rattle White House Aides
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7267.shtml

Capitol Hill Blue: Is Bush Out of Control?
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7218.shtml

"Bush's Erratic Behavior Worries White House Aides"
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_4636.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SillyGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Holy cow. Reading those scared the hell out of me.
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pushycat Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Bush lost is no excuse
One of the RW favorite memes is personal responsibility for our own economic future, our health, our souls, etc. Bush backs this hardline bull when it comes to all of us. When it applies to him getting his own damned info about the country he's supposed to be running all he can say is he wasn't given enough or not given the right info. BAH !!

Besides, if this is really happening, somebody in the WH isn't doing their job by allowing him to continue this way. 260 million Americans depend on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Saddam's aides were telling him
he was winning the war with Iran. Same story, when a leader refuses to hear the bad news. From the article:

"It's a standing joke among the president's top aides: who gets to deliver the bad news? Warm and hearty in public, Bush can be cold and snappish in private, and aides sometimes cringe before the displeasure of the president of the United States," Thomas writes.

In this sort of environment, Bush apparently didn't fathom the extent of the catastrophe in the Gulf Coast for more than three days after the levees of New Orleans were breached.
(...)
Among Thomas's disclosures: "Bush can be petulant about dissent; he equates disagreement with disloyalty. After five years in office, he is surrounded largely by people who agree with him. . . .


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good one
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. Looks like the "machine" looked around for a few days, couldn't
find a scapegoat who wasn't a victim or that would play - so now "Bush is dumb".

The sociopathic organ has found their pet goat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC