Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I listened to Hannity today...delay's lawyer: wasn't a crime when he did

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 04:25 PM
Original message
I listened to Hannity today...delay's lawyer: wasn't a crime when he did
Hannity just had delay's lawyer on and said the indictments are wrong
and that what he did wasn't a crime when he did it!


to everything spin spin spin

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tell his lawyer to tell it to the jury
Quit whining and prove it in court. Douchebag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-05 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. I would be truly astounded
if any prosecutor would make such a stupid mistake, so I'm assuming it's not true.

The Constitution clearly forbids ex post facto laws in Article 1, Section 8-3.

For anyone who doesn't know, an ex post facto law would be like a cop giving you a speeding ticket for going 39 in a 30 mile per hour zone, but the sign wasn't reduced to 30 mph until two days after you got the ticket. When you got the ticket, it was a 40 mph zone. That's clearly illegal, and every prosecutor would know that so I don't think anyone would make a mistake like that on such an important case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawwolf Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. You'd be surprised...
especially when you are looking at facts that happened years ago. That isn't something that we (I'm a prosecutor) normally think about. We look at the 2005 criminal code, we look at the facts of the case and see if they violate one of the crimes. Something like the law changed in 2003 and the crime happened in 2002 could slip past. That is what is claimed to have happened here. He was looking into crimes that happened several years ago, and the law was changed the next year (also several years ago).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. He was referring to the 1st indictment of conspiracy.
I've heard rumors of that too. The Tx. law was changed a year leter. I think that's why Earls filed the second 2 charges a day later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Yes, this seems to be true....hopefuly the 2nd charge sticks
otherwise someone will have egg on their face, and as usual the dems will get blamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. YOU LISTENED TO HANNITY!! Wash your ears out with soap. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I listen to rushy for about 30 minutes during my lunch time drive
and hannity on the drive home.


gotta keep up with the enemy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. You're a better person than me. My blood pressure won't handle either. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verse18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. I heard that excuse too
as I was watched Delay on CSPAN the other day. I was shocked that he tried to make that his defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. A Repub legislature criminalized what DeLay did....

Exactly where is the Party of Morals and Integrity here?

Who screwed up here- did the Republican Lege criminalize something that wasn't a crime, or is DeLay admitting to a criminal deed that merely wasn't legally a crime at the time?

Oh, the moral dilemmas of being a Republican. Committing crimes or creating criminality, which is it?

Oh, to launder money or not to launder money, that is The Question. Whether 'tis better to....

Fuck that. These are no Hamlets or philosphers, these are plain morons and criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawwolf Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-05 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. What????
criminalize something that wasn't a crime?!?!?!?! Criminal deed that wasn't legally a crime?!?!?? I think my head is going to explode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedawg12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. trying his case on TV? sad, very sad. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
12. Tom Delay is a born-again ...
Xian man of God! Nothing - absolutely NOTHING - that he does is allowed to be called a crime!

What do you expect Delay's lawyer to say? What do you expect from Sean Hannity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. Hang down your head, Tom De-Lay, hang down your head & cry
Stick a fork in his fat behind. He's done politically. They've cut him out of the party and he's now persona non grata.



-----
my progressive political cartoon
http://www.webcomicsnation.com/neillisst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC