|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 03:41 PM Original message |
Has Bush Applied A Religious Test in Selecting Miers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well, at least it wasn't a LITMUS test!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tk2kewl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. and it's surprising that * doesn't know the constitution or even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
3. That would not apply here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 03:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Still, it's unprecedneted in modern times, no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 03:49 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Maybe - Maybe not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 03:51 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. But to admit it openly--might as well appoint Falwell or Robertson, no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 03:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Of course it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
politicaholic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
4. woops... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
7. Why do you need to ask that question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abbeyco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
9. Uh, it just exemplifies the fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coastie for Truth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 04:26 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. That's because he's so effing dumb |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
11. The constitution bans exclusionary tests only. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enough already (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
12. Why is nobody outraged over this on our side? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kalyanvenkat (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
14. Is this legal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-13-05 12:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Hi kalyanvenkat!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 07:40 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC