Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Miers' law firm backed Hillary (uh oh, this will set the RWers spinning)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 04:19 AM
Original message
Miers' law firm backed Hillary (uh oh, this will set the RWers spinning)
Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers' law firm contributed $1,000 to Hillary Clinton's Senate campaign in 2000, Federal Election Commission reports show.

Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP PAC, the political action committee of the Houston law firm Miers co-managed, made the contributions on May 19, 2000, two days after Miers contributed $415.91 to the PAC.

The contributions were revealed over the weekend in an FEC response to a request by the conservative Republican Study Committee for Miers' campaign contributions, and detailed on the left-leaning worldnetdaily Web site.

The report is sure to roil an already sharply divided Republican Party. ...

http://news.bostonherald.com/politics/view.bg?articleid=106487
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. I love the fact it will disturb the right, but ...
Edited on Tue Oct-11-05 04:43 AM by Neil Lisst
But that law firm's PAC goes both ways.

She was not a political person in the Dem-Pub sense, more in the I WANNA BE PRESIDENT OF THE STATE BAR sense.

In mid-life her existence was lacking, so she fell into evangelic religion. She worked with some groups that are closer to the fringe than I would like.

-----------------------
today I have a shout-out to DU mods and posters
http://www.webcomicsnation.com/neillisst/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm not ready to read anything into it either, I just love the controversy
The more the RW gets their patooties in an uproar, the better it is for us. Let them spit and spew and get hysterical, on both sides of the issue, because half of them are guaranteed to come out on the wrong side, no matter what the outcome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Far as I can see
if you can't get a judge who is actually impartial, the best you can do is one who is bipartisan...

I think this is funny as hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Exactly, Hariette has her eye on professional advancement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC