Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi and Waxman introduce Anti-Cronyism Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:04 PM
Original message
Pelosi and Waxman introduce Anti-Cronyism Act
WASHINGTON, Sept. 27 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Today, Congressman Henry A. Waxman and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi introduced the Anti-Cronyism and Public Safety Act, which would prohibit the President from appointing unqualified individuals to critical public safety positions in the government.

"President Bush has handed out some of the country's most difficult and important jobs - leadership positions in public safety and emergency response - to politically well-connected individuals with no experience or qualifications," Rep. Waxman said. "This common sense legislation will end this practice and ensure that public safety is back in the hands of those who are trained and experienced in protecting the public."

<snip>

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=54082
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Have they introduced an anti war profiteering act?
Edited on Tue Sep-27-05 01:06 PM by redqueen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good. And good luck.
There is no hope of this getting traction with our somnolent press and a Repuke controlled Congress. But it's a great idea and it's good to see them doing something about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Meanwhile, Brownie is still working for FEMA! Incredible! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pbartch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. yeh but some of those Republicans that were reaming out Brown
didn't seem too happy with him today.

I think most everyone hates Brown's guts.....Dems and GOPs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just for fun
Edited on Tue Sep-27-05 01:29 PM by ayeshahaqqiqa
I think I'll phone my repuke conman and ask him to support this bill-and to explain to me if he does not. I'm assuming he'll come up with some excuse-but I'll keep the letter and send it to his Democratic opponant in 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here's a fun link a couple of clicks (starting with Google) turned up.
Edited on Tue Sep-27-05 01:43 PM by igil
http://www.voluntarytrade.org/downloads/Brown_ConfirmHrg.pdf

It's the confirmation hearing transcript for Brown:
17 Senators were members, and there was some staff, but only Lieberman, Akaka, Bunning, and Bennett actually showed up.

Nighthorse Campbell and Wayne Allard were witnesses. Presumably both in favor of him. Nighthorse Campbell called him an "outstanding gentleman" early on in the transcript.

We had a mechanism that would have prevented the cronyism that got Brown hired in 2002. It's called the U.S. Senate.

On edit (after correcting a zillion typos): Lieberman was chair. Does that mean this was when the Senate was still at least nominally dem controlled?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melissinha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. This was for Deputy Director, Akaka seemed skeptical
Edited on Tue Sep-27-05 02:00 PM by melissinha
What a bunch of ass kissing and commendations of his experience (they knew about eh Arabian Horse thing)

There didn't seem to be a vote.... THe most skeptical was Akaka.... Wonder what he has to say to day, he had some very valid points....


So are we to assume that he just moved up the ladder from this pathetic hearing? Screw Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yes. He got the job through cronyism,
with our ever lovely senators rubber stamping him. It should have been stopped then.

Then, after a couple of years there, he was promoted up.

I wonder if he had a second confirmation hearing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. It'll never fly, but I'm damned glad they did. That's MY guy, Henry
"The Righteous" Waxman there. He is never anything less than TERRIFIC - at least I have some pride in my representation. I don't have a president but my congressman rocks, as does at least one of my senators - Ms. Boxer that is. Feinstein - eh - so-so for the most part. At least she voted against Roberts. Otherwise, she's a bit too much of a capitulator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Pretty sad something like this needs to be legislated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. Even if it doesn't fly this time, they need to keep bringing it up,
over and over and over. This is very important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Not saying its right,
But Presidents always do this. Its just none have done it to the extent of Bush. Presidents will give there cronies jobs like Ambassador to Bermuda, or Lichtenstein. Putting one of these guys in charge of FEMA is completely riddiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Of course, it happens all the time in business and politics.
It's just that Bush seems to have gone out of his way NOT to appoint qualified people. It looks as though he doesn't care how his appointees perform ... and that's very bad leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Pukes are likely to vote for for this Act in virtual lockstep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Won't it be difficult to put criteria on this?
This may be a good bill, but I think it is a lousy replacement for the Senate doing their duty. Drownie Brownie was approved by the Senate. That's where he should have been stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. My thoughts exactly -
- the president merely nominates. It's the Senate that does the approving and gives them the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC