Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Term Limits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 03:07 PM
Original message
Term Limits
.....discuss ......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. I love 'em
Edited on Fri Oct-07-05 03:09 PM by tk2kewl
max 2 terms for senators and max 4 for reps

on edit: of course a constitutional amendment would be required but i say go for it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. I agree with you tk2kewl
We may lose a good senator's third and fourth decades once in a while, but I think it will be worth it to et some new people in and to avoid the truly ridiculous.

Besides, if someone's an awesome public servant, they can do even more good by being congresscritter, senator, and governor than just sitting in one office for 40 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. NO CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS!!!

Seriously, we need to solve things without further amending the Constitution.

And I can't favor term limits when there are a few who do a good job. Do you really want Dennis Kucinich or John Lewis or Maxine Waters out of the House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why fire someone, if they're competent?
That doesn't make any sense, to me.

If they're incompetent or corrupt, then the people should vote them out of office. If they don't, well, they get what they get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrantDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. If that were enough Shrub would have been gone...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Again, the people get what they vote for...
Edited on Fri Oct-07-05 03:19 PM by Hobarticus
They put this jackass back up on top for another term. But that's how it goes.

Thank God for term limits for POTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. VERIFIED voting is the answer there. We should

go back to paper ballots that are hand-counted. Machines are more prone to error than people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Might be a good idea for SC
As for all the other politicos, we already have term limits, it's called an election. (Assuming of course one has a Diebold-free election)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The problem is we don't have diebold free elections
And we don't have a reliable media
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Elections would work if there wasn't
gerrymandering, but in more than half the districts for congress there are no elections, or meaningful elections anyway.

My district for instance for decades was drawn specifically to put every Republican voter for hundreds of miles into this district so Democratic candidates could win nearby districts.

Therefore, no Democratic candidate had a snowball's chance, and no Republican candidate would challenge the incumbant in the primaries. Therefore, the guy stays as long as he wants to.

It's the same thing in the senate in some states.

In South Carolina no Democratic candidate culd win and no Republican would challenge Strom Thurmond so he won reelection when he was 158 years old. It's the same thing in West Virginia only reversed. Sentaor Byrd will be there until he's doddering around drooling and talking about his dog at age 102. It's ridiculous.

These people think there is no one else in the state capable of doing their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. I like the Constitution pretty much the way it is.
Edited on Fri Oct-07-05 03:37 PM by longship
No term limits works the same for all parties. We're caught in a bit of a pickle because of Repug lock on power now. But it has worked in Dem's favor before. Term limits do not solve the core of the problem; they only apply a band-aid to it.

The problems in Congress might be better solved with other methods. Campaign reform. Electoral reform.

We should take campaigns out of the hands of corporations, completely and totally.

We should do everything we can to reduce the length of the campaign season.

We can discuss whether the electoral college is still a wise thing.

We should look at instant runoff voting, or something similar.

We should amend the Constitution to make voting a right of every citizen.

We should make national standards for open and auditable election technologies which should, as a minimum, be equivalent to manual, paper ballots.

With the exception of minor Constitutional tweaking, all this can be accomplished with majority rule congressional action.

Term limits don't solve the big problems.

And about the federal courts... Again we're in a pickle now only because of Repug lock on power. There are many good reasons for the court structure and rules exactly the way they are. I would not want to disrupt that. And again, the solution might be electoral and campaign reform for congressional and presidential offices. I would not go for term limits on the judiciary. Solve the problem at its origin.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I tend to agree with much of what you said .......
..... particularly campaign reform.

No corporate/pac money

No private donations

100% publically funded.

Mandated free air time with 100% equal access

Teevee talking heads would be obliged to identify opinion as such - clearly, unequivocally, and frequently (like at every commercial break).

(And here's my draconian capper) A censorship on 527 (or 527-like) teevee ads. The would be completely banned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dave Sund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. But it's a dream
Much like term limits. Do we honestly think a corrupt senate and house would pass meaningful campaign reform?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. The big problem
With the courts is that these people get lifetime appointments and they are specifically told not to give direct answers to questions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. I agree with you except NO AMENDING THE CONSTITUTION!

I assume you want to give felons back the franchise once they've done their time, which is the right thing to do, but can be accomplished without an amendment.

Any other citizens who can't vote now? Just those under 18 AFAIK and I don't favor lowering voting age to 16 or 14. We probably made a mistake to lower it from 21 in the first place. No one is as wise at 18 as he or she is at 21.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dave Sund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. I really am sick of the argument...
Edited on Sat Oct-08-05 01:54 AM by Dave Sund
That our term limits are elections. You can't bemoan the entrenched minority of wealthy people that control our government and at the same time say that our elections are able to change things.

It's funny that I was just thinking of posting this topic when I saw it up here.

I can totally see the benefit of it. I'm a little iffy on some details, but I'd be all for it if it ever happened. Something that will probably come back to bite me in the ass in the future, but here's my thought.

The federal budget has run amok with Congressmen who have so much pork because they are concerned about getting reelected. Imagine if Senators could spend six years without having to worry about being reelected. If Congressmen could actually get something done that didn't have to do with a campaign. If we have term limits, abuse of power is decreased. We actually have some chance at making our votes MATTER!

I don't believe it will ever happen, but term limits are almost essential to bringing any sort of true reform to our completely corrupted system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveColorado Donating Member (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Dem Bones
I take exception to your remark about young people.

I worked on John Kerry’s campaign when I was only 20.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. I think term limits are lame
Edited on Sat Oct-08-05 04:35 AM by Awsi Dooger
The idea just reminds me of football coaches or regimes who are on limited time, and they know it. You get stupid shortsighted, panic-mode decisions. As a Dolphin fan, I experienced those bigtime last year, with Wannstedt/Spielman making every type of disastrous move like trading a #2 for A.J. Feeley, #3 for Lamar Gordon and so on. Now we've got a coach with longterm security and a plan in that regard, and everything makes sense.

That may not equate perfectly to politics, but IMO damn close. You get guys in there for short periods and they'll overreact to the here and now, promising the voters to fix whatever is on the front page. Would saving social security, for example, be a big deal for someone who will be term limited out decades earlier?

I remember from my history courses this is anything but a slam dunk. Those who cite the Constitution and Founding Fathers are conveniently leaving out that Washington and Jeffferson supposedly favored some form of rotation in office, as it was called then. They settled on very short terms like two years for congressman as a suitable replacement, never projecting the monetary factors of today.

Where do you draw the line? Term limits may make some sense at the federal level, where candidates are in abundance, but in many small rural areas you've got one outstanding politician who is more than willing to take over for decades. Toss him/her out after a short and arbitrary period and you may create a self-inflicted certified mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-05 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
19. We have term limits in the Maine Legislature
It's worked to give lobbyists much more power. They've become the ones with the institutional knowledge.

I don't think it's a great idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC