yellowcanine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-07-05 08:45 AM
Original message |
Is Fitsgerald "setting up" Rove for a perjury and obstruction of justice |
|
charge? Suppose Fitzgerald has new physical evidence (memos, etc) or testimony that Rove doesn't know he has and he is giving Rove enough rope to hang himself? Maybe Scooter has "turned" as an ass saving effort and is giving up Rove.
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-07-05 08:49 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Oooh, that would be fine by me! nt |
Caution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-07-05 08:52 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Most likely this is exactly what he is hoping for |
|
There are only two reasons to recall Rove. To push him into cutting a deal or to try to get him to perjure himself. Frankly I'm amazed Rove's attorney agreed to it. The fact that he did is something that worries me a lot about whether this case is going to lead to an indictment.
|
bowens43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-07-05 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
it's an indication that an indictment was imminent and this is a last ditch effort on rove's lawyer's part to stop it from happening.
|
spooky3
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-07-05 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. Rove could have testified again to un-perjure himself |
|
Edited on Fri Oct-07-05 09:45 AM by spooky3
according to a comment posted on p. 3 in response to O'Donnell's blog entry at huffpo.
The poster ("DH") claimed that if a citizen returns to the grand jury and tells the truth and explains that he misunderstood previous questions etc. then s/he would not be liable for perjury charges. If true, this would be a VERY interesting reason for him to return.
"Where, in the same continuous court or grand jury proceeding in which a declaration is made, the person making the declaration admits such declaration to be false, such admission shall bar prosecution under this section if, at the time the admission is made, the declaration has not substantially affected the proceeding, or it has not become manifest that such falsity has been or will be exposed." 18 USC 1623
|
etherealtruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-07-05 08:55 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Rove is being allowed to testify again to save his own ass. Trying to somehow convince the GJ that there is no/flawed evidence ...
|
yellowcanine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-07-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. The only way Rove saves his own ass is to "give up" Bush or Chaney. |
|
I have always assumed that Rove was the "big fish". But what if the big fish is Bush?
|
zulchzulu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-07-05 10:14 AM
Response to Original message |
7. I have a feeling it's a few more nails to firmly get Rove sealed in karma |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:49 PM
Response to Original message |