Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Miers: "Warren Burger is my favorite Supreme Court Justice"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:34 AM
Original message
Miers: "Warren Burger is my favorite Supreme Court Justice"
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 11:35 AM by npincus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Burger

On Stephanopoulous this morning, Sen. Patrick Leahy confirmed that in his meeting with Miers, he had asked her to name her favorite Supreme Court Justice (or the one she most admired), and she answered "Warren". She then clarified her response: " Justice Warren Burger".

Interesting. Warren Burger voted in favor of Roe vs. Wade. Is this a case of Miers telling a Dem senator what she thinks he wants to hear, or is this a reflection of her real way of thinking, or is this an example of her lack of knowledge about Court history? In any event, this exchange was later repeated on Chris Matthews' show on NBC.

Here is a bit of biographical info on Miers' 'Favorite Justice":

The Burger Court

In the early 1970s, it became apparent that Burger was not going to turn the clock back on the rulings of the Warren Court, as the Court issued rulings supporting busing to reduce de facto racial segregation in schools and invalidating all death penalty laws then in force, although Burger dissented from the latter decision. In the most controversial ruling of his term, Roe v. Wade, Burger voted with the majority to recognize a right to abortion.

Burger was a strong supporter of separation of powers and the maintenance of checks and balances between the branches of government. In 1974 he ruled against President Nixon's attempt to keep several memos and tapes relating to the Watergate scandal private, prompting Nixon to resign in order to avoid impeachment. In the 1983 case of Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, he held, for the majority, that Congress could not reserve a legislative veto over executive branch actions.

On issues involving criminal law and procedure, Burger remained reliably conservative. He joined the Court majority in voting to reinstate the death penalty in 1976, and in 1983 he vigorously dissented from the Court's holding in the case of Solem v. Helm that a sentence of life imprisonment for issuing a fraudulent check in the amount of $100 constituted cruel and unusual punishment.

<snip>

Overall Burger's was not a strong voice on the court. He often only wrote straightforward and uncontroversial opinions and avoided those in which the court was evenly split. Instead, he poured his energy into the other role of the Chief Justice, administering the nation's legal system. He initiated the National Institute for State Courts, which is now located in Williamsburg, Virginia, the Institute for Court Management, and National Institute of Corrections to provide professional training for judges, clerks, and prison guards. He initiated the annual State of the Judiciary speech given by the Chief Justice to the American Bar Association. Some detractors thought his emphasis on the mechanics of the judicial system trivialized the office of Chief Justice.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. No wonder the so called "religious"
right think she's not insane enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. they are still 'crafting' her image with the so-called 'religious' side
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is there any reason to expect that refering to Burger by his first name
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 11:40 AM by patrice
would be appropriate to her relationship to him?

Sounds odd. Like someone who somewhat imperfectly remembered something (a "chunck" of short-term memory) that she was told to say. Does that sound like anyone we know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt Remarque Donating Member (709 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. i suspect that it was just a lack of knowledge
sounds like something bush would blurt out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I thought the same thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
win_in_06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Me too. She's was confusing Earl Warren and Warren Burger then
Edited on Mon Oct-10-05 06:27 AM by win_in_06
blurted out, "Warren Burger"

Reminds me of (from Mr. Mom)

"110, 210, whatever it takes"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I took her reference to "Warren...Justice Warren Burger" as a joke (and
I think it was even a somewhat funny joke for law nerds). Any Republican nominee who said Earl Warren was her favorite judge would torpedo her chances faster than if she confessed to being a practicing baby-eating Satanist. Earl Warren is the ultimate judicial bugbear to the right because he was nominated by a Republican and then went on to lead the court leftward (think Justice David Souter times 1,000).

Warren Burger is a suitable model for Miers. He was a true conservative -- which means he was committed to stare decisis -- rather than a reactionary activist like Scalia, Thomas, or Roberts who would ignore 70 years worth of legal precedents if they didn't fit his right-wing agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. mmmmmm....
Burger...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. burger..., burger...
Oh, burger - Mad Cow.
There's a pun in there somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. She knows the name of a SC justice, give her the job. nt
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 12:04 PM by cassiepriam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Then she'll know two.
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 12:06 PM by RC
Maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. ROTHFL Then she'll be smart enough to be Chief Justice.
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 12:11 PM by cassiepriam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks for this info on Burger. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little-Jen Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Was John Roberts asked this question?
If yes, what was his answer? Seriously, this is a great question that every nominated Justice should be asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. The easiest cop-out answer to that question is to say John Marshall
Edited on Sun Oct-09-05 10:14 PM by tritsofme
IIRC that's what Roberts said.

I'm surprised Miers didn't say that as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. yes, Leahy said he has asked this question to every SC nominee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little-Jen Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. I think a better question would be
"Who's your favoite CURRENT SC Justice."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bornskeptic Donating Member (951 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. He said Robert Jackson was his favorite,
or one of his favorites. I found this from an article about a speech he made at Wake Forest.

Nevertheless, after describing the general back-and-forth procedure he takes before deciding a case, Roberts fielded questions from the audience. Dinan recalled one particular question from a student concerning Roberts’ favorite justice.

Expecting to hear him say either Antonin Scalia or Clarence Thomas, who are known for taking more conservative stances, he was surprised when Roberts reached back in history to name Robert Jackson and Felix Frankfurter, both nominees of President Franklin D. Roosevelt.


http://ogb.wfu.edu/?id=2531_0_9_0_M
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Either he was lying, or we have misjudged(bad pun) him.
In 1943, Jackson authored the majority opinion in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943), which overturned a public school regulation making it mandatory to salute the flag and imposing penalties of expulsion and prosecution upon students that failed to comply.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_H._Jackson

However, Frankfurter was more conservative, but hardly a right-winger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Odd. I've never heard anyone give that response.
Mine has always been William O. Douglas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. She refers to SC justices by first name?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. At least she didn't say Warren Buffet
Or Jimmy Buffet . . . :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. Leahy should have said, "Really, Miss Miers? And why is that?"
The absolute blankness of her harridan face would have sucked all intelligence out of the room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
19. John Roberts couldn't have liked that response
Most justices who served under Warren Burger thought him insufferable, including Robert's boss, William Rehnquist. He was an exceedingly poor manager and was considered an intellectual lightweight. But he sure looked the part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-10-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
23. Bush doesn't give a crap about Roe V. Wade
I really wish dems would get that through their heads and get the message out to the GOP fundamentalist base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC