Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Isikoff: Fitzgerald Focusing on Rove's "Missing" Email

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:06 PM
Original message
Isikoff: Fitzgerald Focusing on Rove's "Missing" Email
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9630676/site/newsweek/

If this is all it's about, it seems that Fitzgerald is focusing on an obstruction of justice charge, rather than espionage. Then, it may just be one facet of Fitzgerald's inverstigation.


But lawyers close to the case, who asked not to be identified because it's ongoing, say Fitzgerald appears to be focusing in part on discrepancies in testimony between Rove and Time reporter Matt Cooper about their conversation of July 11, 2003. In Cooper's account, Rove told him the wife of White House critic Joseph Wilson worked at the "agency" on WMD issues and was responsible for sending Wilson on a trip to Niger to check out claims that Iraq was trying to buy uranium. But Rove did not disclose this conversation to the FBI when he was first interviewed by agents in the fall of 2003—nor did he mention it during his first grand jury appearance, says one of the lawyers familiar with Rove's account. (He did not tell President George W. Bush about it either, assuring him that fall only that he was not part of any "scheme" to discredit Wilson by outing his wife, the lawyer says.) But after he testified, Luskin discovered an e-mail Rove had sent that same day—July 11—alerting deputy national-security adviser Stephen Hadley that he had just talked to Cooper, the lawyer says. In the e-mail, Rove said Cooper pushed him on whether the president was being hurt by the Niger controversy. "I didn't take the bait," Rove wrote Hadley, adding that he warned Cooper not to get "far out in front on this." After reviewing the e-mail, Rove then returned to the grand jury last year and reported the Cooper conversation. He testified that the talk was initially about "welfare reform"—a topic mentioned in the e-mail—and that Cooper then changed the subject. Cooper has written that he doesn't recall a discussion of welfare reform.

Why didn't the Rove e-mail surface earlier? The lawyer says it's because an electronic search conducted by the White House missed it because the right "search words" weren't used. (The White House and Fitzgerald both declined to comment.) But the e-mail isn't the only belatedly discovered document in the case. Fitzgerald has also summoned New York Times reporter Judith Miller back for questioning this week: a notebook was discovered in the paper's Washington bureau, reflecting a late June 2003 conversation with Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis (Scooter) Libby, about Wilson and his trip to Africa, says one of the lawyers. The notebook may also be significant because Wilson's identity was not yet public. A lawyer for the Times declined to comment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rove is going down for this one
The treason case has always been the weakest part of the case against Rove. It's the lying to the grand jury and the obstruction of justice that will take him down.

Yeah, I believe he's going down for this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I can't wrap my brain
around that it's not treason to out a CIA agent for one's own country. Especially a DEEP undercover one who's working on WMD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. there`s going to be a lot of
tricks and treats in the big bag full of surprises
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToolTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe those 12 hours to clean house will burn them.
Now that Fitzgerald is getting e-mail from others, outside the WH, there may be a few matching inside that went amissing - somehow. Remember Rosemary's 18 minute gap?

Just about time to pop the corn and pour the Pepsi. Maybe a box of Milk-Duds, too. If Fitzgerald is as good as his billing this will be long, hard, and deep!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left is right Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. would you make mine a coke
and drop a hand full of the milkduds into the popcorn. they get warm and gooey and the sweet mixed in with the salty is quite good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToolTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Yum a dum duds.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. When you send out an email...
at least two people have copies of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Deleted emails can be retrieved as well
Attorneys have hired experts to do this in cases where the emails were needed as evidence for a case. I am familiar with one case where three people being tried all had their deleted emails recovered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. that's right- and if you're like me, you archive everything
going out and coming in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Notice how adroitly turd-blossom got between Bush and Fitzgerald. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. if all goes well, Fitzgerald will be the wedge between B*sh and Rove
or, the forceps that removes B*sh's brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. more like vacuum extraction needed
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justgamma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's only perjury.
Some pundits I listened to this morning are trying to make a perjury and obstruction charge seem like frivalous charges. I wanted to scream "What about Clinton? What about Martha?" Weren't they really serious when Clinton was in office? The hypocracy is simply amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Oh Yes I remember it well, "Clinton lied under Oath" that's perjury
"He lied, it's not about sex, he lied" yada yada yada

But when the lies are done by their own party then it's A-okay according to them.

Oh no, Bush lied, about national issues, serious issues...and
NOONE DIED WHEN CLINTON LIED.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC