Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Good Start on Defeating Photo ID Proposal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 08:00 AM
Original message
Good Start on Defeating Photo ID Proposal
See 3 prior posts, links at http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=340x196

http://www.conyersblog.us/archives/00000248.htm

Blogged by JC on 09.20.05 @ 09:57 PM ET

Good Start on Defeating Photo ID Proposal

We made very good progress on the first day, thanks in no small part to your help. We recieved lots of press, including an AP story. We got great editorials in both the New York Times and the Washington Post. The New York Times was particularly strong, writing "the bombshell recommendation is for the states to require voters to have drivers' licenses or a government-issued photo ID. That would not be a great burden for people who have drivers' licenses, but it would be for those who don't, and they are disproportionately poor, elderly or members of minorities. These voters would have to get special photo ID's and keep them updated. If they didn't have the ID's, their right to vote would be taken away. The commission recommends that the cards be free. But election administration is notoriously underfinanced, and it is not hard to imagine that states would charge for them. Georgia is already charging $20 and more for each of its state voter cards."

I also participated in a press conference today with Senators Obama and Dodd and Rep. John Lewis where we announced our resolution opposing the ID requirement. Our petition to the Speaker and Majority Leader is going well, with approximately 4,000 signatories already. Please let your friends and family know about this so we can keep the momentum going in this critical fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. H.CON.RES.247 & S.CON.RES.53
Edited on Wed Sep-21-05 08:17 AM by paineinthearse
From Thomas.

There are two resoultions filed in Congress, S.CON.RES.53 & H.CON.RES.247:

S.CON.RES.53
Title: A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of Congress that any effort to impose photo identification requirements for voting should be rejected.
Sponsor: Sen Obama, Barack (introduced 9/20/2005) Cosponsors (19)
Latest Major Action: 9/20/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration. COSPONSORS(19), ALPHABETICAL : (Sort: by date)

Sen Akaka, Daniel K. - 9/20/2005
Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham - 9/20/2005
Sen Corzine, Jon S. - 9/20/2005
Sen Dayton, Mark - 9/20/2005
Sen Dodd, Christopher J. - 9/20/2005
Sen Dorgan, Byron L. - 9/20/2005
Sen Durbin, Richard - 9/20/2005
Sen Feingold, Russell D. - 9/20/2005
Sen Harkin, Tom - 9/20/2005
Sen Kennedy, Edward M. - 9/20/2005
Sen Kerry, John F. - 9/20/2005
Sen Lautenberg, Frank R. - 9/20/2005
Sen Leahy, Patrick J. - 9/20/2005
Sen Mikulski, Barbara A. - 9/20/2005
Sen Pryor, Mark L. - 9/20/2005
Sen Reid, Harry - 9/20/2005
Sen Salazar, Ken - 9/20/2005
Sen Stabenow, Debbie - 9/20/2005
Sen Wyden, Ron - 9/20/2005

H.CON.RES.247
Title: Expressing the sense of Congress that a requirement that United States citizens obtain photo identification cards before being able to vote has not been shown to ensure ballot integrity and places an undue burden on the legitimate voting rights of citizens.
Sponsor: Rep Lewis, John (introduced 9/20/2005) Cosponsors (19)
Latest Major Action: 9/20/2005 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. COSPONSORS(19), ALPHABETICAL : (Sort: by date)

Rep Brown, Sherrod - 9/20/2005
Rep Conyers, John, Jr. - 9/20/2005
Rep Doggett, Lloyd - 9/20/2005
Rep Emanuel, Rahm - 9/20/2005
Rep Fattah, Chaka - 9/20/2005
Rep Filner, Bob - 9/20/2005
Rep Green, Gene - 9/20/2005
Rep Grijalva, Raul M. - 9/20/2005
Rep Hinchey, Maurice D. - 9/20/2005
Rep Honda, Michael M. - 9/20/2005
Rep Hoyer, Steny H. - 9/20/2005
Rep Kucinich, Dennis J. - 9/20/2005
Rep McDermott, Jim - 9/20/2005
Rep McGovern, James P. - 9/20/2005
Rep Neal, Richard E. - 9/20/2005
Rep Payne, Donald M. - 9/20/2005
Rep Schakowsky, Janice D. - 9/20/2005
Rep Serrano, Jose E. - 9/20/2005
Rep Stark, Fortney Pete - 9/20/2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bee Donating Member (894 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. signed.
and kicking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. kicking
Go Conyers go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks, do we have a second?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-21-05 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I guess not.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Kicking
Why not more interest people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC