Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is it called BushClintonKatrinaFund.org?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dhinojosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 11:31 AM
Original message
Why is it called BushClintonKatrinaFund.org?
Why is Bush the first name? He's not a bad ass like Clinton is. WTF? In fact it should be called ClintonIsAFuckingBadAssKatrinaFund.org. Even more so, they should have a LiberalKatrinaFund.org and a ConservativeKatrinaFund.org and have those two try to outgive one another. That would raise so much money it would kick ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. You mean why does Bush get to be on top?
Have to ask the Big Dog that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Picky, picky.
Alphabetical order?

Presidential order?

Age before beauty?

Who cares why Bush is first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. True, but...
something tells me the decision was not a coin toss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Does it matter?
The name of the fund seems utterly inconsequential compared to the reason it was created in the first place.

There are so many other more-important things to deal with out there that nitpicking the name of a charitable organization seems ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. maybe not
OP isn't suggesting it's more important than the cause itself.

It's a 100% intentional, subtle PR move. Though to us it may not matter, I bet the GOP wouldn't budge an inch on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yeah, well. Consider the alternative below.
Props to Village Idiot for pointing out what should have been obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daninthemoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah! How many donate for Bill vs how many for ghwb?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. If they called it "ClintonBush..."
People would think Hillary was involved?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Hehe.
Very good point. The jokes would never end. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shipwack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. To be family friendly
If it was called "ClintonKatrinaBush Fund", the Christian Coalition would complain about that name being broadcast during primetime...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hopein08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-19-05 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wasn't the tsunami one in reverse order?
i.e. wasn't it the Clinton Bush tsunami whatever? Maybe I'm wrong but I think I remember reading that.

My question is, what exactly are they doing with the money that is collected by that fund? Who's in charge? Who decides where it goes?

And, in seeing the somewhat joking nature of this thread, I think I'll share a joke that my very left-leaning history professor told me when I had him for American history. It may be ever so slightly right-leaning but it's true and came from a man who detested Republicans. So, I hope I don't offend anyone, I just thought I'd share.:pals::pals:

Q: "What will history call the Clinton years?"

A: "Sex between the Bushes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC