Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Journalists concerned, puzzled over Miller case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 10:52 AM
Original message
Journalists concerned, puzzled over Miller case
Journalists concerned, puzzled over Miller case

By DAVID B. CARUSO
Associated Press Writer

October 1, 2005, 10:48 AM EDT


NEW YORK -- New York Times reporter Judith Miller's decision to escape jail by testifying about her conversations with a confidential source surprised some of her supporters and left journalists wondering what her choice will mean for press freedoms.

--------------

News of her release from jail was greeted with joy by some of the organizations that had supported her, but also some dismay.

"Miller's release is obviously good news in itself," said the press freedom group Reporters Without Borders, "but she recovered her freedom in exchange for naming her source, albeit with the source's agreement, which means that the principle of the confidentiality of sources, one of the pillars of journalism, has been flouted."

Lucy Dalglish, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, praised Miller for her conduct in the case, but predicted its outcome would embolden other prosecutors to investigate press leaks, jailing reporters if necessary.

"This is very dangerous territory," she said.

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cialeak-journalis1001oct01,0,3781688.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Allow me to fucking explain, dammit
Edited on Sat Oct-01-05 11:07 AM by PurityOfEssence
Fitzgerald probably agreed to narrow the line of questioning to her role in the Plame affair. She almost definitely hid in prison to avoid questioning on her systematic lies in print to help her neocon friends gin up a war to stomp Hussein and help Israel.

Were she to have been questioned about all this, she would have shown herself as a liar of the soul who cynically sinned against the very heart of her profession while revealing the true evil of this administration. Had she perjured herself, she would have been found out. Had she told the truth, she would have revealed herself as a deeply unscrupulous liar in league with reckless world-conquering maniacs. Not only would her character as a "journalist" have been rightly ruined, but her life would have been in jeopardy from the neocons.

How hard is all that to understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. fuck miller and the rag she works for
they have been bush`s paid whores since 2000 and they deserve all the blame when what is left of the news media is put in chains by the neocon supreme court. the very supreme court that they were silent about when the supreme court were slowly eroding the rights of the citizens of the united states. it didn`t matter to them then and now it matters? a little to late now that the united states no longer has a freely elected government.so fuck them- fuck them all.
somehow we will still get the message out that all men and woman deserve more than what "they" want us to have. somehow the truth will always destroy the lies of those who repress us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC