Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

52% in poll would re-elect Clinton--AP/Buffalo News

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 01:51 PM
Original message
52% in poll would re-elect Clinton--AP/Buffalo News
Edited on Sat Oct-01-05 01:59 PM by Gloria
http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20051001/1039074.asp


52% in poll would re-elect Clinton
By MARC HUMBERT
Associated Press
10/1/2005
ALBANY - More than 50 percent of the state's voters say they definitely will vote to re-elect Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton next year, and she holds substantial leads over her potential Republican rivals, including Jeanine Pirro, a statewide poll found Friday.

A competitor for the GOP Senate nomination said the poll indicates Pirro is not the candidate to take on the former first lady.

The Marist College Institute for Public Opinion poll also found most voters don't think Clinton, who other polls have as the front-runner for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, should pledge to serve her full six-year Senate term if re-elected.

Facing criticism as a "carpetbagger" because she never before had lived in the state, Clinton made such a pledge when she first ran for the Senate in 2000, and her refusal to renew the pledge has become a key thrust of the Pirro campaign.

The Marist poll found 52 percent of registered voters said they definitely would vote to re-elect the former first lady while 32 percent said they definitely would vote against her.

Against Pirro, Westchester County's high-profile district attorney and favored candidate of Stephen Minarik, chairman of the state Republican Party, Clinton leads, 59 percent to 35 percent.

The new poll also showed Clinton leading Manhattan lawyer Edward Cox, a son-in-law of President Richard M. Nixon, 61 percent to 34 percent.

MORE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 01:55 PM
Original message
That's all??? That confirms it - 1/2 the people are STUPID. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Scratch that -- I jumped too soon. Thought you were talking BIG DOG
I must read before I respond, I must read before I respond, I must read before I respond....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Please gimme a link!
This is too juicy to pass up!

Thanks!

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would too. In a New York minute. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. She voted for the war, the Patriot Act........
She's got a way to go before she looks like anything but average.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. You go Girl!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Link up....got interrupted and thought I had posted it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TruePatriate Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. One of the Greatest Presidents of our time.
Go Clinton!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. man, you did the same thing I did -- this about Hillary...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Whoops! Me too! Wishful thinking, I guess :-) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lcordero2 Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. I assumed that it was for BILL Clinton too but I was wondering
why it was at a lowly 52%. For as much as I hate the DLC and for as much as I despise HRC she seems to be the lesser evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
lcordero2 Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. how was his comment harmful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Right now, we'd consider ourselves lucky to have HRC
I know those on DU who do not like the DLC and have cogent arguments for not liking it are sincere and caring liberals. Up to just a month ago I felt that it was a strong issue. Now, after Katrina and the loss of N.O. and the torrent of malfeasance of the Republicans and Bill Bennett's outrage, I think we've got to set aside all of our internal wars and concentrate on the true enemy.

It is a trauma to wake up every morning under this administration. It truly haunts me. HRC is the least of our problems!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's a Mandate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. F.Y.I. this is a little less than she got in 2000
She won her seat in 2000 with 55.27% of the vote.

For comparison, NY results for Dems in the Presidential cycles & Senate races in the last 12 years:

National:
48.26 Kerry (2004)
60.21 Gore (2000)
49.23 Clinton (1996)
43.01 Clinton (1992)

Senate:
55.27 Clinton (2000)
54.62 Schumer (1998)
55 Moynihan (1994)
47.8 Abrams (1992 - - for those who don't know, he lost to D'Amato)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. This is a different number...this is huge
These are people who will definitely vote for her. For this type of question 52% is a huge number. You can add on another 8-10% of those who are not decided yet falling her way. She will outdo her 2000 number by a considerable margin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC