melissinha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-04-05 08:43 AM
Original message |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-04-05 08:44 AM by melissinha
All we have to do is:
Win back the House Impeach Bush and Cheney
Voila, piece of cake. NOT. Getting the House back is up to us, and is a mighty hard task. She isn't my favorite, but hey a nice change would be nice.
Kudos to Malloy for pointing this out this morning!
|
confludemocrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-04-05 08:47 AM
Response to Original message |
1. No to pro-war Democrats, including her. n/t |
melissinha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-04-05 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
before '08 and before the Bush Crime Family ruins the reputation and does irreperable harm to everything we hold dear.
I'm anti-war too, but I'm pro-accountability, pro-justice, pro-social programs, pro-environment...
|
WillYourVoteBCounted
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-04-05 08:48 AM
Response to Original message |
2. she is a sell out to AIPAC |
|
Pelosi is pro-war, huge benefactor of the Pro Israel lobby that gets the US to give Israel billions to keep the war going on in the middle east.
|
ArkDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-04-05 08:57 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Historically, we do better when running candidates with an |
|
executive branch background.
|
melissinha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-04-05 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. but she wouldn't be running |
|
she would become President, unless we could influence the House to appoint a more progressive Congressman. I'm all for it, some members of the CBC come to mind.
|
AntiCoup2K4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-04-05 09:08 AM
Response to Original message |
6. I guess I could deal with an accidental 2 year Pelosi Presidency........ |
|
....based on successful Chimpeachment and removal of the BCE.
But something tells me she would only be a slight improvement. Still would need a REAL candidate for 2008.
|
melissinha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-04-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
thats all I am asking for... then some real bills could get passed.
|
npincus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-04-05 10:39 AM
Response to Original message |
ISUGRADIA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-04-05 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Senate Republicans would never convict both leading to a |
|
Democratic President. Never.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 07:09 AM
Response to Original message |