Mairead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-22-05 06:08 AM
Original message |
"they died of unexploitability" |
|
'When I asked, naïvely, why the World Bank, a quasi-aid organisation, would push loans that were unwelcome or controversial, I was reminded that "the World Bank is a bank. Selling loans is its business." "It also has the job," someone said "of creating the conditions in which private banks can make profitable loans."{emph. added}
Since no bank could collect interest from subsistence fishermen (they stop when they have enough), some in the group {of first- and third-world ecology activists at a UN Shrimp Tribunal} felt that all World Bank loans were ultimately aimed at opening new loan markets by destabilizing what was left in the world of self-sufficient communities and turning their inhabitants into dependent individuals. In other words, self-sufficient people were deliberately pushed off the land to make way for borrowing, interest-paying investors. If those people happened to starve before enough investors materialized to provide them with cash income, then they died of unexploitability.'
Barbara Garson, Money Makes The World Go Round.
If you've ever wondered how globalised money works, buy a copy of this book. It went out of print quickly of course, but it's still available from remainder sellers. You'll come away with a better understanding of economics, bubbles, and globalisation tragedies. She bends over backwards to be fair, but she also doesn't hide or gloss over the ignorance, uncaring self-interest, and predation she runs into.
|
BlueEyedSon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-22-05 06:17 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Amazon has it in paperback and downloadable |
Mairead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-22-05 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. Nice! It must have come back into print |
|
I know there's at least one econ prof who's using it as a text.
|
applegrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-22-05 06:22 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Oh - I think that is very true. Why there should not be one "neocon" |
|
model of an economy imposed on the world. That is fascist Utopianism.
|
The Backlash Cometh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-22-05 06:39 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Sounds like chaos economics. |
|
Think about it guys, now that we're paying more of our medical insurance and have less chances of recovering losses from product liability, or bankruptcy, we've been pretty destabilized too.
|
Mairead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-22-05 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Interesting that you say that. |
|
Harvey McKay, author of 'Swim With The Sharks' remarked that it doesn't really matter whether (he said it differently, but this is what he meant) times are good or bad for working people, the wealthy would become more wealthy regardless -- they simply switch techniques. The only thing they require is political stability, economic instability for the proles is fine for them.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:58 PM
Response to Original message |