Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NBG '08 ~ Nobody But GORE!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:07 PM
Original message
NBG '08 ~ Nobody But GORE!!!
Pass it on.

Democrats, not sure how you feel about Hillary? Repeat this mantra, build a critical mass, and nobody can beat Al Gore in the primaries. This man is our fucking President (with a capitol P!).

Oh, and someone needs to talk him into running again too. (Details!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Patchuli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. So let's all ask! nt
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'd certainly pick Gore over any DLC shill being shoved down our throats..
....but that said, the very earliest I'm joining a 2008 campaign is in 2007.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'd certainly take him over Hillary, but I'm with you.
Way, WAY to damn early.

And I think he's feeling too free to want his wings clipped again. I'm not sure I want to lose him as that voice of reason, you know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I know what you mean...
but I think we can handle the mid-terms AND think about '08 simultaneously. I mean c'mon!

I've just been feeling resistant to the sense I get that there's an attempt to foist Hillary upon us, either by the right wing, or by the MSM (or, is there a difference?).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. But Gore is more DLC than anyone! He, Summers and Rubin agreed on
Edited on Tue Sep-13-05 10:13 AM by 1932
most everything and most everything they agreed upon was pro-corporatocracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Style is more important than substance for many people
Forget that Joe Lieberman had a more liberal voting record than John Edwards. What reaaly counts for some is what politicians say, not what they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Clearly they weren't weighting Lieberman's pro-Wall St votes.
Edited on Tue Sep-13-05 10:29 AM by 1932
I read Clinton's SEC chairman Athur Levitt's book and Lieberman comes across over and over again doing huge favors for accounting industry and for Wall St.

And those were all things he did BEFORE Gore picked him for the ticket.

So, another example of Gore's DLC-ness: his VP selection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hope he runs
I'll vote for him if he runs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. I would love him to be our president
He's easily one of my top 5 people I'd want to be president. That said, I don't think he even wants it anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Count me in.
It's never too early to speculate. It's practically a sport.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Same here
I really hope he does. *sigh* I'm not hoping or anything because anything can change. I just love Gore and think he's one of our most progressive's which is what we'll need in 2008 to clean up Bush's messes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. He is the most progressive Democrat
... right behind Paul Wellstone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. I strongly disagree with that characterization.
I have read books by Stiglitz and Arthur Levitt -- both members of the Clinton white house -- who paint Gore as a big friend of Wall St interests that made the wealthy wealthier at the cost of a fair, tranparent marketplace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southsideirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. Al Gore = the only candidate in '08. For a clear choice not a consensus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. Focus on election reform, 2006, then NBG
Edited on Mon Sep-12-05 11:00 PM by politicasista
And as much as I like the Clintons, I don't want Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Same here
I really like Hillary and I don't want her either since she isn't quite as progressive as Gore. I think we have a chance of taking back the country since not everywhere has voting machine's and they have paper trails (my town does) and I think we could really do a lot of work in 2006. Can we prove Kerry/Edwards won? I don't know, but at least we can make it truly fair for 2008 and that is what is important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I'm all about '06!!
Hey, I'll show up and cast my vote.

But, but, but...NBG!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-05 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. It's apparently not too early to foist Hillary upon us...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-13-05 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
15. He looks better to me than anyone else on the DEM horizon.
If the vote machine fraud could be cleared up, he would be elected by a sizable majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC