Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it just me, the back on the booze story..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
back2basics909 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:00 PM
Original message
Is it just me, the back on the booze story..
Could be my tin-foil hat moment, but i have a bad feeling about it. The sources, two of them, must be close to the president. They have to be. The potential for a plant is high. Maybe not, but you have to admit we WANT to beleive it.

If they could get the story to run and show it to be wrong, they could frame a picture of an anti-Bush Media. We know from experiance that frame works with his base, and it would seem to confirm their belief.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. You have to take all the sudden "leaks" with a grain of salt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. it's just you
anyone who has any experience of alcoholics or drug addicts knows that he's been using for a long time now, the man falls down more than gerald ford or boris yeltsin

any "plant" is to minimize the severity of his addiction, since we are supposed to believe he only started drinking after katrina, which is patently untrue to anyone w. two eyes in their head

the story is wrong only in that * is clearly using much much more than described in the story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Drinking is a given ...
Frankly, I think he is back on the coke ...

I saw the press conference on "terrorism" (justifying the military occupation of Iraq) today, and while he is pretty much always a disaster when he goes off script, he was VERY shaky today ... Once he started taking questions, that "coke jaw" thing the AAR people talk about was full blown ...

I just don't see how this guy is going to make another three years without totally losing it ... The dam has broken, he doesn't have complete immunity from the media, congress is going to start breaking on him, the masses are waking up ...

I mean it, I think we are going to see things from this guy that people never could imagine that they would see from a president ... That clip Maher showed of him "taking responsibility" for Katrina, they slowed it down just a bit, and you could just see that he was ready to blow, that it just went against every grain of his being ...

On a side note ... They showed the crew pouring in for the press conference ... Rove slunk in and went into the back, then Cheney, Rummy, Condi and some general lined up behind Bushco ... This reminded me of one of the press conferences down in Crawford where Rummy, Cheney and Condi lined up on the road behing Bushco while he was talking ...

Looking at these people ... They just REAK of swarminess (like that is a word) ... It almost is the visual cue for Franken's Operation Chickenhawk ... These people just are vermin ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I don't think it's coke jaw
He has the look of someone who is chronically constipated. And why wouldn't he be, considering what he's full of? In fact, the blockage is so extensive that it's actually backed up into his head.

He probably just needs a good poke to loosen him up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Though being the Enquirer, it's likely that the two sources mentioned
were completely fabricated, and that the author of the article more than likely spoke to no one.

But yes, I DO admit, that I want - really, really want to believe it. In fact, I do believe that Fuckstick is drinking heavily, because I've never believed what I feel are his lies about stopping.

I would bet money the SOB war criminal is sloshed half the time.

And I wouldn't be surprised if he had violent outbursts like the article says.

That would be totally in character for an alcoholic, especially a spoiled rotten, miserable, ignorant one.

But I hold little stock in the Enquirer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Blood for Hubris Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. If it's Rove spin, which it well might be, Rove must be out of his
kidney-stone-pain-addled mind. Is he really trying to suggest that Bush started drinking because of his feelings of unbearable compassion that suddenly arose four days after Katrina hit?

I mean, cripes. Plus, BWA HA HA.

Duh. Karl needs some med advice from chubby druggie Rush.

Lamest spin I ever heard. Did Karl forget many people observed Bush's initial vacation landing in TX and how no ordinary people were allowed to view him? This well before Katrina?

Bwa ha ha indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. The fact that the Enquirer would think it safe to print such an article...
is far more significant than whether or not the article is true. They would never have run such a thing back when Bush was Caesar, but now, it's safe to call him a boozer.

My, how things have changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
25. Exactly--you got it, 100%---
Doesn't matter if it's true, it's that the Enquirer felt "emboldened" to print it.

Blood in the water...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. He doesn't have to play to his real base
they would stick with him if he ate babies in the Rose Garden. Just as long as they were not aborted fetuses, that is.

How would you prove the story wrong? You would have to out the sources and prove they were lying. How would you do that? Make him submit to a breathalizer? Or they could say "I never said that." But then its the ENQUIRER. So,even if they prove it wrong, Bush's base may just think "Hey, maybe that two headed alien really DIDN'T give birth to quintuplets last week!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. He doesn't have to "prove" it wrong
Edited on Fri Sep-23-05 06:32 AM by karynnj
Others will act with the same outrage that they did on the basically true Rather story. They will yell liberal media (ignoring al the Clinton stories) and defend the honor of the President - explaining that his appearance is simply a reflect of his genuine concern and anguish. This accusation is important as nothing else that has been written would be seen as totally unfair.

Oh, and they will criticize this and throw in all the other liberal media who are politicizing a natural disaster. They will then go after the Democrats who spoke up - starting with Kerry. (I'm not sure what they will do with the Clintons - she called for an investigation, he criticized Bush - but he's been their friend.)

Remember, he gets the benefit of the doubt. (Look at last year - 5 people were fired including one of the most esteemed broadcasters over the basically true National Guard story. Notice no one was even repremanded for all the SBVT stories of the TOTALLY MADE UP STORY on Fox with fake Kerry quotes saying he was a metrosexual and got manicures. The Kerry campaign couldn't even get the guy off covering their campaign.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. recent reports by WH insiders wanting to be anonymous of his
outbursts anf tantrums, such as aides not wanting to deliver any bad news including Katrina news, seem to match up with the boozing story.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Yep and that was in Newsweek. Oh, yeah, I just remembered, they
are as untrustworthy as the Enquirer.

Naw seriously, the Enquierer is probably spot on and they probably have some sources who gave them this information.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't get it
So what if he drinks, lots of people do. I thought drinking was mandatory if you were a politician.

I don't know why this would be such a big story. Certainly no bigger than the Clenis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. It is a big deal, since when he ran in 2000, he took great pains
to paint the picture that he had sobered up, and that he was an alcoholic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philarq Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. The real story --may be that the Enquirer
and Page six papers like the Enquirer are abandoning the Red-State bias that they have shown to this point--While the "Space Alien" endorsing Clinton stories were interesting 12 or so years back, the Enqirer and itrs ilk turned upon Clinton when there was "blood in the water" so to say---perhaps next we get the Gennifer type press conference where the informants are trotted out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elfin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. Bet the "family source"
is Sharon - Neil's ex. who has heard it second or third hand from someone else - maybe one of her kids eavesdropping on dear old Dad.

Can't think of anyone else who would risk Bush retalilation over this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Maybe some Inquirer stringer got one of the Bush twins drunk.
Or maybe Laura is really serious about keeping her Bushie off the sauce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. Crap crap crap -
Edited on Thu Sep-22-05 10:32 PM by higher class
crap - since Katrina? ha! - he has been under something for a long time

crap - the Natl Enquirer didn't have a scoop - they are only being used - it's all a pretend scandal by design - all the big paper media ceo's got together with Cheney and the think tanks and they all figured out that the Natl Enquirer was the best to break it to the public using NA. No, no scoop, they agreed to be used.

crap - it was such a soft piece and another insult to our intelligences.

crap - that they would think that they could make us believe that this just started - they must be trying to break it to the followers and swallowers.

BUT - I'm glad it's out and let's hope for the nation that it isn't a cocaine habit also (or worse).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. "Bad feeling?" "Bad feeling?" . . .
Edited on Thu Sep-22-05 10:36 PM by TaleWgnDg
"Bad feeling?" "Bad feeling?"

The "bad feeling" is that George Walker Bush, an alcoholic and drug addict, never got professional help. Never admitted to his addictive behavior. Instead, he "Jesus-freaked" his way to "recovery," exchanging one addiction of substance abuse with another addiction of over-zealous religious practice.

And, on top of that, any psychiatrist, psychologist, or well-qualified therapist can tell you that alcohol and/or drug addiction is self-medication for a deeper underlying mental disorder.

And, America voted-in this disordered individual! "Bad feeling," you say? That's putting it rather mildly.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. This doesn't track at all. Rove wouldn't start a whisper campaign on Bush
You don't start damning rumors about yourself just so you can shoot them down. Whisper campaigns always do damage to the topic of the rumors--even when they're later proven to be false. Just ask Richard Jewel, the security guard who was the hero of the Atlanta terror bombing that ultimately failed to disrupt the Olympics. Mostly what people remember about him is that he had little porno habit, but many others still wonder if he wasn't involved in planting the bomb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. With Rove, it's not a matter of what you plant...
but of where and how you plant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I_Will Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-05 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. I jut had an awful thought...
...maybe it will all be correographed so that he has a tearful "Jimmy Swaggert" <http://badattitudes.com/MT/archives/002791.html>
moment of repenentence during a national TV interview, "reaffirming" his fundie underpinnings and re-igniting the base. All's forgiven, and like the backdraft in a burning building, they'll surge to vicious dominion over the rest of us, taking by whatever means that which isn't given to them willingly.

Man, I have to buy a better brand of tin foil (grin).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
20. It could be the people who control Rove think Bush should be pushed out
Hence the sympathy strings they are pulling. That would be to get him out on better terms than if he is impeached or if he flubs 2006. I wonder if Cheney will resign first (health reasons, just had blood vessel surgery)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Yes this is possible...
the repugs are worried about themselves right now. Will this be the strategy to save their necks?

"Not our fault. Our dear wonderful leader has a problem. We have to get him help. "

The Sheeple will buy this hook, line and sinker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-23-05 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
23. Naw...
... I don't believe for a second this is a "Rove plant". Why? Because until it hits the mainstream media anyone who wishes to will ignore it as "bullshit gossip".

If it shows up on CBS news, then I have to wonder. But even then, I've just never quite bought into the idea that Rove controls the media with an iron fist. Or anything else.

I think we are already seeing the limits of what propaganda can do. It does have limits you know. Even in Soviet Russia, the people knew they were hearing nothing but lies. The US is not far behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC