Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gore: Katrina response shouldn't be to cut taxes & environmental safegards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:20 PM
Original message
Gore: Katrina response shouldn't be to cut taxes & environmental safegards
Edited on Sat Sep-17-05 03:30 PM by AlGore-08.com
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/7c972c82-27b2-11da-ac98-00000e2511c8.html

Katrina shows effect of climate change, says Gore
By Fiona Harvey, Environment Correspondent

Hurricane Katrina offered “a taste” of the disasters, and the response to them, that the US could expect as a consequence of climate change, former vice president Al Gore said on Saturday.

He cited recent research that found warmer sea surface temperatures - a result of global warming - had strengthened hurricanes and major storms around the world. Speaking at the Clinton Global Initiative in New York, where climate change was one of the key issues under discussion, he also criticised those politicians he said wanted to trim government too far, as weak government was incapable of responding adequately to emergencies.

He said: “Katrina is the first sip, the first taste, of a bitter cup that will be proffered to us over and over again. It is up to us , and it does involve accepting that there is a legitimate role for government.”

Mr Gore spoke out against the proposed suspension of certain environmental regulations, which some have argued are necessary to deal with Katrina's aftermath: “The response to Katrina should not be to suspend environmental laws and to cut taxes once again.”

(more... )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just a suggestion...
You may want to reword your heading. It doesn't make sense.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I hope that makes more sense - - there's only so many characters allowed
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. What has Gore said about running in 2008 and how hard would it
be to get him to run? In your opinion, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. We need him now more than ever!
Just curious, what does eom mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sigh.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. We need to re-elect President Gore!
I'm all for a Gore/Kerry ticket in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I would love to see Gore elected . . . with a big if . . .
IF he has sufficiently divorced himself from the corporatocracy, and will run and govern free of corporate influence . . . if he announces and says that he won't accept any corporate contributions of any kind, I will give him every ounce of support I can muster and every dollar I can spare . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. When he ran in 2000, he accepted spending limits & refused PAC money
He also had a plan to publicly finance campaigns - - speech excerpt below.

http://www.algore.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=89&Itemid=84

Speech Transcript: Speech On Political And Campaign Reform at Marquette University, WI
Monday, 27 March 2000

(snip)

Experience has shown us that the best path to political reform is step-by-step-and passing McCain-Feingold is the critical first step.

But we must go further in the term of the next President.

The next important steps are tough new lobbying reform, publicly-guaranteed TV time for debates and advocacy by candidates, and a crackdown on issue advocacy ads.

I will propose and fight for a law requiring monthly disclosure of all lobbyists' activities, posted on the Internet and fully accessible to the public. Every citizen will be able to find out to whom lobbyists have contributed, and the specific meetings they've gained to influence specific pieces of legislation.

Full disclosure of lobbying activities can help dry up the supply of special-interest money. Free TV time can help reduce the demand for it.

I said more than ten years ago-and I still believe today-that "broadcasters are given a government license for exclusive use of the public airwaves. In return, they are expected to operate in the public interest."

I will strongly advocate the approach developed by Paul Taylor. Every broadcaster should give every candidate for federal office five minutes of air time a night in the last thirty days before the general election. Cable operators should work with their content providers to establish a similar practice.

And if broadcast stations air independent issue ads, I believe they should be required by the FCC to give-for free-the same amount of air time to both candidates in the race. If broadcasters wanted to avoid the requirement to give such free time, all they have to do is say no to the special interests who want to influence our campaigns. I will petition the FCC to issue a ruling that recognizes this requirement as a necessary part of broadcasters' obligation to serve the public. And I will appoint commissioners who-like some already on the FCC-believe the public interest must be protected in new ways, in light of new threats facing it.

Step by step, we can reduce the influence of special-interest money in campaigns. But our ultimate goal must be to eliminate it altogether.

Some believe the answer is a system of public financing for Congressional and Presidential elections, like the one I first supported in the 1970's.

However, bills to establish public financing of Congressional elections have been introduced in every single session of Congress for a quarter-century-and not a single comprehensive public financing proposal has passed Congress. Almost none have been approved by even one Congressional Committee.

It is time for a new approach to achieve the fundamental goal of freeing our democracy from the coils of special-interest cash.

So I propose the creation of a non-partisan Democracy Endowment-to follow up on the urgent reform of our campaign finance laws by McCain-Feingold with a revolutionary change to further safeguard our self-government in the 21st Century.

The Democracy Endowment will raise more than $7 billion over seven years, and then, with the interest and the returns on investment, finance Senate and House general election campaigns-with no other contributions allowed to candidates who accept the funding.

Let me be clear: this is a non-partisan endowment for our common democracy. You can't give to any one party; you can't give to any one candidate. Every qualified candidate will have access to these funds according to a formula that is based on the district or state in which they are running. The views of the donor will have absolutely no influence on the views of the recipient. In this way, we will break the connection between the giving of money and the gaining of influence in these election contests.

To raise the funds for the Endowment, there will be a 100 percent tax deduction for any individual or corporation that contributes-on a first-come, first-serve basis-until the Endowment is filled. And as soon as it is filled, the tax deduction will sunset.

As President, I will work aggressively to secure these funds-and I will seek the help of every corporation, every union, every major foundation, every dot-com millionaire and every other citizen in America.

If the endowment is not filled within seven years, the difference will be made up by free TV time-required of broadcasters as a condition for their licenses.

This will provide a powerful incentive for broadcasters to air public service announcements that will help fill the fund.

From McCain-Feingold to lobbying reform and a crack-down on special interest issue ads, to the Democracy Endowment, our cause is nothing less than the most sweeping campaign finance reform in history. And it will not be easy. For just as the tobacco companies battle every major measure to reduce teen smoking-just as the HMO lobbyists fight against measures to ensure the best health care, not just the cheapest-they and all the other special interests will be joined together in waging a mighty war to preserve their place and their privileges under the current political system.

But let us understand what is at stake here-our faith in our own self-government, and ultimately, the very future of our democracy.

If we believe in the ideal of one person, one vote, as my father so strongly did-then let us fight for the reforms that make sure every vote counts equally.

If we believe in a government of the people, by the people, and for the people-then let us have an election process of the people, by the people, and for the people.

Some candidates portray themselves as being above the will of the people. They forget that, in spite of the system's degradation, their power still derives from the will of the people. I need you to keep raising your voices in a grassroots movement for reform. I need you to give me your mandate to carry this banner forward.

Together, we can end the money chase, and create a system where we pursue our highest ideals. And if you entrust me with the Presidency, I make you this pledge: I will fight for political reform. I will fight for you. I will fight to give the power in our politics back to the people. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Jeez! Still with the Nader crap about the coporatocracy, blah blah blah..
I'll take Gore any way I can get him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. you dismiss the corporatocracy at your peril . . . n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drummo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It's far left-wing crap.
Edited on Mon Sep-19-05 02:21 PM by drummo
Google is a corporation. Apple is a corporation. IBM is a corporation. Intel is corporation.
And no reasonable person would say that the would be a better place without them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-17-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Gore is refreshing. It's so nice to hear that someone still cares about
the environment like he does. I'd love to hear even more from Al Gore in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC