John Edwards says to oppose Roberts. Good for him.

[madfloridian]

Dear Friend,

The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is the most important judge on the most important court in our country, responsible for protecting and upholding the rights and freedoms outlined in our Constitution. I have carefully reviewed Judge John Roberts' testimony and listened to him give unsubstantial, boilerplate answers and avoid answering even the most basic questions about his own views today.

Based on everything I have seen and read from Judge Roberts' work in the Reagan Administration, his past opinions, and his most recent testimony, I wanted you to be the first to know that I must oppose his nomination to be our country's Chief Justice.

I do so because we do know the views and positions he took prior to the recent hearings. Judge Roberts opposed efforts to remedy discrimination on the basis of sex and race. He opposed measures to protect voting rights. He denigrated the right to privacy and a woman's right to choose. He wanted to allow Congress to strip away courts' jurisdiction over controversial subjects.

Although he has presented himself as a supporter of judicial restraint, I do not see enough evidence that Judge Roberts would show restraint when his own political commitments are at stake. In light of his past positions, I believe he had an affirmative obligation to make the case to those who might confirm him that he repudiates the positions that he had previously advocated in his professional career. He made a choice and refused to meet that obligation. I cannot support someone who I am not convinced will preserve the liberties and freedoms that are enshrined in our Constitution and our laws.

Please join me in fighting for the principles and values that each of us cherish. Contact your Senators and tell them to vote no on Judge Roberts' nomination.

John

[madfloridian]

1. And Howard Dean came out last week saying to oppose him.

http://www.democrats.org/a/2005/09/dean_what_i_thi.php

I know Harry Reid said he would vote no, but Leahy is now a yes. Kennedy no.

I am worried about this issue.

[DemNoir]

2. Yeah right, what courage

Would he vote no if he still had a vote? I kind of doubt it.

[madfloridian]

4. When our Democrats see attitudes like that....

I wonder how they feel.

I say good for him for opposing.

[Cha]

5. Maybe Edwards has learned

a fucking thing or two since the 2004 railroad.

I'll give him the benefit of the doubt before I give roberts the benefit like leahy is.

[Cha]

3. So Edwards is smarter than

that ol' timey Senator from Vermont, patrick leahy!

[madfloridian]

6. What's with Leahy on this?

I was surprised at him.

[hopein08]

7. I like Edwards through and through BUT he voted FOR Roberts....

twice when Roberts got on the federal bench. If that's the full email, and I haven't checked mine yet, he doesn't really explain that. But I believe he was one of four Democrats to vote for Roberts in committee at the time. I'd like to know what exactly has changed.

[Der Blaue Engel]

8. Thank you, John

Another honorable man.