Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

George Allen has ZERO service record in the military!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
election_2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 06:36 PM
Original message
George Allen has ZERO service record in the military!
So if the GOP decides to coronate Senator Allen as their presidential nominee over McCain, he won't be seen as having a very credible background on national security. Of course, they'll try to prop him up, but it's questionable whether Allen can get away with it the same way Bunnypants did...

I can see why Wesley Clark's supporters view his national security experience as a plus, in a potential General Election matchup against George Allen in 2008. Of course, they'd try to smear Clark as they would any other nominee...

But get this - - before his stint as Governor of Virginia, George Allen was a LAWYER!!!

Gee, and I thought only Democrats were trial lawyers... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberaliraqvet26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Allen is a rubber stamp for Rey-Gun's ghost
Edited on Sat Oct-01-05 06:48 PM by liberaliraqvet26
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. He's on the Foreign Relations committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes, but he's a blitering idiot
He can't make a point that doesn't include a football analogy. He is mean-spirited, dumber than a bag of cold rocks and doesn't have an original thought in his head. It is painful to twatch him in committee hearings, very painful.

That said, I agree, he could possibly be the Rethug nominee for Pres. They like them dumb and malleable and willing to tow whatever line Rethug Central comes up with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. That makes him the perfect GOP candidate--another chickenhawk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemDogs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. But he kept a noose in his office
He had a noose -- lynchings, anyone? -- in his office as Governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. He's the leading fundie and that will help him in the primaries
that's what scares me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American in Asia Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh God - Another Arrogant Dumb-ass with an Unbearable Smirk...
Really - do they clone them over there on the right? Sheesh. As much as I didn't think I could be MORE distraught, if my country elected this asshole next, I think I'd lose it entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolfman23510 Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Allen
Actually, Allen is a dangerous man. I live in Norfolk and he is a very good politician. Almost like a Clinton in Republican skin. Also, he is squeeky clean. His ads all have him and his beautiful, blueblood family and voters eat it alive. I would much rather see Santorum get nominated as he has more flaws/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. The difference between Clinton and Allen...
Bill Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. George Allen doesn't know what a Rhodes Scholar is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madville Donating Member (743 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hillary vs. Allen
They would be on equal footing at that point because niether has served in the military. If this was the choice in '08 it wouldn't be much of an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolfman23510 Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-01-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Hillary vs. Allen
I think 2004 proved that military service has nothing to do with it anyway. Hillary is our best chance as far as I can see. Not my favorite, but best chance to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvliberal Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
11. "National security experience" is a bunch of nonsense in terms
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 01:08 AM by nvliberal
of requirements for presidential nominees and doesn't mean squat when it comes to the presidency.

By that logic, women should never run for president since few of them have been in the military.

Re McCain, since when does being tortured as a prisoner of war for years make one eminently presidential material?

This Ike-type fixation on military backgrounds is becoming a trifle tedious and is basically a loser. I don't want a military type running for president who doesn't know anything about domestic issues, the issues that truly matter to most people.

Besides, Allen has a far better chance of stealing the presidency because he can be manipulated by the neocons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. If foreign policy experience is what we are looking for...
Then we should just run one of those military officers that sit in the situation room and advise the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. A war hero was just defeated by an AWOL cokehead, and Clinton took two
distinguished war heroes in 1992 and 1996, despite questions surrounding his Vietnam era activities.

I think its safe to say military service really doesn't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC