http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/GJ13Aa01.htmlA high-stakes battle is raging over who should control the Internet, the world's most powerful communication tool that has arguably become an important vehicle of globalization.
Not the Americans, is the message from the rest of the world. Last week, high-level talks in Geneva failed to resolve the dispute as the European Union broke ranks with the US government and joined Brazil, China and Iran in demanding an end to America's supervision of the Internet.
-snip-
Brazil, Iran, Cuba and China want the creation of a new international body to govern the Internet, either through the United Nations or an independent organization. The Americans, deeply allergic to even the smell of the United Nations, vehemently oppose handing over this powerful tool to a bunch of bickering bureaucrats, many of whom will surely rise from countries on Washington's blacklist.
Incidentally, Iran - currently the cause of American ulcers - was active in Geneva opposing the domination of any "single government" in running the Internet. Brazil was equally vehement in its statement when it said bluntly: "On Internet governance, three words come to mind: lack of legitimacy. In our digital world, only one nation decides for all of us."
-snip-
-------------------------------
I could go with a revolving group of countries running the net. so no one country or group of countries could get sole control of the net.